Opinions requested on Colt M1911's

peterdeb

Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
666
Reaction score
696
Location
The FREE state of Florida
I am looking for opinions on the different Colt 1911's offered for sale. I am looking to add a nice blued (not RB) 1911 to my collection. Similar in looks to the WWII M1911 A1. I have seen MKIV series 70's, just series 70's all with different roll marks. Some with flat main spring housing and some with rounded housing. It will be more of a safe queen than a shooter.
Options and prices all over the place.
Appreciate your advice.
 
Register to hide this ad
Any Series 70 or Series 80 will have superior metallurgy to those from the WWII era and older. The pre-Series 70 pistols from the '50s and '60s are very popular with collectors so prices will likely be higher.

Mainspring housings are easily replaced and many will show that...no big deal. It just depends on which you prefer. At some point (late '80s I believe)...Coltstarted using a polymer mainspring housing and many have swapped theirs for steel. The polymer housing is perfectly suitable and time has proven it...just that some prefer steel.

If you want a shooter...you might take a look at a new one. The new Colts are as good or even better than ever. New manufacturing methods have made them more consistent, reliable and accurate than previous models...simply because of that consistency. They may not have the fine, Royal Blue finish of previous eras...but they'll come with better sights, will feed most anything you give it and shoot as good or better.

There's good clones out there as well...in all price ranges.
 
Both of my Colt 1911's were bought new, and recent manufacture. 5" Gold Cup Trophy, and a Commander, 4.25". Haven't fired the Commander yet. Have 5 1911's.
The Colts are very nice! My best shooter is a Sig. Bob
 

Attachments

  • P1060017.jpg
    P1060017.jpg
    101 KB · Views: 71
  • P1060019.jpg
    P1060019.jpg
    94.6 KB · Views: 65
  • P1060015.jpg
    P1060015.jpg
    87.9 KB · Views: 64
  • P1060013.jpg
    P1060013.jpg
    89 KB · Views: 62
  • 2-21-17 004.jpg
    2-21-17 004.jpg
    75 KB · Views: 64
Last edited:
1911's

You said Colts, but take a good look at the tisas, Turkish import 1911's. All forged steel, and they have a WW2 GI clone. Fit and finish is better than a new Colt Comp model. (My 2 cents worth). I have 2 9mm's and a 45. Can't go wrong with them.
 
I have a Colt GCNM Super Elite 36Super and a 1943 1911 A1 . Recently put a Colt 1911 Clark 6in Heavy Slide on lay-away . The Colts do get a hold of you , much like S&W's do . There's a bunch of great people on the Colt forum , more than happy to share their knowledge and answer questions .

Around Xmas , there was a lot of talk about Tisa's here . I ended up getting a 5in with a 9mm and 38Super barrel for a little over $400 . I haven't shot the 9mm , just can't see 9mm in a 1911 , but that's just me . It's got a great trigger and very accurate . It's not there with my Doug Koenig PC 1911-2 , but for the money you can't beat them . And the finish is really good also .
 
If you want a safe queen, blued Colt M1911-A1 that looks close to what a WW II Colt military issue 1911-A1 looked like, then you probably don't want a Series 70 Mark IV as the roll marking on the left side of the slide is a huge, gaudy billboard. For a really nicely finished 1911-A1, look for one made after WW II, but before the introduction of the Series 70 Mark IV. These look exactly like late WW II produced Colt's, but with a beautiful, deep blued finish. Expect to pay some big $$$$$$ for one too!
 
I have a Series 70 Colt with the spring collet bushing that I bought new back in 1974. I changed the arched mainspring housing for a flat one many years ago because I like the feel better in my small hand. The original housing was steel but the replacement I bought was aluminum. Now they're polymer, probably just as good. I get good accuracy with the collet bushing but some don't like them as they have been known to break but mine hasn't so I'm happy with it. If I was looking for a Colt today I'd buy a new one. Probably cheaper than a used one and better made.
.
 
Last edited:
Buy a Colt; get the original. Others in the same general price range may shoot as well or even better, but the Colt will hold value and be more desirable should you ever decide to sell or trade.

