Braveheart / Mel Gibson

ace22

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
1,238
Reaction score
1,223
even though i've seen it countless times and even own a dvd copy i just finished watching braveheart on tv.
it's such a powerful dramatic well made movie that no matter how many times i've seen it i still will sit down and watch it when it's on.
yeah i know it's not 100% accurate but it's powerful, entertaining, and i'm moved every time i watch it so that's enough for me.

and it's been mentioned before but besides his usually good acting mel has a real talent as a director and i'm looking forward to his next project, i posted about his wild bunch remake and i've also heard he's doing a follow up to the passion of the christ, the resurrection, and a ww2 movie, destroyer.

mel's plate is definitely full!
 
Register to hide this ad
Despite its historical inaccuracies (ex: Too early for kilts and the queen was about 10 years old), Braveheart is a good watch set in an under studied time in history. Likewise with Apocalypto. As said above, Gibson, like Stallone, is best viewed in movies and not interviews or in the news.
 
Around 15 years ago my wife went to make an academic presentation at a conference held at the University of Stirling in Scotland (she was a college professor at the time). Apparently that was William Wallace's home territory and there are several tourist sites in the area. One has a statue of William Wallace (called the "Freedom" statue). Except it has Mel Gibson's face.
 
Around 15 years ago my wife went to make an academic presentation at a conference held at the University of Stirling in Scotland (she was a college professor at the time). Apparently that was William Wallace's home territory and there are several tourist sites in the area. One has a statue of William Wallace (called the "Freedom" statue). Except it has Mel Gibson's face.

That's pretty sad. There's no resemblance at all. And I'd bet money the real William Wallace didn't have a hair weave.
no.gif
 
.... and i've also heard he's doing a follow up to the passion of the christ, the resurrection,...

Umm .... a sequel to the resurrection?

I knew Mel Gibson had a big ego, but ....
 
I liked Mel Gibson better in Lethal Weapon. His bi-polar suicidal Martin Riggs was a more realistic reflection of the real Mel Gibson than the heroic William Wallace. I don't think he had to act a whole lot in the Lethal Weapon franchise films.

MV5BZDM3YjA2YzYtZTgxNy00ZTExLWJkYTMtMDYzYTUzMGEzNmVlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzU1NzE3NTg@._V1_CR0,45,480,270_AL_UX477_CR0,0,477,268_AL_.jpg
 
The movie was about Scotland, but a lot of it was filmed in Ireland. Some of it was filmed at Castle Trim, which was built by my ancestors, the DeLacy family. People around me learned not to mention the film, unless they wanted to hear “Hey, did you know that’s my castle in the movie!”.
 
Braveheart is on my all time favorite list...most of which are filled with Clint Eastwood films....some are being vaporized due to baffonery on the actor's part....think Heat....politics and entertainment don't mix well.
 
This statue is in Downtown Stirling above the entrance to a building. The battle was 500 years before America was a country. Wow.....

And here is his statue at Edinburgh castle.

I took this photo in 1996, a year after the movie came out. Doesn't look much like Mel.

There were actually several clowns around town trying to capitalize on the film, half-naked and painted blue, playing bagpipes for the tourists hoping for tips :rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • Wallace Edinburgh 96.jpg
    Wallace Edinburgh 96.jpg
    80.3 KB · Views: 49
Back
Top