M&P Shield Plus - Known Issues

CouchPotato

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 25, 2022
Messages
190
Reaction score
282
Some of you are aware of the problems that I've been having with my Shield Plus Performance Center which is currently back in for warranty service again. It's been quite the learning experience and during this process, I've joined various S&W fan groups on Facebook, I've spoken with many people about what's going on, and I've dug around online a little more.

Edit: Please note, I'm speaking exclusively about the Shield Plus, not the Shield 2.0, and not any other M&P model.

The more I search, the more I find. As it turns out, many others have been having the same issues as I have, as well as other issues, and some have also had negative experiences with S&W's customer service and also their warranty department, much like I have.

Due to the information about all of this being scattered around the internet and because the various issues appear to be widespread and ongoing, I think it's a good idea to begin compiling a list of them. If you're aware of anything that I've missed, please post below.

Please inspect your Shield Plus. If you've got a good one then it's likely going to be a rock solid performer.

Hopefully Smith & Wesson gets their act together soon. These issues are real, they're caused by a lack of quality control, and in many cases they have the potential to get someone killed, especially if they're relying on a Shield Plus to defend themselves. One of them possibly creates the potential for an uncommanded discharge, specifically the plunger reset issue.


Known issues:


Deformed trigger bar - In this case, the trigger bar fails to fully engage the sear, specifically only the corners of each meet instead of the trigger bar getting underneath the sear, which then prevents the gun from firing, especially after the corner of the trigger bar and/or sear wear down.

Failure to Feed - Some have reported enormous FTF issues with the Shield Plus, even with mutiple magazines to test with. For others the gun eats everything you feed it.

Safety Plunger won't reset - In this case, the safety plunger won't reset by itself after the trigger is pulled. Upon cycling, so far what I've seen is the sear does move the striker out of the way, allowing for the plunger to reset. However, because the plunger won't reset on its own like it's supposed to, the potential exists for it to not reset at all, even with cycling. Possibly that's already happening to people and they don't even know it. This ongoing defect has been reported by people for over two years now.

Inertial trigger saftey dingus prevents a trigger pull - This appears to happen for two reasons. One is because its not designed correctly, flat out, its not. Specifically the pivot point is too low in the trigger shoe and/or because the dingus itself is too flush with the middle of the trigger shoe. Second, in some cases the spring weight for the dingus is too high, which then prevents the nub from clearing the frame in back of the trigger in time. The result is that it requires you to press the bottom most point of the trigger in order to operate. It's a trigger and a deliberate pull should result in the gun firing without searching for a magical sweet spot in the trigger.

Optic wont adjust for elevation - Obviously this applies to optics ready versions. In some cases S&W has milled the slide at too much of a pitch or angle, which then falls outside the range for elevation adjustment on the dot.

Retention pins walking out - This appears to mostly apply to the pin in the trigger shoe.

Can't load last round in magazine - This is due to the spring binding on the follower which prevents full compression. Also a design issue. Shaving plastic out of a certain place under the follower fixes the issue.

Empty magazine won't lock the slide - Stretching the magazine spring fixes the issue until you compress the spring again by reloading the magazine. This might be a heat treat issue on the spring.

Guide rod stuck after reassembly - Let's be honest here, this one is 95% user error however, on the Shield Plus it appears easier to knock the guide rod out of alignment during reassembly than it does on the Shield 2.0

Very gritty trigger - This goes beyond the typical trigger bar and plunger interface. Some have reported that they've found metallic burs and/or machine marks in the hole for the safety plunger and/or striker channel.

Slide stop / slide release issues - This is famously known for being difficult to operate, especially at first when attempting to use it as a slide release. After examining multiple copies of the gun myself, I can definitely say that it's inconsistent from one Shield Plus to the next and my Shield 2.0 works effortlessly as a slide release.

Light primer strikes - While many or most light primer strike issues can be blamed on hard primers in cheap ammo, some copies of the Shield apparently have a weak striker spring. This issue has been validated by taking the rounds from three brands of ammo, including Federal, that failed to fire, putting them a different gun, and they fired. After the striker spring was replaced in the Shield, the issue went away.