I would recommend a Tisas, especially if you want a USGI look alike. But I agree, it's funny how that little pony stamp makes an inferior gun seem to hold it's value more.
 
Last edited:
If you don't plan to shoot it, find one, any one, with a beautiful bluing job.

I have two Colt series 80's from the 1980's. Each of them required gunsmith work to operate correctly. Just based on examination of the parts in my Detective Specials, Colts prior to 1970 are the ones to own. It is apparent from my 1970's Detective Special that factory equipment was obsolete and wearing out. The internals to my DS look like they have been carved out from soap flakes. Real rough file marks, indistinct edges. I think extra large chunks of unfinished internal parts were being handed to assemblers, and they had to carve them to fit. Older Colts, if any parts required a file, it must have been a swipe, no more. Older parts look precise.

Incidentally, had one of those fingers break on a Colt collet bushing on a new Colt Combat Elite. Replaced the collet bushing on my SS 1911 with an Ed Brown drop in part. Worked great.

mKj3bsE.jpeg


The SS 1911, the series 80 firing pin block jammed up in the slide.

4PQk2XD.jpeg


this negated the function of the firing pin block. Not wanting to find new, novel failure mechanisms with a failed series 80 mechanism, I removed the series 80 parts and installed a spacer in the frame.

My Colt Combat Elite peened its frame out in 3000 rounds, all due to early unlock and bad timing. Colt replaced the frame but not the excessive recoil due to early unlock. Sent the 1911 off to Wilson Combat and paid more money for the work they did, then the original cost of the Combat Elite. Sad to say, Wilson Combat knew more about 1911's than Colt, and after the work they did, the Combat Elite is reliable and accurate. I always liked the two tone appearance and I had the blended Bomar, new front sight, the beavertail, a new hammer, and a match barrel installed. The timing is correct and the Combat Elite is no longer peening its frame out.

Kh44mJG.jpeg


A buddy of mine had a "Tactical Elite", a series 80 pistol equally as expensive as a Combat Elite, and made around the same time as mine. It has a factory created half ring in the barrel.

bfOAa8L.jpeg


See that shadow forward of the barrel hood? That is a factory dent right at one of the lug recesses. The cutting tool must have been pressed down too hard cutting the lug recess and left a partial ring. This is extremely bad and sloppy manufacturing in my opinion. And very bad that it passed Quality Control and was shipped.

I don't own any older 1911 Colts, nor later. Had my fill of them with just two 1911's. And my Clackamus Kimber Custom classic was far superior to any factory Colt 1911. Hard to understand what a big badda boom the Clackamus Kimber Custom Classic created on the market. It had everything you had to pay gunsmiths to do on a Colt, and it not only did not rattle like a Colt, it was as tight as gunsmith built NM 1911's.

However, the older Colts have great finishes, and if all you want is a pretty pistol, just go find one. Bring lots of money. Based on my Colt revolvers from the 1930's, the charcoal bluing back then is to kill for. The polishing is precise and the blue color from period charcoal bluing has a vastly superior blue appearance than any modern bluing. You have to see it to appreciate it. Expect to pay $$$$$$ for an excellent condition 1911 from that period.

Just don't shoot it, the value in vintage Colt 1911's is in the finish, not how they shoot.
 
Last edited:
If you want a brand new Colt that somewhat resembles a military 1911 you have two choices:

The Colt Classic has a short trigger and flat mainspring housing. The roll marks are like those found on Colt Gov’t Models in the 50’s and 60’s. It has a lowered but not flared ejection port, and the pre 80 series system (aka no firing pin safety). They retail around $800.

The other option, which Colt occasionally releases in small batches, is the MkIV/70 Series repro. These have the 1970’s to 1983 style roll marks. They have a short trigger and arched housing, the ejection port is not lowered, and there is no firing pin safety. Colt just released another batch this winter. These usually retail closer to $1,000.

