I was going over the Lucky Gunner data for a 3.5" 9mm for SD ammo
and noticed that there was a pretty big jump from a Standard loading, up to a +P loading.
The standard 115 Gold Dot was only listed at a light 1143fps
while I have the factory stuff in my C9 chrony at 1208fps.
For me the larger 124 Gold Dot is harded for me to get high fps
but in a little 3" it will match the 115's ME at 340, which is a good thing.
Luck Gunner has the standard 124 Gold Dot at only 1080fps which seem very low for a SD loading.
I felt a lot better when my C9 showed it could do 1140fps that matched
a lot of the internet postings.
My question is...........
has anyone found the low end, "Standard load" working out for them
over the higher fps +P factory loading, and what barrel length?
I might like to buy some standard ammo but with the prices of today,
I would like to see if this is a good idea, before hitting the stores,
for ammo to test in my 3", 3.5" & 5" 9mm pistols.
Thanks for any help.
and noticed that there was a pretty big jump from a Standard loading, up to a +P loading.
The standard 115 Gold Dot was only listed at a light 1143fps
while I have the factory stuff in my C9 chrony at 1208fps.
For me the larger 124 Gold Dot is harded for me to get high fps
but in a little 3" it will match the 115's ME at 340, which is a good thing.
Luck Gunner has the standard 124 Gold Dot at only 1080fps which seem very low for a SD loading.
I felt a lot better when my C9 showed it could do 1140fps that matched
a lot of the internet postings.
My question is...........
has anyone found the low end, "Standard load" working out for them
over the higher fps +P factory loading, and what barrel length?
I might like to buy some standard ammo but with the prices of today,
I would like to see if this is a good idea, before hitting the stores,
for ammo to test in my 3", 3.5" & 5" 9mm pistols.
Thanks for any help.