CBS reports on nationwide reciprocity.

USAF385

US Veteran
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
3,917
Reaction score
2,188
Location
NEPA Endless Mountains
CBS just had a segment on the proposed nationwide reciprocity.

Mayor Bloomberg called it the biggest anti-police pro-fire arms trafficking thing he's seen.

The reporter said that Henry Reid said he'll vote to support it tomorrow.

The segment was done fairly, of course some of the people interviewed had some wild opinions.

One comment was that this would increase violent crimes in cities.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
It would be nice if this went through. One person's comment was the thr right to protect yourself shouldn't end at state lines.. which I'm sure all of us totally agree with.
 
You'd think some of the Democratic leadership would have carpal tunnel problems, what with all the handwringing they do, and be tongue-tied from lieing...
 
Amen to that!

If my Marriage and Driver's license is valid from state to state, so should my CCW.

+10! That idiot that said reciprocity would increase crime obviously has no clue. It is not the legal, law abiding, CCW citizens that are doing the crime. They do occasionlly stop a few crimes but lets not confuse this bozo with the facts.
 
you know I think that even if you do present black and white clear cut evidence to them you are still wrong because 3 idiots in a group of 1000 smart people messed up
 
Sadly, my Senior Senator from the great state of NY,intends to phillabuster it, to be certain it doesnt happen.
Oh, that would be Chuck Schumer, for those who dont know.

Tom, who hopes someday to leave the great state of NY, for a more gun friendly state.
 
Sadly, my Senior Senator from the great state of NY,intends to phillabuster it, to be certain it doesnt happen.
Oh, that would be Chuck Schumer, for those who dont know.

Tom, who hopes someday to leave the great state of NY, for a more gun friendly state.

Oh... A New York senator.. go figure! :mad:
 
Amen to that!

If my Marriage and Driver's license is valid from state to state, so should my CCW.

You'll want to be careful with that one.
In TN we have a constitutional amendment that basically forbids gay marriage. Two guys moving here from MA will find their marriage certificate useless. And I like it that way.

On the bill, people on the right raise objections from states' rights. Somehow I think we've gotten past that and I won't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. It would be great if this bill gets passed. But somehow Im not quite ready to open carry down 5th Avenue in NYC. I just suspect the law and its enforcement will be two very different things.
 
Didn't see the report, but I heard on Fox that Sen Thune was attaching a reciprocity amendment onto some other bill, though "I can't recall":confused: what the bill was. It's tough getting old.:rolleyes:

Attached to S. 1390 National Defense Authorization Act.

The U.S. Senate is now considering the National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1390). As a part of the consideration of that legislation, Senators John Thune (R-SD) and David Vitter (R-LA) will offer an amendment to provide for interstate recognition of Right-to-Carry permits. There will be a Senate floor vote on this important and timely pro-gun reform on Wednesday, July 22. Please call your U.S. Senators at 202-224-3121 and ask them to support the Thune-Vitter interstate Right-to-Carry reciprocity amendment.
 
Gosh, folks, I figure a state line means something to somebody other than Rand-McNally. If the good people of Texas want to order their lives one way, and the good people of Massachusetts want to order their lives another way, I really believe we ought to respect their wishes. Least of all do I want the Federal Government claiming to have the power to tell those people in those states what to do. I could go on, but I'll stop here.
 
Sadly, my Senior Senator from the great state of NY,intends to phillabuster it, to be certain it doesnt happen.
Oh, that would be Chuck Schumer, for those who dont know.

Tom, who hopes someday to leave the great state of NY, for a more gun friendly state.

Me too, Tom.
I'm sorry this poor excuse for a Senator is spreading his disease upon the rest of America.
 
Living on a tri-state border, I can tell you it's pretty annoying that I can't even go to Shop Rite 5 minutes away in NJ or across the bridge a couple of blocks from here into NY.

As if crossing the street would turn me into a raving lunatic and the good people of Port Jervis and Montague would be in danger.
 
