The EV thread has certainly generated a lot of interest. Since this is a firearms forum, how about an EV firearm? US aircraft carriers are moving to electromagnetic catapults. Could that technology be applied to launching bullets? These guys sort of have an answer:
$3,375 Electromagnetic Gun Declared "A Serious Weapon" During Expert Range Report (Updated)
I know it looks clunky now, but as technology advances, we can expect to see less clunky versions in the future.
What would be some of the advantages of an EV firearm?
Infinitely adjustable trigger pull settings.
No worn/broken springs to complain about.
Cheap ammo -- just buy bullets, not cartridges.
No hitting the shooter to your right with ejected shells.
No groveling on the ground collecting brass.
No hearing protection necessary.
Disadvantages?
Replacing the magazine holders on your belt with battery holders.
Not usable for those with pacemakers. (Sorry, Rusty)
May be a bit heavy.
No groveling on the ground collecting brass.
Not pocket carryable.
More easily controlled by government regulations. (For example, mandatory "safety chips".)
I'm sure you can think of others.
$3,375 Electromagnetic Gun Declared "A Serious Weapon" During Expert Range Report (Updated)
I know it looks clunky now, but as technology advances, we can expect to see less clunky versions in the future.
What would be some of the advantages of an EV firearm?
Infinitely adjustable trigger pull settings.
No worn/broken springs to complain about.
Cheap ammo -- just buy bullets, not cartridges.
No hitting the shooter to your right with ejected shells.
No groveling on the ground collecting brass.
No hearing protection necessary.
Disadvantages?
Replacing the magazine holders on your belt with battery holders.
Not usable for those with pacemakers. (Sorry, Rusty)
May be a bit heavy.
No groveling on the ground collecting brass.
Not pocket carryable.
More easily controlled by government regulations. (For example, mandatory "safety chips".)
I'm sure you can think of others.