BATFE and Convicted Felons with Guns

Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
5,717
Reaction score
12,977
Location
GA
I had a long talk today with my Sheriff while we both got haircuts. First, we discussed the statement regarding gun rights issued yesterday by the Georgia Sheriff's Association. A succinct, well worded statement of intent which says in part . . . . "will aggressively oppose any state or federal legislation which infringes on law abiding citizens' right to bear arms."
Georgia Sheriffs'
Jeff said the vote at the meeting was unanimous, with one Sheriff who might have opposed it absent from the meeting. I believe it is a meaningful statement coming from a group of LEOs who are pro 2nd Amendment. It is heartening to reside in a state where the head LEOs have this attitude.

Sheriff Watson commented on the fallacy of believing that any new laws would be beneficial, since BATFE doesn't vigorously prosecute violators of current laws. He related two recent incidents where he and his officers served warrants on previously convicted felons and found them in possession of firearms. In both cases, Jeff said, the ATF agent appeared eager to pursue Federal charges, then seemingly lost interest and decided not to prosecute. Jeff said that his Department will pursue charges of illegal possession in State court, but that it is sort of disheartening when the Federal Agency supposedly in place to prosecute this kind of crime shows little or no interest.
 
Register to hide this ad
Ahh, but if that ATF agent had found a small typographical error in a FFL dealer's records, he would be foaming at the mouth to prosecute him (or her)!

That is NOT my experience at all.
Maybe it depends on the attitude of the dealer.
The law requires an FFL dealer to keep correct records. You know that GOING INTO the business. You also know that they are totally within the law when they expect compliance, and when they inspect records.
I treat them with normal courtesy and normal human respect, and I have always been treated the same by them.

My records have been inspected twice.
I view it like having a medical procedure- I'd rather be doing something else, but you just have to go through it. :D
Both times, they found minor errors.
Both times, they had me correct the errors in front of them, and wrote my inspection up as being in full compliance (NO problems).
It don't get no better than that. ;)
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the AUSA/Judicial District that I'm under is not interested in enforcing federal firearm laws either.

I found a convicted felon once who was target shooting with his uncle's 10/22. He was on probation as well so I seized the gun, mags and ammo, FI'd and released (this district does not want anyone taken into custody (federally) either.)

The law clerk and one of the AUSA's said "we don't really prosecute that."

I said "really, 18 USC 922 (G)(1)?" He said "yeah, the counties usually do that stuff, see if they'll take it."

They did, so that's good. Maybe they just don't wanna do the work. But that judicial district rarely does federal firearm laws.
 
Last edited:
I arrested several CFWF's. never once (knock on wood) did I have any problems with them. Only once did an ffl get into a pickle over it
 
Back
Top