Any model 67 .38 owners out there?

Bud11

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
402
Reaction score
13
Would be interested to hear your experiences with the model 67 .38 as far as grip feel, accuracy and recoil. Currently looking at a new one that comes with the 4" barrel. I don't have big hands and thought the K frame (which I believe it is) would be a better fit than an L frame. I only have one range in my area and they don't have one to shoot. This would be my first gun and it would be used primarily for home protection. Thanks. Bud
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I had one and gave it to my son but to me the 38 special K frame with 4 inch barrel is a nearly perfect revolver. The balance is very good and they are usually very accurate and the recoil is quite manageable. I'm older at 67 and I don't like shooting 357 magnums out of a K frame with a 4 inch barrel but I like a 4 inch 38 special revolver.

I hope this helps
 
I don't have a Model 67, but I have the same gun in carbon steel - the Model 15. It is an excellent gun, one of the best. It is as accurate as any K Frame .38, which is to say very accurate, but its adjustable sights will let you take advantage of that accuracy better with different loads. The K frame fits many people very well and I prefer its balance to the L Frame. Many people consider the stainless 67 version preferable to the blued steel, but I prefer blue guns.
It's a great gun.
 
K and L frames have the same size grip, and the stocks are interchangeable, so size isn't really an issue as long as the grips fit your hand. The L-frames have more weight up front, which moderates the recoil a bit. Personally, I prefer a gun with a balance point just ahead of my knuckles, so the L-frames are my favorite, but a 38 doesn't kick much anyway.

I have a pair of J-frames, two N-Frames, and the other four are K or L-frames, and they get shot a LOT more than their counterparts. If you like to shoot, a K-frame and a couple boxes of 38's is about as good as it gets.
 
67-1dfw.JPG


This is my only 67, I love it, it was my first S&W revolver.........I must have thousands of rounds of .38 through this one. About 7 or 8 years ago when ammo was actually cheap it would be no big thing to run 500-1,000 rounds through this gun during a long afternoon at the range.

I am way more into fixed sight guns like the 10 and 64, but this 67 will always have a special place in my collection. For all intents and purposes the 15's and 67's are just taper barrel 10's and 64's with adjustable sights added.

The new S&W's have round butts, if that matters any. I would not hesitate to buy a used new 67, they are nice looking guns.
 
I'll look at the 64 and check out the sight differences. Didn't know about that model. Bud
 
Last edited:
While you're at it, check out a 66, which is very similar to a 67, but allows you to shoot .357mag if you want to. They're all great, built on the same frame, just slight differences in sights, barrel weight, hammer spur, trigger width, etc.
 
I like my 4" M67-1 so much that I recently purchased its M64 fixed-sight brothers in both 4" and 3" barrel lengths. Wonderful revolvers that thrive on good handloads.

IMHO, there is no better revolver for a relaxing afternoon of target shooting and/or introducing new shooters to our passion. Start with a .22LR revolver, then move them up to a soft .38 Special handload using cast LSWC bullets. They always love "the look" of the LSWC, and you'll appreciate the performance and economy. There's always time for the .44 Special later...
 
This Model 67 has been a favorite for sometime.........have mentored many new shooters at the Range with this one.
I dressed it up to my liking with target trigger/hammer, w/o rear site and nice, colorful factory Targets.
My Daughter started shooting this about four years ago and put it down pretty quickly wanting MORE recoil from a Model 19 (357 Magnum).
Can you say - "Proud Father" ? :)

67-011.jpg
 
Last edited:
The M15 (blue, carbon steel version of the M67) was the issued weapon when I attended the academy. I consistently shot in the 580's with that gun (600 was perfect.) My first issued Smith was a M67 and I shot many a PPC match with it. I still have two M67's. Great guns.
 
Darn, just found out my local gun range closed down. It was the only one close by, and I was looking forward to trying some revolvers there this week. Bummer. Bud
 
I don't think you'll find any revolver shooter with anything bad to say about the model 67. Mine is an older tapered barrel 67-1 and the balance is just perfect, it's one gun that I'll never ever sell.

As noted in a previous post, the K and L frames have the same grip frame, which means that grips size and trigger reach are the same in both frame sizes. Personally, I find the Hogue monogrip that is standard on the current guns to a bit small, IMO they are a better fit for the average female. I suspect that you'll find they are a pretty good fit right out of the box, if not there is a host of smaller grip options available for these guns. One option would be the old style round butt service stocks, to me those feel absolutely tiny.
 
I think I would agree with all the previous posts. If you see no need to shoot .357 magnums (and you don't for home protection) then the M67 is the clear choice. The M66 is a bit heavier because of the barrel and underlug, but I don't notice a difference with .38s. Both are accurate and feel very good to shoot. The M67 has Pachmayer grips and the M66 has Hogues in the photos. The M67 is also shown with the original stocks. BTW, both are from the 1970s, so technically I'm posting on the wrong forum.
 

Attachments

  • March 7 2011 003s.jpg
    March 7 2011 003s.jpg
    118.7 KB · Views: 138
  • PB020755_1000.jpg
    PB020755_1000.jpg
    106.1 KB · Views: 110
Last edited:
While you're at it, check out a 66, which is very similar to a 67, but allows you to shoot .357mag if you want to. They're all great, built on the same frame, just slight differences in sights, barrel weight, hammer spur, trigger width, etc.

I got a heck of deal on a Model 67 with 4" bbl. Then I got to thinking why did I buy that? I have several other 4" bbl. .38 specials and .357 mags. So, I looked thru the parts bin and came up with a 2.5" SS .357mag barrel and a nice SS .357 cylinder. About 45 minutes later, I was tuning a really nice short barreled .357 mag. It has proved to be a tack driver and a real pleasure to shoot. If I ever want to do so I can turn it back to the original .38 special. ........... Big Cholla
 
I have a model 67, and several model 15's. It is hard to find anything wrong with them.Great home defense revolver.
 
I have a model 67, and several model 15's. It is hard to find anything wrong with them.Great home defense revolver.

+1 on what he said and yes a defensive JHP load in a 38 special +P will work for home defense just fine.
 
I have a no dash model 67 that I lucked into with the box and all paperwork, but the weather has been so bad here that I have been unable to go try it out at the range! :mad:
Steve

model67-02.jpg


model67-0.jpg
 
+1 on just about everything said.

A 4" K frame is what many people start out with and the stainless Mod 67 is an excellent choice. It was originally called the "Combat Masterpiece" and it has earned that title.

Many rubber and wood grip choices are available for it to find the perfect fit. You would always have the option to "fancy" it up like VM has done with his 67 if you choose to.

Mod67-11-1.jpg
 
model 67...

had one... it was a great shooter... traded it in ... big mistake on my part
 
Back
Top