I have an input here but I will not swear that I am correct...
1. I keep hearing that 5.56 is higher pressure than .223 and I believe that is incorrect.
2. If you look at the Sierra manual, the loads for bolt guns are hotter than for AR's. If you look at the Cartridges of the World ---in the back and look at the powder and load for the Vietnam era rounds it is not any more that what you see in the bullet company manuals.
With all of this talk---a while back i just went to measure everything myself with what reloading tools I have available and this is what I think is the deal.
3. The old 55 grain 193 bullets has a surface bearing area that was relatively farther forward than many 223 caliber bullets and the M16 chambers were made with a freebore and a long tapered throat.
4. Bolt guns will not have such a freebore and long throat typically, but have commercial rifle throat. The worry was that if you took military rounds and put them in a commercial bolt gun, the rounds may already be jutted into the rifling, hence, a high pressure spike potential.
5. I measured some 1972, and 1980 military rounds, and some reloads of 55 ballistic tips loaded to mag length, and some various factory .223 ammo and the difference was that the military ammo was some 45 to 50 thousanths farther forward (if I remember correctly). On some of the military ammo, ---it was much more---the QC or consistency on the military ammo was quite varied.
6. I saw recently were Dick Treakle in the American Rifleman said the the new 62 grain bullets being so much heavier---so the need for very long throats on the military rifles. I am not sure he knows what he is talking about. The bullets weigh more but that extra bullet is not outside the case, they still have to fit in the magazine---right??. Hence---the extra bullet is deep in the loaded rounds and the exposed portion are as streamlined as the ballistic tips----I have measured them.
7. I have measured recent 55 grain FMJ rounds some even purported to be M193 bullets and they do not have the same configuration as the old military ammo I have measured. They are not as "fat forward" as the old military ammo.