Nine .25s or Eight .32s...

Which is better for CCW?

  • Nine (8+1) .25 ACPs

    Votes: 6 4.7%

  • Eight (7+1) .32 ACPs

    Votes: 123 95.3%
  • Total voters
    129
J

JayFramer

Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
4,593
Reaction score
9,327
Right now I have a Beretta Jetfire .25 ACP and it's a nice gun, reliable with low recoil. But the ballistics of .25 ACP, well... they're the ballistics of .25 ACP. But the gun holds 8+1 so it has that going for it.

Thinking about "upgrading" to a Kel-Tec P32 firing the .32 ACP round, but capacity would be reduced by one round, 7+1.

So I'd lose a round, but would the greater power of the .32 ACP make up for it? Also the KT would be just a small, a bit thinner, and actually a couple ounces lighter.

This would be for a pocket backup gun. Thoughts?

PS: I am NOT interested in a .380. My reasons are my own, please keep the discussion to the two mentioned choices. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
If you're going to choose between those two, then the .32.
But I wouldn't further handicap yourself by shooting it out of a Keltec.
Sorry, but I've actually seen them fall apart with magazines falling out, etc.
Spend a bit more and get something more reliable.
 
Jessie said:
If you're going to choose between those two, then the .32.
But I wouldn't further handicap yourself by shooting it out of a Keltec.
Sorry, but I've actually seen them fall apart with magazines falling out, etc.
Spend a bit more and get something more reliable.
Click to expand...


Maybe get a Beretta 32 like a Tomcat.

That said, sticking with your .25 would be a way of saving money. 9 rounds of .25 would likely get the job done.
 
Last edited:
The ballistics of the .25 ACP are worse than the ballistics of the .22 LR.

I'm a pretty flexible and tolerant gut but .32 ACP is as low as I'd recommend anyone going. However there are also two caveats to that:

First barrel length matters in the .32 ACP. It matters a lot. .32 ACP ballistics take a significant hit in short barrels, and the shorter it is they worse it gets. Far more so than the .380 ACP, which is already much more affected by short barrels than 9mm Luger.

Second, there is pretty much one load that will allow for both expansion and 12" penetration. That's the 60 gr Hornady XTP and it is readily available from Fiocchi at fairly reasonable prices around $25 per box of 50.

However, to get 12" penetration plus expansion it needs to be launched at around 1000 fps to 1050 fps. That requires a barrel that is at least 2.75" long and longer is better.

Unfortunately, many of the .32 ACP pistols out there are attempting to go for small size and in some cases to go for .25 ACP small size:

Seecamp LWS-32 2.0"
Beretta Tomcat 2.4"
Keltec P-32 2.7"

Then there are the more traditional designs using barrel lengths the .32 ACP needs to be effective, but in packages that are larger and heavier than most folks want for a pocket pistol:

Walther PPK 3.3"
Bersa Thunder 3.5"
Beretta 81 3.82"
Walther PP 3.9"

----

My personal favorite for a .32 ACP pistol is the Walther PP. It's accurate, reliable, and offers excellent terminal ballistics for a .32 ACP.

If you are on a budget, the Bersa Thunder in .32 is a good option in a PP sized package.

If you are looking for light weight and smaller size, I'll depart from some of the opinions people have stated above and suggest you could do worse than a Keltec P-32. It will launch a 60 gr XTP at around 975 fps where it will usually expand and penetrate about 11".
 
Are the two choices the Beretta vs the Kel-Tec or the .25 vs the .32?

In the former I'd take the Kel-Tec. Maybe two or three of them, they are cheap enough. If you have a problem with one you've got back-up.

If a gun genie granted me a wish for a .32, it would be the H&K P7K3.
 
