Plant ID please

Register to hide this ad
NOT wild lettuce. That is in the mint family and has square stims.
 
Difficult to determine from the photo but my vote is a type of prickly lettuce and yes prickly lettuce is a close relative of commercially grown lettuce. And it is edible but you want it considerably younger, and smaller, than this specimen.

Don't mean to be a butt-head but I actually have an earned PhD in weed science (NCSU 1986). You can get a PhD in just about anything! But in all candor, taxonomy through photos has never been a particular strength of mine. I am in error about things several times a day.

Bryan
 
I have a bunch growing around here. I thought they were from seeds mistakenly thrown by my fence by, uh, the neighbor kids, yeah, but they’re just useless weeds. I mean useless, I heard.
 
Just useless plants. They make oxygen. So that’s good.
 

Attachments

  • version=1&uuid=42BE24E5-C736-4F98-82B1-475277B9D3E7&mode=compatible&noloc=1.jpg
    version=1&uuid=42BE24E5-C736-4F98-82B1-475277B9D3E7&mode=compatible&noloc=1.jpg
    140.3 KB · Views: 58
Last edited:
The Real McCoy - sort of

Here's a pic of hemp in a Texas AgriLife (extension service) variety trial from last summer. We're trying to find a variety adapted to Texas conditions that yields decent fiber. It turns out it's a bit of a task. And no; I'm not that kind of weed scientist.

Several posts referred to "useless" plants and that is pretty close to the actual, working, definition of what constitutes a weed. It's all based on anthropomorphism (people-orientation).

A weed is a plant for which an economic use has yet to be identified, or a plant growing "out-of-place." Hence prickly lettuce is a non-economically important plant and therefore a weed. And so is a corn plant growing in a field planted to soybeans.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 100_1742.jpg
    100_1742.jpg
    182.5 KB · Views: 96
Back
Top