Humpback M&P?

Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
1,011
Reaction score
2,605
Location
Virginia
Buying absentee based on poor photos and description is always an adventure. I found a 5" M&P, s/n 684xxx, represented as caliber .38 S&W. So far, it seemed to be an early British Service Revolver with commercial stocks. The hammer, however, gave hints of being interesting.
mqCpvcd.jpg


When the gun arrived, it was caliber .38 S&W SPECIAL. All matching, including the stocks. I cannot imagine anyone ordering a humpback M&P. That leaves the fitter grabbing the wrong hammer or a later replacement. I suspect the latter, as the hammer may have been blued at one time. Is this a factory humpback?
8q1c4gl.jpg


Bob
 
Register to hide this ad
It could be, as the HBHs were available in the years immediately before WWII. A letter might indicate that it shipped with one. Your 684xxx probably shipped in 1940.
 
OH yeah, it looks like a good one. I have an M&P Target that shipped like that and its in the same serial # range. Treat it well, it deserves it.
 
I have also seen K frames with humpback hammers that lettered.

Humpback hammer on K frame (much higher than on N frames):
orig.jpg

Jim:

That little guy right there is one sweeeeeeet package!!!:cool::D:)

Tell me that has had some customization over the years... There has to be a story on that one - you cannot just post a photo like that without the Paul Harvey rest of the story...please? With the mushroom knob, isn't it a little early to have an HBH from the factory?
 
Last edited:
Jim:

That little guy right there is one sweeeeeeet package!!!:cool::D:)

Tell me that has had some customization over the years... There has to be a story on that one - you cannot just post a photo like that without the Paul Harvey rest of the story...please? With the mushroom knob, isn't it a little early to have an HBH from the factory?


More info here:Need some help with this revolver...
 
Jim:

That little guy right there is one sweeeeeeet package!!!:cool::D:)

Tell me that has had some customization over the years... There has to be a story on that one - you cannot just post a photo like that without the Paul Harvey rest of the story...please? With the mushroom knob, isn't it a little early to have an HBH from the factory?

I'm afraid my post was misleading, sorry. The 1st line is not related to the 2nd line and the photo.
 
I had always wondered about the "why" of a HBH. I suppose it was because that the shape lends itself to easier thumb cocking for single action firing. While that design might be worthwhile on a target revolver, I don't see much point in having one on a service-type revolver not designed nor used for competitive target shooting.
 
Maybe not everyone went for the HBH because of its purported SA target shooting advantage. If you had the kind of hand or used a grip that let a roll of skin ride up above the knuckle and get painfully pinched by the standard hammer in DA shooting, maybe you would want a hammer that is a looser fit to the frame in the instant before the DA sear disengages.

I'm not a big fan of HB hammers for SA shooting, but I have them on a couple of revolvers. That higher hammer spur is a long way up there for my thumbs, so I find the standard hammer preferable.
 
If I had a revolver with a HBH (I do not), I'd probably replace it with a conventional hammer for shooting purposes, and store the HBH safely away against the day I sell it.
 
Back
Top