Magazine Spacer Split In Half - On extended OEM magazines (more than 10rds) the plastic spacer above the base plate can split in half, even without being dropped.

If I've missed anything, please post below.

I do understand that everything that's man-made has a defect rate and every company has their share of QC issues here and there. With the wide range of issues happening on the Shield Plus, the obvious nature of some, the volume of people having them, as well as the length of time they've been happening, there's just no excuses. The inherent design of the Shield Plus should be allowing S&W to dominate the micro 9mm category, but they're not, and the QC issues are undermining S&W's reputation and are destroying the brand. The poor customer service and outright incompetence in the repair department exacerbate the issue.
 
Last edited:
Who pee'd in your wheaties? You compiled every internet rumor you could and presented it as fact even though you don't know. You only know what issues you've had with YOUR gun. I noticed you did relate what issue you actually had. You should stick to "just the facts".
 
Last edited:
Who pee'd in your wheaties? You compiled every internet rumor you could and presented it as fact even though you don't know. You only know what issues you've had with YOUR gun. I noticed you did relate what issue you actually had. You should stick to "just the facts".


I am sticking to the facts and I'm not talking about rumors. When I see videos and pictures from different people who are reporting the same issue, it's hard to say that it's simply a rumor.

I've personally had more than one issue and my Shield Plus is going through service for a fourth time in a row.

I remember when the Sig P320s started having uncommanded discharges, the Sig fan boys and shills were in denial about it, and attacked anyone who didn't say something positive about the Sig P320... so attack away. I don't care.

When these issues happen to you and Smith & Wesson customer service treats you like trash by yelling and hanging up, more than once, then replaces defective parts with more defective parts, and also causes further damage to your gun, you'd lose enthusiasm for the brand as well.

The actual rumors out there are that the Shield Plus is a quality product, that S&W is good at making guns, and that they take care of their customers. Now I know that none of those things are true.

I'll still vouch for the design of the Shield Plus however S&W is failing miserably on execution. As a shareholder of Smith & Wesson, I blame executive leadership.
 
Out with it, man. Don't hold back, tell us what you REALLY think!

I am sure reports of your post at S&W headquarters have already caused several suicides...

Your sarcasm is not lost on me. I'm in agreement with you in believing that they don't care... which is the entire problem.
 
I had problems with my Shield Plus too. I don't trust or carry it. I'm not really a fan of any S&W semiautos other than my Shield 45 PC which also had a problem early on.
 
Reading your posts I'm reminded of an old saying. "There are three sides to every story. Yours, mine... and the facts". I have no problem with someone relating issues that they experienced. I've had some myself. But your post is full of rumor as in you weren't there. There is a reason why hearsay is not admissible in a courtroom. It's not that these issues don't exist but you tried to paint every v2.0 M&P has having them. Aren't you the guy that threatened to blackmail S&W? I'll bet they love you up there. So what exactly have your issues been?
 
Reading your posts I'm reminded of an old saying. "There are three sides to every story. Yours, mine... and the facts". I have no problem with someone relating issues that they experienced. I've had some myself. But your post is full of rumor as in you weren't there. There is a reason why hearsay is not admissible in a courtroom. It's not that these issues don't exist but you tried to paint every v2.0 M&P has having them. Aren't you the guy that threatened to blackmail S&W? I'll bet they love you up there. So what exactly have your issues been?

I'm speaking specifically of the Shield Plus and nothing else. Furthermore this is not a court of law.

I've had many of these issues myself in my Shield Plus, I have other copies of the Shield Plus available to me through my circle of friends, I've gone to multiple stores and examined their copies, I've talked to several dealers, I've examined video from others having these same issues, and I've spoken with many more people who are having the same issues.

When individual people in all corners of the internet are independently reporting the same issues, over and over, for months and years, eventually the claims from those people become credible, especially when they mirror some of my first hand experiences as well as what I've been told by some dealers.

On that note, I've edited my original post and added another to the list. Light primer strikes can easily be blamed on ammo, despite how many people have claimed to have issues, however an individual crossed my path with (what I deem to be) a credible circumstance. Here's the full text of what I just added.

Light primer strikes - While many or most light primer strike issues can be blamed on hard primers in cheap ammo, some copies of the Shield apparently have a weak striker spring. This issue has been validated by taking the rounds from three brands of ammo, including Federal, that failed to fire, putting them a different gun, and they fired. After the striker spring was replaced in the Shield, the issue went away

Meanwhile, I'll edit my original post and find a way to make it abundantly clear at the onset that I'm speaking specifically about the Shield Plus and not other M&P models.
 
Weird. No problems here. Probably still under 1000 rounds though.

Thats good. You probably have a good copy and like my old Shield 2.0, it'll probably last and last.

Like I said previously, I'll still vouch for the design of the Shield Plus. The problems are arising out of deficiencies in quality control and inconsistencies in S&W's manufacturing processes.
 
When these issues happen to you and Smith & Wesson customer service treats you like trash by yelling and hanging up, more than once, then replaces defective parts with more defective parts, and also causes further damage to your gun, you'd lose enthusiasm for the brand as well.

Just as a data point, I had a pin prone to "walking" on an M&P. Called S&W, talked to a guy for about 5 minutes who said they would send me a pin to try and if that did not work, let them know and they would send me a return label and take care of it. A few days later a pin arrived in the mail. I installed it and problem was solved.

Your comments about S&W customer service yelling at you and hanging up on you more than once does not fit with my experiences with them over the years, and kind of makes me question your objectivity on the rest of your post.

But I have no personal knowledge of the validity of those claimed problems.
 
Last edited:
Just as a data point, I had a pin prone to "walking" on an M&P. Called S&W, talked to a guy for about 5 minutes who said they would send me a pin to try and if that did not work, let them know and they would send me a return label and take care of it. A few days later a pin arrived in the mail. I installed it and problem was solved.

Your comments about S&W customer service yelling at you and hanging up on you more than once does not fit with my experiences with them over the years, and kind of makes me question your objectivity on the rest of your post.

But I have no personal knowledge of the validity of those claimed problems.

While I agree with the OP the S&W and the Shield are no longer the picture of reliability and I put them in the Taurus realm in that respect, I believe there has to be more to the story or embellishment with regards to Smith customer service hanging up and/or yelling over the phone. The issues the OP has listed are issues many independent individuals have had. The only non issue is with the slide stop. It's not a magazine release. This horse has been beat to death for about a decade now!

I've owned two Shield 1.0 9mm's, one 1.0 40s&w, two Shield 45s, and a Shield Plus for a total of 6 Shields. The 1.0s were flawless, my Shield 45's recoil assemble spring busted apart on a practically new gun only a few mags in which is unacceptable and inexcusable. Multiple Shield Plus magazines have QC issues, and the slide on my Shield Plus will get stuck locked back. It doesn't matter if their is rounds in the mag or the magazine is removed. The slide will NOT drop unless I pull the slide back while manually pushing the slide stop down. This happens randomly on basically a new gun.

I trust Taurus firearms about as much as I trust S&W firearms at this point. Their new semiautos and revolvers are hit or miss for problems. It's a game of Russian Roulette in whether you'll get a good one or not, but people will still buy them and give Smith a pass based on fanboyism, ignorance, and S&W's legacy. I've owned 6 Shields, 1 M&P 2.0 Compact, and 5 revolvers. I will probably still buy more revolvers, so this isn't me hating or bashing over a grudge or sour grapes. They just have a bunch of issue, and I don't think they care or most buyers care for that matter. They are publicly traded, so they just want to push out as many as possible for profit, and most consumers (myself included) will still keep buying them without holding them accountable with our dollars like we would with other manufacturers.
 
Last edited:
For me nothing worse than a company not standing behind their product. You make something defective and make it right with the customer is the way it should be.