I own both versions. Either one is a fine pistol. Should you only plan to shoot it occasionally, and you can find one, get the MkIV/70 Series. If you don’t mind buying used see if you can find an older one with a 71B or 72B serial prefix, they have a much nicer finish.If you like to reload your brass get the Classic, it will beat up the brass less with the lowered ejection port.

Over the last twenty years Colt has also made limited runs of GI repro’s. They made both 1911 and 1911A-1 versions. They’re not perfect copies, but the average person wouldn’t know the difference. The advantage over an original is you can shoot them as much as you want with no risk of breaking them.Figure on paying $800 up for one if you find one.

If you really want a GI spec 1911 you can also get a genuine GI surplus 1911/1911A1 from CMP. I think the prices range from $1,00 to $1,300 now.
 
I am a 1911 enthusiast but by no means an expert. But you asked for opinions.

I've been looking for a 70 Series Colt for awhile and ran across a mid 1970's Mark IV with a nickel finish that appears to have not been fired much. Wasn't looking for nickel but the price wasn't too bad so why not?

The Mark IV has required experimenting with recoil springs, extractor adjustment, and a new magazine to run fairly reliably with ball ammo. It still leaves a good dent in about 1/2 the brass and extracted brass falls in random locations. The trigger is mediocre compared to my DW, older Colt, or Nighthawk. But I have learned a lot tweaking it so that is worth something to me.

My opinion is if you want a Colt then your decision is which one looks best to you. If you want the best shooting gun for equal money you can do better elsewhere. I haven't decided whether or not to keep this Colt. The others are staying.
 
Last edited:
15-20 years ago Colt came out with a close copy of the WWI 1911 and WWII 1911A1 and both came in the blue collectors boxes. They are pricey now but I believe that is one that’ll continue to go up and make a great safe queen. The early WWI models were finished in the nice Carbonia bluing which looked great. I owned one of each but stupidly sold both not long after getting them.
 
In my somewhat limited experience, the older pre 1970s Colts are the best looking and best finished while the newer guns made in the last few years are probably the best shooters right out of the box. If you can, stay away from anything made in the mid 80's during the strike years. They were hit and miss on quality then. Something like a nice Government from the late 50's early 60's with box and papers is going to set you back enough cash to almost pay for a new Wilson or other brand of custom pistol.
I like to shoot my pistols so I don't own anything really nice or collectable. I stick to the newer stuff that is less costly and easy to come by.
With that said, I'm picking up a new Lightweight Commander in .45 in the morning and I'll let you know what I think of it.
 
Last edited:
These days just about everybody makes a 1911. But there's just something about a Colt. They're kinda special. :D
I believe the Colt 1911s were at their best during the 1950s-60s. They turned out some beautiful deep blued, high quality pistols at that time.
However, Colt had some serious management and strike problems during the 1980s and 90s. Quality fell off considerably. There were some good guns during that time, but there were also some real stinkers. Its a poop shoot on what you get. :rolleyes:
2000 - 2020 guns were good, but not what they had once been.
CZ bought Colt in 2021 and made some much needed changes. All reports I've heard are that the current guns are excellent.

Now if you want a real U.S.G.I. 1911, I suggest you look at the ones CMP is currently selling. These guns were U.S. issue and have been is storage for years. CMP has gone through them and repaired or replaced parts as needed and the prices is fair. ;)
 
Last edited:
16 responses, 16 different opinions, all of them perfectly valid. Handle as many different 1911’s as you can. If you have access to a range that rents 1911’s shoot as many of them as you can. Talk to friends who own 1911’s - maybe they’ll let you test drive theirs. You’ll like some better than others. Then buy what strikes your fancy and the best you can afford. Only you can decide what’s best for you.
 
I have a more 1911s than I need and not as many as I want. A few Colts that are of the "fairly readily" available -

Colt current manufacture 1918 model. There were a few different versions, this is the one with the more accurate rollmarks.
IMG_1273.jpg

IMG_1276.jpg

Gold Cup National Match reissue from about 5 years back
IMG_1103.jpg

A 1948 made plain old 1911 commercial type.
IMG_0305.jpg

Each is the "Series 70" type with no FP block. IIRC I paid about $1K or less for each.
 
