shouldazagged
Absent Comrade
I need to do some reading on this; but I'm very tired tonight, so I'll throw out a two-part question to you guys.
What is the stated theory behind the digital camo worn by our military personnel these days? And more importantly, how well does it work?
I'm old-school, and have used nothing later than some late WWII surplus and woodland patterns and a little very early Realtree stuff. It always seemed to me that a more contrasty design that would break up the human outline was what worked best. I always wondered how effective the Vietnam-era tiger stripe pattern worked--looked as if it would be pretty good in jungle conditions.
For the life of me I can't see how the digital camo works, especially when it has some wear and fading.
I've read claims that in fact it doesn't work well, and if true that concerns me for our people in combat.
What's your experience and/or opinion?
What is the stated theory behind the digital camo worn by our military personnel these days? And more importantly, how well does it work?
I'm old-school, and have used nothing later than some late WWII surplus and woodland patterns and a little very early Realtree stuff. It always seemed to me that a more contrasty design that would break up the human outline was what worked best. I always wondered how effective the Vietnam-era tiger stripe pattern worked--looked as if it would be pretty good in jungle conditions.
For the life of me I can't see how the digital camo works, especially when it has some wear and fading.
I've read claims that in fact it doesn't work well, and if true that concerns me for our people in combat.
What's your experience and/or opinion?