I live in Kitsap county, and we have a sheriffs department that goes by KCSO. Across the water is King County Sheriffs Office. So really, it could be from anywhere.
I am neither a Glock lover or hater- I know several people that carry them exclusively and are well protected. I bought a G17 back in 1986, which I had until 2004. I had a G29SF and a G20SF for about ten years, and the G20SF remains as my hiking gun. However, if Smith or Sig ever come out with a striker 10mm it goes up for sale.
I'm of the opinion that one should carry the Glock grip angle or the standard grip angle. When I draw and aim, the sights on my Smiths, Sigs, Springfield, and 1911s are more-or-less lined up with the target, but with the Glock I'm pointing way high- high enough to miss. The Glock requires major realignment to get the sights on target, then some more movement to fine tune. All the others require only tiny movements to fine-tune the front into the rear. If there isn't time to make a major readjustment and a fine tune, I stand a much higher chance of a miss. For ME it's one or the other, but not both. I know some people aren't bothered by it (or haven't considered it) so I'm not going to start bashing their guns, but I sure wish they had fixed that grip angle way back when people started complaining about it.