Coated Keith bullets?

SLT223

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
5,388
Maybe my google skills are weak. Does anyone make coated 250gr .44 hardcast or 160gr .357 coated Keith style bullets?
 
Register to hide this ad
Well MBC calls them Elmer K bullets but they're not true Keith style.

I tried these a couple years ago & got inconsistent quality on the HT coating & had leading issues on two calibers. He told me they fixed that problem but the .500 bullets I ordered next had the same issue so I quit buying from them. Maybe they have fixed their coating issues now.

Acme Bullets has the same style 240 LSWC-HT bullet. I liked their quality better on the ones I tried.

Any 250gr bullets... I don't know though.

.

Missouri Bullets 452-250HT & 430-240HT
medium800.jpg


.
 
Last edited:
I've had some problem...

I've had some problems with other bullet casters, too. Especially 'powder' coatigs. I"ve had good luck with Missouri through, and Bayou too. And yeah, I haven't measured them to see if they are anywhere near actual Keith proportions. Maybe we can find some closer to the real thing. I'm not sure how close the OP needs, OP? Whatcha say?


PS I took a close look at the Missouries and yeah, there are two driving bands and a bevel base. And the groove is rounded instead of square. The large meplat is the closest thing to a Keith that it has.
 
Last edited:
Anyone finds a coated TRUE Keith 44 bullet let us know.
All I have found have those stupid bevel bases.
Most also do not have a true Keith full width leading band in front of the crimp groove.
Or a square bottomed lube groove
ACME (which is kind of local to me) has an extreme bevel base.
There are true Keith bullets being made but none are coated I know of.
44 Mag, Lyman 429421, 255gr, SWC-K (Authentic Keith) - Montana Bullet Works
 
Last edited:
Even many of the Lyman 429421 molds are not true Keith type bullets because the have a round grease groove instead of a square one. My mold manufactured in the 1980's does have the square bottom grease groove. So, at least some of the later production is correct relative to Keith's design.

As far as the pictured Missouri Bullets .44 SWC being a true Keith design, it's not even close. They can say what they want but folks who know what they're looking at......

Bruce
 
Montana Bullets....

Montana Bullets has a genuine looking Keith, but they aren't coated. And I'm not sure the double ogive is there. If nothing better turns up maybe you can get them to supply them unlubed and coat them yourself.

They MAY be able to supply them coated if you ask.

Beartooth has lubed and gas checked but the proportions look really good.

Penn Bullets WAS getting into coated (I bought some) but I don't see any sign of it on their site.

Chey cast makes one but it does't look like an authentic Keith either.
 
Last edited:
Take a look at Badman bullets, any questions you have regarding the quality or use call them, good people and I have had their 38's and 45's and they have been excellent.
Karl
 
Looks like they (Badman) are using the same "Keith" mould as ACME:
Thin leading band and a heavy bevel base.
If you are coating it, the lube groove design is irrelevant.
 
"Kieth" bullets will be difficult to find from commercial casters; 2 reasons, a square bottomed lube groove bullet won't normally drop out of a mod as easily as a rounded or tapered lube groove. Same with the base, a beveled base is easier to cast than a square base. Besides, in real life there isn't that much difference between a "true" Kieth and say a 429421...
 
Beartooth makes excellent bullets.
I have shot several of their 44 slugs but never that one.
It looks pretty close to the original design with the possible exception of the nose profile.
Their heavy gas checked bullets are popular with the 444 crowd.
 
Magnus Bullets sells 250gr Keith bullets. I've loaded up quite a few but haven't shot them yet.

If leading is an issue for me I plan to strip the bullet lube and powder coat the ones I have left.
 
What a thing to do to the "perfect" bullet.

Keith was more than a little innovative for his time. If coatings were available, he would have messed with them. He messed with everything else. I doubt a person as perceptive as Elmer Keith would have been blind to the benefits of coated lead. All speculation of course. I was merely hoping someone was making a good bullet better on a commercial scale.
 
Last edited:
Beartooth has lubed and gas checked but the proportions look really good.

True Keith designs, regardless of caliber will never have round grease grooves, bevel bases or gas checks. Hensley & Gibbs' molds are generally true to Keith's concepts. They are:

H&G #43 in .38 caliber
H&G #258 in .41 caliber
H&G #503 in .44 caliber
H&G #501 in .45 (Colt)caliber

Bruce
 
Toss the "Kieth" name, they are just lead semi-wadcutters. The original true Kieth bullet has been changed by everyone that has made molds for it, a slight change in angle here a bit smaller/larger there, some even added gaschecks. All are good...

BTW; Beartooth Bullets is an excellent company with excellent products. I buy bullets that I don't have a mold for, some just to try out, some because I don't use enough to justify buying a mold...
 
Last edited:
Toss the "Kieth" name, they are just lead semi-wadcutters. The original true Kieth bullet has been changed by everyone that has made molds for it, a slight change in angle here a bit smaller/larger there, some even added gaschecks. All are good...

Not hardly. It is true that there are other excellent SWC designs such as a couple of those designed by Ray Thompson but to say one SWC is just as good as another is nonsense.

Bruce
 
Nine hundred ninety-nine reloaders/shooters/hunters out of 1,000 cannot tell the difference between a "true Kieth" bullet or any of the many copies/variations either in accuracy, effects on game, or shooting qualities. Maybe during a close inspection with measuring tools and blueprints of each bullet some could find differences. Perhaps Keith himself could tell the difference from his original design and a Lyman 429421, but I am sure no one reading this forum could...

Perhaps someone could preform a test, side by side between a "true Kieth" and say a 429421 or any of the clones. A few hundred rounds of each then a "blind test" where the shooter did not know hat is chambered. I don't have that much interest in this subject as my Lyman 429421, my "Thompson design" 44 cal w/gascheck and my RCBS LSWC are very accurate in my 4, .44 Magnum handguns...
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top