luvsmiths
Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2016
- Messages
- 1,135
- Reaction score
- 2,184
It's never really been about reducing crime.
![]()
Yeah, well, looks like he got dead first.
It's never really been about reducing crime.
![]()
I will patiently wait for someone to explain how more and stricter gun laws have worked.
California has some of the nations strictest gun laws. Lets look at what that has actually accomplished.
It isn't a gun problem, it is a people problem. The people bent on murder the most heinous of crimes do not care about the gun laws. That is as obvious as it gets, yet, the
"GUN CONTROL ADVOCATES" don't get it
It's not about 'gun' control. It's about people control.
JUDGMENT
Entered: April 7, 2023
In light of the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol ***'n, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022), the district court's judgment is vacated, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. In remanding this matter, we take no position on the outcome previously
reached by the district court, and we do not retain jurisdiction. Rather, in the event that any party contests the district court's decision, a timely new notice of appeal should be filed. No costs are awarded.
I'm putting this here since the laws being challenged are similar.
The First Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated a lower federal court ruling that the approved handgun roster law and MA Attorney Generals consumer protection regulations were Constitutional.
The case was remanded back to the District court for further proceedings in light of Bruen.
This is the entire text of the order. Oral arguments were heard earlier this week and judgement was entered today.