I have owned or shot a dozen or so types of 32's I have owned one 25! Of the 32's I really liked an old Ruby a gunsmith gave me. I sand blasted it and Parkerized it in about 3 hours. I left it in the Park. solution about 3 times as long as it needed and the coating was thick enough that I needed to refit the barrel, slide and frame. While the Parkerizing was still soft I dry fired (wild lots of oil) and that got the trigger almost Colt smooth! The gun functioned with GECO and Remington Ball ammo, it also functioned just as well as with Winchester Silver Tipped Hollow Points!

For the life of me, I can't remember why I ever sold it? Must of had something to do with owning 3 other 32's and having 4 kids under 6!

Somewhere around 1999 or 2000, I had a Berretta Tomcat (Very early with a butter smooth trigger and deep blue highly polished finish) and an early Kel-Tec 32. I decided I only need one 32 (that is just not the right kind of thinking!) I took them to by back yard range and fires 50 rounds of Remington FMJ ammo through each. Both were jam free, always ejected and both groups were about 3" @ 20'. So I ran 25 STHP's through each. Again no FTF's or FTE's the Kel-Tec was at 3" again, the Berretta was at 1.5"! My best friend still carries that Kel-Tec as a BUG!

Ivan
 
In this case caliber doesn't matter to me as much as manufacturer.

I'll take a Beretta over anything Kel Tec any day.
 
I voted for the .33ACP.

The Kel-tec P32 has been around for 20 years and is generally considered their most reliable pistol. I bought one when it came out and another for my wife a few years later. Both reliable with all FMJ and HP I even cast WNFP. Super slim, super light. Shoots easy. Not blow-back so recoil is mild and operating the slide is easy. Even with the minimalist sights, no biggie to keep all shots on a human silhouette target at 25 yards, COM at 10-15 yards no drama, in the melon at 7 yards.

I love my Beretta 21A in .22LR but I would not buy that pistol in .32ACP, as there are too many reports of frame cracking in the .32ACP variant, even after they beefed it up.

Mass, Unloaded
KT P32 7oz
Beretta 21a .22LR 12oz
Beretta 3032 .32ACP 14.5oz
 
How well do you shoot either one? If one better then that's your answer,personally I don't buy into the "such cal is better for defense" since you are not looking for a fight then any caliber will do to defend yourself.

I've carried a .22 for a few days a Beretta 21 actually and felt fine,a good .25 would work same with a good .32.
 
JayFramer said:
Right now I have a Beretta Jetfire .25 ACP and it's a nice gun, reliable with low recoil. But the ballistics of .25 ACP, well... they're the ballistics of .25 ACP. But the gun holds 8+1 so it has that going for it.

Thinking about "upgrading" to a Kel-Tec P32 firing the .32 ACP round, but capacity would be reduced by one round, 7+1.

So I'd lose a round, but would the greater power of the .32 ACP make up for it? Also the KT would be just a small, a bit thinner, and actually a couple ounces lighter.

This would be for a pocket backup gun. Thoughts?

PS: I am NOT interested in a .380. My reasons are my own, please keep the discussion to the two mentioned choices. Thanks.
Click to expand...



I'd choose the .32. More power.


----------
 
I carry my LCP everywhere permitted. My only interest in a 32 originates from a Jim Croce song. The LCP is about as small a gun as they come for practical purposes. IMHO
 
I would choose a reliable .32 over a reliable .25 any day. Round count being off by one is of no concern to me. But, please add that shot placement is king, so one less round should not matter in the slightest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Its a Pocket Rocket Extravaganza!
2 3
Replies
43
Views
3K
Major 2
Major 2
TJm15.38
My Alternate Carry Gun; Kel-Tec P32
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
BC38
BC38
BB57
Beretta 80X
Replies
5
Views
3K
ISCS Yoda
ISCS Yoda
ddeanjohnson
For Sale WTS: 16 guns -- all offers respectfully considered -- collection liquidation
2
Replies
35
Views
22K
Heinz
Heinz
ddeanjohnson
  • Locked
WITHDRAWN -- Collection reduction: 40 guns (15 S&W + Colts, etc.)
2
Replies
26
Views
11K
ddeanjohnson
ddeanjohnson

Latest posts

Back
Top