Old Style Cylinder Release?

JayFramer

Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
4,596
Reaction score
9,335
Hey guys! Well I bought a Model 638-2 in like-new condition the other day. It was made in 1997 and comes without an internal lock which is why I bought it, but it comes with the "new style" modern cylinder release thumb latch. This is the triangular looking latch that comes on S&W revolvers nowadays.

I don't like it, and don't think it looks right on any pre-lock S&W handgun. So, I went over to Numrich gun parts and ordered a stainless "old style" J-frame cylinder release and I plan to install it on the gun. It will really look nice and classy especially with the wood magna grips I'm putting on it as well.

Anybody else ever change their new style cylinder release to the old style? Anybody see a problem with it? I'll keep the original release (the new style) for resale purposes, but like I said I much prefer the classic old style release.

Any thoughts?
 
Register to hide this ad
I don't like the "new" style thumb piece either, so I have replaced them with the older style, as to me, they look much nicer also. I rarely use speedloaders , which the new style thumb piece was designed for.

I've heard this isn't really so, that the old piece was just fine for loaders. Not to worry as I use Bianchi's Speed Strips for reloading my baby J's.
 
Might the new style have been designed to lessen cuts to the shooter's thumb in recoil?


How does that work out? I've never shot a gun with the new style.


Ruger gave some thought to the matter, and his cylinder releases don't cut thumbs with Magnum loads.​
 
I prefer the old style thumb piece, installed one on my 340 M&P. The new style always cut my thumb, the old style doesn't. I never noticed any difference in using speed loaders with either.
 
Is it considered "not kosher" to change this part out to the old style? Like I said if I ever sell it I'll put the "new" style one back one so it will be "correct" for it's model number (638-2).
 
Is it considered "not kosher" to change this part out to the old style? Like I said if I ever sell it I'll put the "new" style one back one so it will be "correct" for it's model number (638-2).

I wouldn't worry about it, if it works for you that's all that counts. Besides, there are a lot of people who wouldn't even notice. That being said, I would switch the thumb piece back if you sold it so that you would still have the old style thumb piece to put on your next revolver. I've been thinking of getting a spare 340, and I already have a old style thumb piece in the parts box waiting for it.
 
I have S&W revolvers with 3 different styles. Plus a couple of Colts that work backwards. None of them bother me. Stocks, on the other hand, well that's another story.
 
I wouldn't worry about it, if it works for you that's all that counts. Besides, there are a lot of people who wouldn't even notice. That being said, I would switch the thumb piece back if you sold it so that you would still have the old style thumb piece to put on your next revolver. I've been thinking of getting a spare 340, and I already have a old style thumb piece in the parts box waiting for it.

Nice. I've heard of several people changing out the cylinder release levers and was just checking to make sure it wasn't an affront to the S&W gods LOL!
 
Back
Top