Peter M. Eick
Member
Since I can't travel to the convention next weekend (sorry Bill, work calls as I suspected), I have a question for you folks to consider and give me some thoughts on why.
The fundamental question is why did the Colt Super 38 outsell the 38/44's by a factor of 3 to 1 for the Heavy Duties and 2 to 1 for all of the 38/44's?
First off, consider the history. The Colt 38 Super 1911 came out in 1929 and sold about 37,000 units by 1941. The 38/44 Heavy Duty came out in 1930 and sold about 11,000 by 1941. Even if we add in the roughly 4700 38/44 Outdoorsman's, the Colt 38 Super in 1911 outsold my beloved 38/44's by two to one.
Why?
Ballistics of a 130 at 1300 (38 Super) vs. 150 at 1150 (38/44HS)?
More rounds and quicker reloads?
Perceived more reliable?
Easier to carry?
More accurate? (highly doubtful in my opinion)
Or something else?
Thoughts? Comments? Insights?
The fundamental question is why did the Colt Super 38 outsell the 38/44's by a factor of 3 to 1 for the Heavy Duties and 2 to 1 for all of the 38/44's?
First off, consider the history. The Colt 38 Super 1911 came out in 1929 and sold about 37,000 units by 1941. The 38/44 Heavy Duty came out in 1930 and sold about 11,000 by 1941. Even if we add in the roughly 4700 38/44 Outdoorsman's, the Colt 38 Super in 1911 outsold my beloved 38/44's by two to one.
Why?
Ballistics of a 130 at 1300 (38 Super) vs. 150 at 1150 (38/44HS)?
More rounds and quicker reloads?
Perceived more reliable?
Easier to carry?
More accurate? (highly doubtful in my opinion)
Or something else?
Thoughts? Comments? Insights?