Last edited:
I own quite a few Colt 1911's, mostly in 45acp but also in 38 Super and 22RF. Some are WW2 era, one is a Gold Cup National Match from the mid 1970's and one is a Series 80 from the early 1980's. I purchased the Series 80 for carry purposes when starting out and I had delusions of grandeur about carrying the full sized pistol on a daily basis. I wanted the extra firing pin block safety of the Series 80. Carrying the pistol lasted me under two weeks as it is extremely heavy, too large for CCW and way too bulky - at least for me. I still shoot the pistol a lot but never ever carry it anymore. The 45acp is one of the very best SD loads available however you pay the Piper in weight, size, bulk and lower magazine capacity of a 9mm.

IMHO Colt 1911's are all I'd buy! The are not as cheap as let's say a Tsisas or a Norinco but they are excellent quality, made in America and as accurate as any high end Ed Brown, Les Baher, or Wilson Combat 1911 I have ever shot. Where the high retail prices come in on those models is on their accouterments, fancy checkering, beautiful factory trigger, tight specs and of course the name on the slide for bragging rights. BTW, tweaking a trigger on a Colt 1911 is a piece of cake, easy and costs nothing as no parts need to be replaced. What I have come to find out is that my 1970's GCNM will shoot just as accurately as any high end 1911 at 1/3 the price. I have competed in many matches for decades with my 45acp GCNM and had no trouble outshooting many of the high end pistols. My GCNM will always outshoot the shooter! I have never lost a match because the pistol wasn't accurate or reliable - the onus is on me. Many of the other branded, high end 1911's I mentioned above are next to useless if you care to shoot reloaded ammo. Most need to be "loosened up" to reliably feed them They usually will not function reliably as their high end factory tolerances are just way too tight for reloaded ammo. They usually state in the directions that only virgin factory ammo should be used in their pistols. If you want to use your own reloads, stay away from the fancy high priced guns unless you are willing to open up the tolerances a bit which is counter intuitive to buying one in the first place! I shoot my 1911's way too much to shoot factory ammo!

Two of my Colt's have the finger bushing on the end of the barrel which Colt did use for a few years. Their intended purpose was to increase accuracy and they did accomplish at least that in part. The other reason was that fitting individual pistols with barrel bushings was eliminated since one size finger bushing pretty much fit any barrel. The downside to the finger bushings is that they can break from metal fatigue after thousands and thousands of factory rounds and over the years one of mine broke on my Series 80 after thousands of rounds of 230 grain factory ball ammo (before I reloaded). I simply slipped a new bushing on and was back in action! Colt eliminated the use of these finger bushings although they are still available on eBay, gun parts suppliers or at gun shows. I brought a few of them as a back up but have not had one break in 30+ years. Worse case scenario if one breaks, you can also easily just fit a standard fixed barrel bushing and go back to the original design - no big deal! BTW, my Colt GCNM is my all time most shot pistol having shot well over 150,000++ rounds through it! Still works, looks and functions perfectly and will still compete in any match.

Colts are SUPER accurate and super reliable!! They are the only ones I would use in a competition and I have won my share of matches. :) A Gold Cup National Match is 1/3 the price of a "high end" designer 1911's and for my purposes is actually better - I shoot my own reloaded ammo almost exclusively and never ever have any jams, misfeeds or hiccups with it.

If you are just wanting a range worthy, general purpose 1911, I suppose you could save money and buy a Tsisas which are usually rated decently by their owners but they are still not in the Colt class as far as I am concerned. And for what it is worth, Colt has been back on their game making guns for a while now! As you can see, Colt is my overwhelming choice in 1911's and other than one Remington Rand from the war, Colt's are all I own. I have recommended Colt 1911's to many friends and I am very confident they would but the same pistols all over again! None has ever had any issues at all.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5880.jpg
    IMG_5880.jpg
    47 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_0715.jpg
    IMG_0715.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 16
  • IMG_0716.jpg
    IMG_0716.jpg
    50.7 KB · Views: 16
Back
Top