Final Update: I DID buy this rare Model 56

Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
13,042
Reaction score
7,504
Location
Orange County, CA
UPDATE 2/11/2012: After thinking carefully about all the points raised in the very thoughtful comments on my initial post, I went ahead and bought the gun. The price was VERY good, much less than I thought it would be, and less even than some of the more conservative valuations suggested.

I'm going to tear the gun apart, clean it up, and reassemble it. It needs proper early '60s PC Magna stocks, but I'll get those somewhere. Then it will go in my shooting rotation. For reasons offered in the thread below, this may be a rare gun but it is not necessarily a guaranteed high-value collectible because of the uncertainty over possible erasure of a stamp asserting government ownership. I have no doubt that it is a legitimate model 56, as the frame contains metal that would have been milled or polished away if this was a fake based on some other model. It's a 56, period. I will letter it to document what can be said about it from the company records. (The price was so good that I didn't feel the need to demand a letter from the seller before I agreed to take it.)

Thank you all for your comments. Even if you think I didn't listen to you, I did -- then made my decision based on the totality of info available to me.

= = = = = = = = = =

UPDATE 2/8/12 : After all the good responses generated by my original post, I have decided to toss the ball back in the owner's court. I will continue to be interested if he letters it and sets an opening price that reflects the gun's condition and lack of government marking, but otherwise I expect I will move on and look for something else.

= = = = = = = = = =

(This is where the original post of 2/7/12 started.)

The owner of this Model 56 is willing to sell it and has invited me to make an offer. He declined to put a price on it himself, but knows that the Blue Book values these guns at $7500 NIB down to $2200 in 60% condition.

Apologies for the sort of basic photos and harsh lighting. I used a cell-phone camera under shop lights.

WP_000054.jpg


WP_000049.jpg


WP_000052.jpg


WP_000051.jpg


WP_000055.jpg


About 15,000 of these were made for the Air Force in 1962-1963, and apparently all but a very few were crushed. SCSW quotes prices that are consistent with the Blue Book scale, which makes me think the Blue Book used SCSW for value assessment, SCSW reports that guns in the 80-90% range have sold for $4000-5000.

I think his gun is about 70%, and I am tempted to offer $2500 for it. It seems to be a righteous Model 56. The only thing at odds with the standard definition is the lack of a U.S. stamp on the smooth backstrap. Perhaps it was once there but was polished off; the backstrap seems to my eyes to have no blue on it at all; it is down to bare steel. But the steel does not seem dished or flatter than it should be, and there are no ghost impressions where a stamp might have been removed.

The serial number is in the right range, the sight and rib configuration is correct, the barrel looks right compared to photos in SWCA. I don't think this is a fake.

The stocks are obviously wrong. The gun would have shipped with diamond magnas, not the post-1968 wood on the gun now.

The gun is mechanically sound -- tight action, no push-off, timing fine, lock-up fine, barrel and chambers slightly frosty but not neglected.

I am not usually a collector of military models, but I am attracted by the rarity of this one. Also, I think snubnose .38s are inherently cool, and adjustable sights just make them cooler.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
This is where "collector crazy" comes into play, because the ONLY reason you would consider paying that much it is because it is stamped "MOD 56" instead of "MOD 15". :confused: Other than the stamp (and presumed history) this gun seems identical to an M15 snubby. Why does S&W do this to us?
 
Last edited:
David,
Amoskeag had the following sell for $4,025 on 3/26/11
Smith & Wesson Model 56 KTX-38 U.S.A.F. Revolver

serial #K506803, 38 Special, 2" barrel with an excellent bore. This pinned and recessed revolver has 95-97% of the original blue finish remaining with mild silvering on and around the muzzle, edges of the frame, and along the front and rear faces of the cylinder. Additionally, the "U.S." marked smooth backstrap has some mild freckling along its length which is also on the frontstrap. The hammer and trigger have bright color case-hardening with some minor freckling visible. The checkered, diamond-center PC grips are numbered to the gun on the interior and are in near excellent overall condition with some mild handling marks around the butt and some flattening of the points. These revolvers were manufactured in the early 1960’s on special order to specific U.S.A.F. requirements and are a true rarity with almost all of the 15,205 gun production run destroyed by the government. This example is in fine overall condition and would make a great addition to any U.S. military or Smith & Wesson collection. (74108-15) {C&R} (3500/5000) SOLD FOR $4025.00
 
DC , without the presence of the U.S. marking I would personally
value it at 1/2 of a comparable marked and condition gun.

I don't know where this puts you money wise.
But without the proper markings I would want a factory letter before any money changed hands.

In my brief experience the U.S. property mark is almost as valuable
as the gun itself.

