The case in a nut shell:
Guys go to the range. They leave and are sitting in the plaintiff's car.
Defendant wants to buy plaintiff's 1911.
Plaintiff is willing to sell.
Defendant picks up gun and shoots plaintiff in both legs with one round. Says he was only dropping the hammer and thought the gun was empty.
Plaintiff sues for medical (I don't think punitive was even involved).
Judge Judy awards him half --- Says plaintiff is 1/2 responsible for bringing the gun to the scene in the first place.
Defendant argued throughout the *trial* that he knows and always practices firearm safety.
Idiot plaintiff never disputed the above.
Judge Judy didn't have the slightest idea.
I say the judge blew it - Defendant's fault all the way.
Guys go to the range. They leave and are sitting in the plaintiff's car.
Defendant wants to buy plaintiff's 1911.
Plaintiff is willing to sell.
Defendant picks up gun and shoots plaintiff in both legs with one round. Says he was only dropping the hammer and thought the gun was empty.
Plaintiff sues for medical (I don't think punitive was even involved).
Judge Judy awards him half --- Says plaintiff is 1/2 responsible for bringing the gun to the scene in the first place.
Defendant argued throughout the *trial* that he knows and always practices firearm safety.
Idiot plaintiff never disputed the above.
Judge Judy didn't have the slightest idea.
I say the judge blew it - Defendant's fault all the way.