johncantiusgarand
Member
Well, I traded recently for one of the more common Canadian-issued .455 hand ejectors that were later converted to .45 Colt by reaming and shortening the cylinder. Finish shows lots of dings, scratches, and wear (especially on the last couple of inches of the barrel and backstrap). But there is no pitting, the bore is excellent, and it is otherwise perfect mechanically. Incidentally, this is one of the "R.M.T.C." marked ones that no one can tell me anything about except that it possibly stood for "Royal Military Training Centre".
Anyway, I'm not seeking information on its history but rather some reloading advice. I fired it the day I got it using standard factory Winchester 255 gr. loads, and it was accurate and pleasant. I have no idea what the pressure and velocity was. Since the strength of these conversions is questionable anyway, I'd rather not subject it to a regular diet of modern factory ammunition. I suppose I should just load up some mild smokeless loads for it, but I can't stand those "cowboy loads". Sure, the .45 Colt is no magnum, but it was still a powerful cartridge in its day, and that is part of its allure. A .45 Colt limited to such mild loads just feels neutered to me--regardless of the fact that I'll probably never shoot it at anyting other than targets.
I encountered frustrations trying to duplicate safe original .45 ballistics in my Colt SAA using published loads. The reloading manuals never got me anywhere near 900 f.p.s. with 255gr. bullets, and velocities were inconsistent due to the tiny charges in that large case. So I tried black powder and swore I'd never go back. I get consistent 900f.p.s.+ with black powder, and I do it with less pressure than smokeless (or at least with a more gentle pressure curve). Clean up is no big deal, and I can usually shoot 50-60 rounds before fouling starts to stiffen cocking. So I'm considering using these in my HE. The very presence of a fouling cup in the topstrap suggests that S&W anticipated the use of black powder loads, but I'm wondering how well the rest of the revolver deals with heavy black powder fouling. Anyone else use black powder in their older S&W hand ejectors?
Anyway, I'm not seeking information on its history but rather some reloading advice. I fired it the day I got it using standard factory Winchester 255 gr. loads, and it was accurate and pleasant. I have no idea what the pressure and velocity was. Since the strength of these conversions is questionable anyway, I'd rather not subject it to a regular diet of modern factory ammunition. I suppose I should just load up some mild smokeless loads for it, but I can't stand those "cowboy loads". Sure, the .45 Colt is no magnum, but it was still a powerful cartridge in its day, and that is part of its allure. A .45 Colt limited to such mild loads just feels neutered to me--regardless of the fact that I'll probably never shoot it at anyting other than targets.









I encountered frustrations trying to duplicate safe original .45 ballistics in my Colt SAA using published loads. The reloading manuals never got me anywhere near 900 f.p.s. with 255gr. bullets, and velocities were inconsistent due to the tiny charges in that large case. So I tried black powder and swore I'd never go back. I get consistent 900f.p.s.+ with black powder, and I do it with less pressure than smokeless (or at least with a more gentle pressure curve). Clean up is no big deal, and I can usually shoot 50-60 rounds before fouling starts to stiffen cocking. So I'm considering using these in my HE. The very presence of a fouling cup in the topstrap suggests that S&W anticipated the use of black powder loads, but I'm wondering how well the rest of the revolver deals with heavy black powder fouling. Anyone else use black powder in their older S&W hand ejectors?
Last edited: