The only firearm I have owned that was about as complicated as my Model 97 was a Sauer-Colt Model 3000 Deluxe drilling 12/12/30-06. I got rid of the drilling after my first and only attempt at serious maintenance. The darn thing was a Rube Goldberg mass of tiny parts.
I have always believed that winter war around and in Stalingrad, and Marines' invasions of Japanese held islands during World War II, are (for infantry weapons) the two most challenging sets of conditions in the history of warfare with repeating firearms. While I am aware of Marines' frontline use of Model 97 "trench guns", I've wondered whether they were reliable in continual use during an Island campaign — that is, after days, perhaps weeks, of poor maintenance did those Marines who had been issued 97 trench guns do their utmost to get an M1 Garand or sub-machinegun? Did 97 trench guns remain regular limited issue to frontline "island hopping" Marines infantry throughout the war? Or were they relegated to use guarding supply depots and POWs?
I have always believed that winter war around and in Stalingrad, and Marines' invasions of Japanese held islands during World War II, are (for infantry weapons) the two most challenging sets of conditions in the history of warfare with repeating firearms. While I am aware of Marines' frontline use of Model 97 "trench guns", I've wondered whether they were reliable in continual use during an Island campaign — that is, after days, perhaps weeks, of poor maintenance did those Marines who had been issued 97 trench guns do their utmost to get an M1 Garand or sub-machinegun? Did 97 trench guns remain regular limited issue to frontline "island hopping" Marines infantry throughout the war? Or were they relegated to use guarding supply depots and POWs?