I just had a weird thought.....

Now this is a revelation....

I'm watching O.B.I.T. and the military head just told the investigating senator that he was facing a tough election back home and it would be a shame if he were accused of undermining the nations security......


THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WAS DONE TO SEN. FRANK CHURCH, ten years later than this show. He was head of the committee to investigate the CIA. He exposed assassinations. overthrows of governments for private interests and a plethora of other ills that we now only know about because of his work. But he was decried at the top levels of government as attacking our national security.

On the show they also found out the these supposedly 'top secret' machines are in industry, education, communication and they don't really know how many exist.:eek:

When I was a kid I was told that watching shows like this was 'silly junk'. :confused: <===hmmmmmmm.

I will say, however, that at the time, if it wasn't for the 'alien requirement' of science fiction, it never occured to me that this could actually happen.
 
Last edited:
That couldn't happen.....

What I am getting is this quote by Washington " However political parties may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion. "

He goes on to make the case that "the alternate domination" of one party over another and coinciding efforts to exact revenge upon their opponents have led to horrible atrocities, and "is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism." From Washington's perspective and judgment, political parties eventually and "gradually incline the minds of men to seek security… in the absolute power of an individual",[2] leading to despotism. He acknowledges the fact that parties are sometimes beneficial in promoting liberty in monarchies, but he argues that political parties must be restrained in a popularly elected government because of their tendency to distract the government from their duties, create unfounded jealousies among groups and regions, raise false alarms among the people, promote riots and insurrection,[peacock prose] and provide foreign nations and interests access to the government where they can impose their will upon the country.

...could it???:(
 

Latest posts

Back
Top