Quick review....Ruger .327 Federal Blackhawk

gizamo

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
2,406
Reaction score
866
Location
Maine
First, I want to address the scepticism that has floated about the amazing Internet. Mostly by folks that have no experience with this new cartridge.

It is to noisy... Well folks, a .357 is louder. Do not hear folks whining about that cartridge.

There is no need for it... The 32-20 already exists.

First off, I bought a new 32-20 from USFA in the original Colt format. I ran it hard against hot rodded 32 H&R magnums and found it lacking. Eventuality selling the gun in favor of three different single six Rugers. Freedom Arms entered into thiis .327 niche. Have not seen one, never mind had a chance to test one. But boy, that would be the cats meow.

It is a defensive round, only.

Horse malarky!. This round is capable of great accuracy at over 100 yards in a handgun.. It will make a excellent varmint cartridge when finally chambered in a rifle.

Too expensive.

At 28 bucks a box of 50 for American Eagle... That argument is gone.


No manufacturer will commit to the cartridge and it will fade away like some wildcats.

Dead argument. To many example from Ruger, S&W, to Charter Arms. Perhaps the .32 H&R is now finally in jeopardy.

Anyrate, the critics are starting to disappear. A good thing. The cartridge is here to stay.

Here is the new Distributors Special from Ruger. A 8 shot .327 in SS with a 5.5" barrel. The initial break in tests on this gun are.very promising Make no mistake. It is heavy at almost 47 ounces. But heavy is one thing, perfectly balanced is another. The gun holds steady. Weight offset by balance. Weight, also reduces felt recoil. The impression is one of shooting a .22 mag.

My example is shooting just over one inch groups twenty five yards, factory ammo. Have the dies to reload for it already...still.waiting on a order for molds and lubrisize dies for it. Then, the real fun begins. Ruger Only Loads....

IMAG0117.jpg


IMAG0118.jpg
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
No target photos as yet on my gun. Jeff Quinn over on GunBlast has posted on some using YouTube. I ran my gun today at a NRA style steel plate shoot. Better shooter with a Kimber and a eight round mag. I stayed with him shot for shot on the dueling trees. Not bad for a SA....
 
I have shot it out of the Ruger SP101 and really like it. It's a screamer,
I want one in a lighter J frame . The current Comp one I do not care for. Hopefully they(SW) have started making new Pro series version.
 
Lipsey's is the last distributer I found.listed. I looked, called dealers, tried begging, and finally lucked into one.. List is $699.... Cabelas sold me mine for $590.
 
One of these would be nice in a S&W K-Frame w/ about a 3" heavy barrel and low profile sights. With a round-butt, it would be outstanding. Also would be very interested in one on a K-Frame w/ 4" lugged barrel.
 
Ruger .327 Federal BH

Good report [pun alert]. Wonder if there is a S&W Model 16-5 6" in the wings, awaiting takeoff? Or a new Model "683" L-frame 7 or 8-shooter? Might bring down the prices on the 16-4s.

Regards,

Dyson
 
Sir, it sounds like a good small game/pest cartridge with potential for silhouette shooting. Defense load, I'm not so sure about that. Interesting, though. I like the rifle idea.

Thanks, and Semper Fi.

Ron H.
 
gizamo,
Dandy article you've just penned. You've reawakened my interest
in the round. A .327 long gun would be pretty special, too.
I'd like to see a smaller framed model, too. We'll see...
Thanks for posting, TACC1.
 
Marlin produced a short run of .32 H&R magnum lever guns a few years back. Wonder if you couldn't chamber ream one the extra tenth of an inch?

For the cartridge to really take off, a rifle needs to become available. It's already been three years since the .327 came on the market.

I would love to see it in a single shot or bolt gun....:)
 
A T/C contender would be great in .327 in the handgun length or the rifle. I have a S&W 17 cyl waiting to be converted to .327 or 32 long and a 4" 32 mag bbl. Waiting for the current project to come home before this one gets started.Larry
 
Gentlemen, I think the 327 has merit but the gun companies can't quite get a handle on what type of gun it works best in. Ruger first came out with an almost defensive gun and not really a "field" gun. Then Smith brought out a J-Frame performance center gun that the distributors are now "blowing "out becase they do not sell worth a darn. Then Ruger came out with the full size Blackhawk mentioned above as well as the Gp100. The question that many of my shooting buddies ask is why carry a "heavy" field gun in 32 when you can just as easy carry a 357 or for that matter a 44? In my humble opinion, I think that the cartridge would be best served in a 6 shot 2in. J-frame or ruger snub, a 4 or 6 inch K-frame, and either the Ruger Super Single Six or perhaps the Ruger current smaller flattop anniversary frame blackhawk,perhaps with an extra cylinder in 32-20. As an aside, the Marlin 94 in 32 H&R is easily rechambered to 327 and makes a great field rifle in short carbine form. Hamilton Bowen also re chambers 16-3's and can make the modifications to the various Ruger's. I think that in the right gun the cartridge has a good deal of merit and quite frankly I enjoy fiddling with it , I just wish the manufacturors would use guns that are better fitted to the cartridge.
 
Last edited:
I am bringing this thread forward. I am a FAN of all things .32, I recently purchased a MARLIN COWBOY 1894 in .32 magnum and sent it off to be converted to .327 federal. I will keep you updated on the process.
Now, getting to revolvers, S&W is absoluting goofing up by not offering a K or L frame in this caliber. I own a bunch of single sixes but the conversion cost is crazy. With the Rugers, the redhawk, blackhawk, or GP100 is to large to carry. As said before, with those sizes and weights you might as well have a .357 or larger.
 
Not trying to knock the cartridge. I'm just curious.

This is a 327. Case length 1.2", OAL 1.47", 115 grain JHP @ 1300fps from a 3 1/16" barrel for 431 foot pounds of energy.

This is a 30 Carbine. Case length 1.29", OAL 1.65", 110 grain @ 1990 fps from an 18" barrel for 967 foot pounds of energy.

I realize that you can't really compare ballistics from a 3" barrel with an 18" barrel, but still, except for the rim, that looks like the same cartridge. So, why all the whoop-di-whoop about the "new 327"?
 
I loved my Single Six in 32 H&R, but I felt the new 327 BH to be too cumbersome. I would love to see an FA gun.
 
in a blackhawk in 30 carbine you can get about 1500 fps with a fast load. noise is unreal with that speed though. the blackhawk also has a 71/2 inch bbl. don't understand why they aren't putting longer bbls. on the 327 mag. i would think one of the 10 inchers would be fun.
 
I just had a 4" bbl Charter Arms Target Patriot shipped in yesterday. I should get it to the range this weekend with 32 H&R and 32 Long loads. I have not seen Fed ammo for it available in SW MT. It will make an ideal packing around, coyote calling, trap line and small game gun.
 
Back
Top