There are three points to the original post
- Stock Price
- Sales of product line segments
- Hunting revolvers
Stock price has very little or no correlation with
factual sales, market share or profits for any company. It does however, have to do with how well the company and the stock may be promoted to investors.
I do not claim to interpret or understand stock and how it works...and since it has no
intrinsic value, I stay away from it.
Secondly, they don't have a way to break down the segments of their product line by "use," such as hunting and self-defense. It is possible to take a look at the BATFE records by company on revolvers made by caliber, but it won't say model or barrel length. Also, those public records are always about three years behind.
Lastly, people that handgun hunt are in a very, very small minority. I'd venture to say that more people hunt [large game-deer, etc.] with muzzle loaders than handguns. So, 2.8% down in production of "hunting handguns," even if it could be attributed to such a niche market, would be a drop in the bucket.
In concluding, I would say to concentrate on the number of hunting licenses sold per state, which in most cases, have been declining in numbers as has been for many years. I think this is another reason that there are large numbers of hunting rifles sitting on dealer shelves that they cannot readily move. If hunting rifles, muzzle loaders and hunting shotguns aren't moving, it just goes to reason to say that hunting handguns aren't moving...but they are such a small part of the market, I doubt anyone would be concerned.
I just pulled all of this out of my...ahem...
So, take it for what it's worth.
Would you like a good deal on the Brooklyn Bridge too?