Good luck
Allen
 
Just out of curiosity, why we're the majority crushed/destroyed by the government?


chuck
 
If the owner is not going to place a value on it, then I would "low ball" an offer and see what he counters with, and then go from there.
 
I collect some US military and am troubled by the lack of proper markings. Should the gun also have a small bursting bomb cartouch somewhere? Add in the aftermarket grips and I'm losing my nerve fast. Perhaps a guarantee of a factory letter stating it was indeed shipped to the USAF as a condition of sale?

I also do not understand what made this a model 56 as opposed to a M-15? These were certainly not the ones withthe aluminum cylinders. So what "specifications" did the AF demand?
 
I'd have to agree with Allen-frame and Retired LTC.
If I had a gun with that kind of value it would have been lettered already, and I would not consider spending any money over what a similar model 15 would be worth UNTIL I, me, myself got a factory letter. I'm not calling it a fake and you should not call it a fake either, I'm just saying protect your investment. You might even tell the seller you want it lettered and if it letters as what he says, you will pay for the service and if it does not letter as a 56 it is on him.
All of this is easy to say from here as I do not have the fever.
 
We're all aware there are fakes out and about. I wound't call it a fake, but I'd sure call Roy and see if he thinks its real or not. I'm just a bit put out by the lack of serrations on the backstrap. I don't have access to a known real one, but the vast majority of target revolvers from this time frame have them. Failing that, call Lee or David Carroll and have a chat with them. Once you start paying collector grade prices for a gun in well worn condition, you need to be sure (or really loaded with $$$).
 
I'm really uncomfortable with a dealer who wants me to get into an auction with myself. I think if you bid first you loose. It's his gun he should know what he needs for it. Just my opinion and the way I like to deal.

Leo
 
  • Like
Reactions: tck
In general I won't make an offer on something if the seller won't establish some sort of asking price. The lack of the U.S. stamp and him not setting a price on it would make me a bit paranoid of it. If you really want to consider buying it, I would offer him a conditional lowball; a VERY low price as is, and then a higher, more reasonable price if he would get a little from S&W verifying it's provenance. You might offer to split or pay the cost of the letter if it proves to be a legit 56.
 
Just my opinion, I think that kind of money could be put to better use somewhere else. Lots of "issues" with this one. Best wishes for a successful outcome for you.
 
Just out of curiosity, why we're the majority crushed/destroyed by the government?


chuck

Chuck;

Depending on the prevailing political winds, there is a USG policy that no guns will be sold to civilians. Sometimes this means surplus firearms are put into storage. With certain administrations, they are destroyed. Obviously, full-auto gun sales are out of the question, but look at the long history of 1911s, M13 Aircrewmans, etc. found chopped or torched into little pieces. Apparently the CS-1 686s of the 1980s met this fate also, but I've never heard of or seen these in little pieces. Sad but true.
 
Thank you all for the wise cautions. My enthusiasms have kind of run away with me for the last couple of months, and it's good to have people bring me up short.

I will explain my (that is, your) concerns to the seller and see if he is willing to document the gun and set a price that reflects the realities of condition and lack of proper marking. So with both caution and hope I am keeping the door open; I will report back if a deal breaks out at a later date.

I trust the seller, by the way. I have bought several guns from him in the last three years, including other uncommon revolvers and boxed high-condition early specimens -- often at very good prices.
 
The model stamp looks correct.
The butt number looks correct.

Is the rear sight smooth?

I can't tell about the backstrap from your pic. I will say that it is easy to grind a mark and re-contour the backstrap.
See my pic of a 38/44 that once had "Washington State Patrol" on the backstrap.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3595.jpg
    IMG_3595.jpg
    52.1 KB · Views: 378
Last edited:
Yes, rear sight is smooth, not grooved. What I observed on the gun is completely compliant with the Model 56 description except for the wrong stocks and the missing government stamp.

I also noted that the gun has a grooved trigger. I don't remember reading a specification for that but guessed it was correct. I still need to do a lot of work on smooth vs. grooved standard-width triggers. I never know which models have them and which models don't.
 
I did not see the original post, and I know very little about the model 56, just what Ive read as I have not seen one in person. I would definetly have him get it lettered before giving any money. If he is reluctant because of the $50 cost, I would offer to pay for the letter, or go ahead and order it yourself if really interested in acquiring it. This is done on Colts all the time before large purchases are made, and you've already got the serial number/info. If he refuses to order the letter with your money, that gives you the answer in itself. I personally would rate the gun about 50%-60%. If the above revolver with original numbered stocks, is 95-97%, then I would think this gun would be worth about 35-40% of that gun IF it letters, jmho. Of course the above gun might be worth more now than what it sold for.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top