The Shield Plus with the improperly milled optics slide seems to be a known issue. Smith tells me to contact the optics manufacturer after I explain the issues I have with my Shield Plus. Why should I contact two separate optics manufacturers when their optics worked perfectly on 3 other non Smith pistols?

Smith & Wesson lost a customer for life.
 
Failure to Feed
Empty magazine won't lock the slide
Very gritty trigger
Light primer strikes

These are issues for magazine-fed handguns in general, not the Shield Plus.

Also, let's do simple math. If we assume at there are 500,000 Shield+ models in circulation, at even a 1% failure rate, that means 5,000 Shield+ models are defective in some way. Out of that 5K, probably 4,500 are issues that are fixed with a replacement parts, and 500 are un-repairable.

The point is all gun makers put out defective products. Glock, H&K, Beretta, Colt etc. Your post assumes that all machines from reputable manufactures are always perfect... which has never been true no matter the industry.

And frankly, melodramatic posts are one thing, but recommending Taurus autoloaders over a S&W Shield is laughable.
 
I bought 4 handgun over the years at very reduced cost at an area forestry range off of ,, lets say owners that lacked experience in generalor lack the common sense to work thru an issue that could be an owner issue . 3 of those unreliable handguns ran fine after a detail cleaning , lubing were needed and use of a better ammo . One went home for some TLC and came back reliable now for 12 years as a carry handgun for a daughter .

Might have bought others if I did not have a range on our property now. Some that just look uncomfortable I will try to help but it can entertaining at times to just sit back and watch some handgun owners fumble around fill getting PO'd with new to them firearms or cheap junk problems prone ammo and just a lack of skills .

Yea, yea there are problems today and that well known what out some couchpotato running list of possible real problems and or owner issues . Might be best to cover your problems only.

Maybe I'll take a folding chair and go set at that ole forestry range again on a saturday and see if I bump into some mutt that wants to dump a shield plus for half price .
 
I have a Shield Pkus that’s been my daily carry since I purchased it in June of 2021. After about 1,500 rounds, I did encounter a problem where the slide would not remove for field stripping. This has been reported by others here and I believe it was a problem with the slide stop. The pistol was still otherwise functional.

So I made the phone call, received the return shipping label and sent it off. Three or four weeks later, it came back fixed. That was over two years and 3,500 rounds ago and the pistol has been fine ever since.

Would I have preferred never having had the problem? Of course. But did the company respond in a reasonable and prompt manner to make things right? Yes they did.
 
S&W semiautos and revolvers have been having more problems than other manufacturers. Yes, other manufacturers aren't perfect, and they might have some problematic firearms slip through that they later fix via warranty, but S&W has been having on going quality control and reliability issues seemingly at much higher rate. Of course they don't have to take things seriously because as you see in this very thread, many gun owners will rationalize and justify their failures as not existing because their example was okay, being over exaggerated, or being normal. It's not any of the latter. What it is at this point is inexcusable.

I've had two Shields so far out of the box with major failures as have many others. There are a plethora of issues that many have been having. Don't even get me started on Smith revolvers because it's agreed upon conventional wisdom that you're VERY likely to get one NIB with QC issues, thus you must handpick them out and inspect them thoroughly. Even S&W revolver fanatics will either refuse to own modern S&Ws, or they'll buy the newer stuff but will even concede that S&W has a bad QC problem.

Those who think this is normal and are making excuses need to raise their standards, and they are a part of the problem as they're enablers.
 
S&W semiautos and revolvers have been having more problems than other manufacturers. Yes, other manufacturers aren't perfect, and they might have some problematic firearms slip through that they later fix via warranty, but S&W has been having on going quality control and reliability issues seemingly at much higher rate.

Where did you find the data? That would be interesting to look at. Thanks.
 
I’ve noticed a trend over the past decade or so on internet gun forums. On forums dedicated to a particular name brand of firearm, at least half the postings are doing nothing but trashing that particular brand. People seem to adore complaining.
 
Back
Top