I particularly like this quote from the Fox story:

"If you walk down the street in New York ... you can have the solace of knowing that if someone has a gun on them they've gone through a rigorous police background check. After this bill, you can have no such comfort," Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said Sunday."

Schumer is such a shmuck. I guess even the criminals go through a rigorous background check.

Bill
 
Claiming this is a states rights issue is the same as saying that the gun laws in CA, IL, etc are all perfectly acceptable and don't violate the second amendment, which of course, only reaffirms ones god given right to self-defense.
 
The Associated Press, July 22, 2009

WASHINGTON — In a rare win for gun control advocates, the Senate on Wednesday rejected a measure allowing a person with a concealed weapon permit in one state to also hide his firearm when visiting another state.

The vote was 58-39 in favor of the provision establishing concealed carry permit reciprocity in the 48 states that have concealed weapons laws. That fell two votes short of the 60 needed to approve the measure, offered as an amendment to a defense spending bill.

Opponents prevailed in their argument that the measure violated states rights by forcing states with stringent requirements for permits to recognize concealed weapons carriers from states that give out permits to almost any gun owner.

“This is no minor shift in policy,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., whose state requires people to be fingerprinted, get gun training and to undergo a federal background check before issuing permits. “It in fact would be a sweeping change and I think with some deadly consequences.”

The vote reversed recent trends where Republicans and gun rights Democrats from rural states joined to push pro-gun rights issues and block gun control legislation.

Congress this year voted to restore the rights of people to carry loaded weapons into national parks and the Senate moved to effectively eviscerate the tough gun control laws of the District of Columbia.

Congress has also ignored urgings from President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to revive a ban on military-style weapons that expired in 2004.

The concealed weapons measure, promoted by the National Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America, would have made a concealed weapon permit from one state valid in the 47 other states with permit laws. Only Wisconsin and Illinois have no carry permit laws.

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., the sponsor, said it would not provide for a national carry permit, and that a visitor to another state would have to obey the limitations of that state, such as bans on concealed weapons in restaurants or other places.

“Law-abiding individuals have the right to self-defense,” even when they cross state lines, Thune said, citing the example of truck drivers who need to protect themselves as they travel.

Opponents, however, said the 48 states with permits have a broad range of conditions for obtaining those permits: some such as Alaska and Vermont, give permits to almost all gun owners. Others, such as New York, have firearm training requirements and exclude people with drinking problems or criminal records.

New York Democrat Charles Schumer raised the possibility of his state having to accept gun carriers from states that have few or no restrictions. Thune’s proposal, he said, was “the most dangerous piece of legislation to the safety of Americans when it comes to guns since the repeal of the assault weapons ban.”

Thune shot back that if a person from South Dakota with a carry permit visited Central Park in New York City, “Central Park will be a much safer place.”

Other opponents said the proposal infringed on states’ rights, usually an important principle for gun rights groups. Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., said it would override the laws of 11 states — California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon and Rhode Island — and the District of Columbia — which do not allow carry permit reciprocity with other states.

Sen. David Vitter, R-La., another sponsor, reminded his colleagues that the NRA and Gun Owners of America were scoring the vote, meaning it would be considered in their election evaluation of lawmakers.

NRA chief lobbyist Chris W. Cox said the last two decades have shown a strong shift toward gun rights laws. “We believe it’s time for Congress to acknowledge these changes and respect the right of self-defense, and the right of self-defense does not stop at state lines,” he said.

Gun control groups were strongly in opposition.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence said Mississippi residents can get a permit without any training, including ever shooting a pistol on a range. These permit holders could carry firearms in New York City, where police have broad discretion to deny permits, or Dallas, where permit applicants must undergo at least 10 hours of training.

“It is critical to our efforts that people who enter our state abide by the laws of our state which have supported the progress we are making,” Newark, N.J., mayor Cory Booker said in a statement. “This is not a law that will in any way support our efforts to create a safer Newark.”
 
Back
Top