Oral Arguments - VT Supreme Court, Magazine Ban

[dockmurgw]

Some of you might find this interesting, if you have 30 minutes to kill. The second of two challenges to VT's magazine ban are before the VT Supreme Court, here are the oral arguments from yesterday. What do you think of the arguments from our side, the first 15 minutes? I find some of it troubling, in that the attorney for gun owners seems to offer suggestions of compromise regulations. As an aside, I joke around about the threat of invasion by overly polite Canadians...it was actually mentioned here!

Click watch this video on Youtube after clicking the following link and it will bring you to the video.

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCWEXb-n40U&feature=emb_err_woyt[/ame]

 

[ladder13]

With friends like that....

 

[Protocall_Design]

With friends like that....

Who needs enemas?

 

[BigBill]

Maybe that's the problem they need enemas? Lol maybe all the anti's need enemas then there will be a shortgage of enemas? Lmas

 

[stansdds]

Sadly, the chipping away at the 2A, and all the other portions of the Bill of Rights, has become commonplace and seems to be accepted by the public. There are plenty of people, perhaps now a slim majority of people, who are perfectly willing to surrender their rights and liberties for the promise of security and safety.

 

[Miami_JBT]

Sadly, the chipping away at the 2A, and all the other portions of the Bill of Rights, has become commonplace and seems to be accepted by the public. There are plenty of people, perhaps now a slim majority of people, who are perfectly willing to surrender their rights and liberties for the promise of security and safety.

Rights became Privileges long before we were all born.

 

[reddog81]

So we don't need to ban standard capacity magazines because we should limit who can own those magazines based on age, mental capacity, location and also ban people from carrying multiple guns. Who hired this guy?

 

[Miami_JBT]

So we don't need to ban standard capacity magazines because we should limit who can own those magazines based on age, mental capacity, location and also ban people from carrying multiple guns. Who hired this guy?

Sounded like Marion Hammer from the NRA whenever she opened her big mouth here in Tallahassee.

 

[delcrossv]

Sadly, the chipping away at the 2A, and all the other portions of the Bill of Rights, has become commonplace and seems to be accepted by the public. There are plenty of people, perhaps now a slim majority of people, who are perfectly willing to surrender their rights and liberties for the promise of security and safety.

And we have a WINNAH!

How far we've come.

 

[stansdds]

So we don't need to ban standard capacity magazines because we should limit who can own those magazines based on age, mental capacity, location and also ban people from carrying multiple guns. Who hired this guy?

I guess every state and maybe every large city will need a department of pre-crime.

 

[cadmike]

I guess every state and maybe every large city will need a department of pre-crime.

1984
It's called the "thought police", and it's coming.

 

[stansdds]

1984
It's called the "thought police", and it's coming.

The only thing erroneous about the book 1984 is the title. Missed it by a few decades, but the content is proving to be quite true.

 

[ladder13]

1984
It's called the "thought police", and it's here.

Fixed..........

 

[white cloud]

The only thing erroneous about the book 1984 is the title. Missed it by a few decades, but the content is proving to be quite true.

You are nothing but right in making this point.