My letter from the White House

Joined
Jul 23, 2005
Messages
33,446
Reaction score
60,493
Location
NC
USEOPWH_img_president_small.jpg


Dear Michael:​

Thank you for taking the time to write. I have heard from many Americans regarding firearms policy and gun violence in our Nation, and I appreciate your perspective. From Aurora to Newtown to the streets of Chicago, we have seen the devastating effects gun violence has on our American family. I join countless others in grieving for all those whose lives have been taken too soon by gun violence.

Like the majority of Americans, I believe the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. In this country, we have a strong tradition of gun ownership that has been handed down from generation to generation. Hunting and sport shooting are part of our national heritage. Yet, even as we acknowledge that almost all gun owners in America are responsible, when we look at the devastation caused by gun violence—whether in high-profile tragedies or the daily heartbreak that plagues our cities—we must ask ourselves whether we are doing enough.

While reducing gun violence is a complicated challenge, protecting our children from harm should not be a divisive one. Most gun owners agree that we can respect the Second Amendment while keeping an irresponsible, law-breaking few from inflicting harm on a massive scale. Most also agree that if we took commonsense steps to curtail gun violence, there would be fewer atrocities like the one that occurred in Newtown. We will not be able to stop every violent act, but if there is even one thing we can do to reduce gun violence—if even one life can be saved—then we have an obligation to try.

That is why I asked Vice President Joe Biden to identify concrete steps we can take to keep our children safe, help prevent mass shootings, and reduce the broader epidemic of gun violence in this country. He met with over 200 groups representing a broad cross-section of Americans and heard their best ideas. I have put forward a specific set of proposals based off of his efforts, and in the days ahead, I intend to use whatever weight this office holds to make them a reality.

My plan gives law enforcement, schools, mental health professionals, and the public health community some of the tools they need to help reduce gun violence. These tools include strengthening the background check system, helping schools hire more resource officers and counselors and develop emergency preparedness plans, and ensuring mental health professionals know their options for reporting threats of violence. And I directed the Centers for Disease Control to study the best ways to reduce gun violence—because it is critical that we understand the science behind this public health crisis.

As important as these steps are, they are not a substitute for action from Congress. To make a real and lasting difference, members of Congress must also act. As part of my comprehensive plan, I have called on them to pass some specific proposals right away. First, it is time to require a universal background check for anyone trying to buy a gun. Second, Congress should renew the 10-round limit on magazines and reinstate and strengthen the assault weapons ban. We should get tougher on those who buy guns with the purpose of selling them to criminals, and we should impose serious punishments on anyone who helps them do this.

These are reasonable, commonsense measures that have the support of the majority of the American people. But change will not come unless the American people demand it from their lawmakers. Now is the time to do the right thing for our children, our communities, and the country we love. We owe the victims of heartbreaking national tragedies and the countless unheralded tragedies each year nothing less than our best effort—to seek consensus in order to save lives and ensure a brighter future for our children.

Thank you, again, for writing. I encourage you to visit www.WhiteHouse.gov/NowIsTheTime to learn more about my Administration's approach.


Sincerely,​

Barack Obama​
 
Register to hide this ad
yeah I got the same version of the "form" letter. I am sure they have several variations of the same letter, depending on how fervent you are to protect your 2nd ammendment rights.

Boy I am glad I am closer to retiring than just starting out in this world. wow, sad.

Chuck
 
I got mine a couple weeks ago.
I gave it the same treatment that I'm sure mine to them got - couldn't stomach to read it through, then >>DELETE<<.

What did it say? :rolleyes:
 
DB, I have been signing on-line petitions. Adding personal observations and input. I'm guessing they have chips implanted somewhere.:D;):D
 
I got the same crapola a couple weeks back. I always thought I would be honored and revere a letter from the office of the President of the United States of America and the White House. I was wrong.

I wonder if a copy of it ended up in my FBI and Secret Service files too.
 
I got the exact same email. I could actually feel the care & concern he has for the American people and especially gun owners(insert sarcasm icon here).
I guessing they got my email address from the several online petitions I signed.
 
I received the same letter. My question is why do they think the second amendment is there for hunting?
 
Both the S&W and Ruger "Link To Contact Your Elected Officials"
included the President in the list, so unless you unchecked him, your letter went to your Reps and Senators at your state and federal level along with the President, your Governor, Lt. Gov, and state Attorney General.

Go look at the list-
http://smith-wessonforum.com/2nd-am...-your-legislators-smith-wesson-made-easy.html S&W

http://smith-wessonforum.com/lounge/289406-link-contact-your-elected-officials-please-do.html Ruger

Thanks for the links Lee, we're all in this together.
 
There is no doubt that they have us on a list somewhere as a rebel gun owner. I considered that, but what choice do we have . If we do not make our voices known, we will be criminals as soon as he signs any gun ban into law!
 
I wrote "Uncle Joe" a stamped letter in the mail in mid-January, along with the Speaker of the House & all my reps...finally got a written reply (snail mail) in mid-March...it was a little toned down from that stuff above but not much...I think Biden's letter actually acknowledged self-defense -- unlike BO's...

one thing I can't figure out is, since when did gun ownership become synonymous with "gun violence"?
 
"Dear Michael..." That a letter written to represent the thinking of the President of The United States addresses the recipient using the familiar, informal, given name seems to me to set about the same tone as an elementary school principal writing to a sixth-grader. I suppose it is someone's idea of a good approach. :(
 
"We should get tougher on those who buy guns with the purpose of selling them to criminals, and we should impose serious punishments on anyone who helps them do this."

So how exactly does this impressive stance impact the Administration's scoundrels behind Fast and Furious?
 
I think the administration wants to turn in our guns and then Eric Holder can sell them in Mexico.

I notice our President wants to limit us to 10 round magazines, but he isn't suggesting that law enforcement be limited to 10 rounds is he? How about the military? How about the Secret Service?

Lets see, the anti gun folks don't want to pass legislation that might prevent someone with severe mental issues from getting a gun, but they don't want anyone to buy a gun with a flash hider, pistol grip, detachable magazine, or telescoping stock.

I see he uses the old if "even one life can be saved" argument. Yet in Chicago they average just under two murders a day and nothing the president proposes would have any impact on that. It seems if he wants to save just one life, he should start in Chicago. It seems like with something like 4-500 murders a year that would be rich pickings. Also, compared with the land mass of the USA, Chicago is a relatively small area and truth be known, the problem isn't all over Chicago, it is certain neighborhoods.

I am still upset over what the government did at Ruby Ridge.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top