Reliability Test for Semi-Auto's ???

Status
Not open for further replies.

gold40

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
98
Reaction score
1
Location
St. Louis, MO USA
If one purchases a brand new semi-auto handgun for self defense purposes, how many fired rounds constitute a "reasonable/normal reliabilty test" for the new weapon? Is there a mathematical answer?

I would expect to fire 50 rounds for "Break-In" and perhaps incur a few failures due to newness. Then, after a thorough cleaning, I would propose to fire another 100 rounds as a reliability test. If there were no failures (FTF or FTE), should I then feel confident as to reliability?

What do law enforcement agencies do? Do they have published standards? Do they test each new handgun they acquire?

Your comments welcomed...
 
Register to hide this ad
If one purchases a brand new semi-auto handgun for self defense purposes, how many fired rounds constitute a "reasonable/normal reliabilty test" for the new weapon? Is there a mathematical answer?

I would expect to fire 50 rounds for "Break-In" and perhaps incur a few failures due to newness. Then, after a thorough cleaning, I would propose to fire another 100 rounds as a reliability test. If there were no failures (FTF or FTE), should I then feel confident as to reliability?

What do law enforcement agencies do? Do they have published standards? Do they test each new handgun they acquire?

Your comments welcomed...
 
IIRC, Wilson Combat recommends 500 rounds before even the first strip and cleaning, and Doc Roberts likewise advocates 500 with the carry/duty ammo (buy a case, use half, load/store the rest). I'd be really uncomfortable with less than 200 ball, 200 duty, and 0 failures. My duty 1911 has 4 failures with ammo not recommended for it (+P, when it was specifically set up for standard pressure 230 grain), and 1 failure with crap (Blazer) in 2000 or so rounds. No failures with appropriate ammo; that's a few types of ball, I think some SWCs, and 3 or 4 types of JHP (mostly our duty stuff, 230 grain gold dot).
 
I usually break in my guns in with 500-750 rds. of ammo. The first 500 are assorted varieties consisting of loads I intend to carry. The last 250 consist of the winner of those loads which gave total reliability and which I intend to carry.
 
I think it took a couple of hundred rounds before the retaining pin fell out of my first KelTec .32. I sent the gun back and KelTec replaced it.
 
Thanks for the responses.

I hadn't previously planned on shooting another $150 to $200 of ammo just to validate the gun's reliabiity, but I guess that is the norm.

I suppose I can benefit from the "extra practice."

As a follow-on question, how would you feel if you had one or two FTF or FTE after shooting 400 rounds? Do you start over, or what? Or just accept a 1/300 chance of failure?
 
I would find out why there was a FTF or FTE. Sometimes it's the ammo. Sometimes it's the way you didn't hold the gun properly. Sometimes you have to learn how to quickly clear and reload the next round.
 
Thinking more about this topic....

What is an acceptable "failure rate" (FTF or FTE) for a well-made, reliable, broken-in, semi-auto handgun shooting its preferred ammo. What should we expect? 1-in-100? 1-in-1,000? NONE?

I'm wondering what is reasonable, as few products are perfect.

On the other hand, being a civilian CCW, the odds are probably 1000-to-1 that I will ever have to fire it at another person in self defense. Nevertheless, if that unfortunate day does arrive, I would like to think my gun will work.
 
Originally posted by gold40:
What is an acceptable "failure rate" (FTF or FTE) for a well-made, reliable, broken-in, semi-auto handgun shooting its preferred ammo. What should we expect? 1-in-100? 1-in-1,000? NONE?

Same as a well-made, reliable revolver - depends on the application and on what YOU want. I don't accept failures that haven't been explained and apparently prevented for the future. I once sold a revolver because it had broken a firing pin twice. Couldn't figure out why, and didn't know anyone who could.

I have several autos that have never bobbled a round. I don't have any revolvers that don't work all the time. I usually carry a backup. I don't carry a spare pair of spectacles on my person, but I have shot an IPSC match w/o my spectacles, and my eyes are better now than they were then.

YOU have the info on YOUR guns. YOUR choice. Just remember that if your autos don't work, there are plenty of perfectly good used revolvers out there.
 
What I have done and how I see it. After break in if you can pick up the pistol and fire a complete mag time and again you have your reliability. The talk of 200, 500, or 1,000 rounds before a failure to me is crazy. How many times will you need 200, 500, 1,000 rounds in a self defence situation. If it makes you feel better a box of 50 rounds without a failure every time you are at the range is proof that your pistol is reliable. Just my .02 worth.
 
Honestly, the most critical test I've seen of reliability is to shoot it in practice until you aren't having problems, and then come shoot a few IDPA matches with it.

Even though IDPA stress is simulated, it will cause shooters to make the mistakes they would in a shooting and induce failures in their guns.

Limp wrist, fumbled reloads, can't hit under stress, and sometimes the gun is actually faulty, but the shooter has been "excusing" it mentally when shooting alone. I've also seen guns shoot OK "after they get warmed up" which is no good for a defense gun.
 
Originally posted by gold40:
Thanks for the responses.

I hadn't previously planned on shooting another $150 to $200 of ammo just to validate the gun's reliabiity, but I guess that is the norm.

I suppose I can benefit from the "extra practice."

As a follow-on question, how would you feel if you had one or two FTF or FTE after shooting 400 rounds? Do you start over, or what? Or just accept a 1/300 chance of failure?

I'm not real sure where you buy your ammo, but I don't think any of the rest of us want to shop in the same place.

200 rounds or so is a good minimum for breakin. This works for both the weapon and you. You must know the weapon. You can use generic ball ammo for this, you don't need duty type ammo for this purpose.

How much duty ammo you run through it depends upon your wallet thickness and the profile of the ammo in question. There are many bullets that have a nose profile (ogive) nearly identical to ball. There are those who argue for 200 rounds of duty ammo on top of the breakin rounds to verify reliability. If the profile is sufficiently close to ball, I figure one box may be good enough. Your money, your choice.

As to failures, it kinda depends upon the probable cause. Most feed failures are magazine related. The ball ammo should allow you to figure out what you have to do to make the weapon perform reliably. Repeated failures indicate you should try different ammo, then let someone else shoot the weapon to see if it's mechanical or you're contributing to the issue. A quality, properly lubricated semi-auto running quality ball ammo should be near 100% reliable.

The IDPA or other match is a good idea. Just don't regard it as training.
 
200-250 rd of the ammunition that you'll actually be using, plus at least 50rds or three complete loadings - whichever is greater - through each magazine that you plan to use. Cut corners as you choose.
 
After a fluff and buff, I put two hundred ball reloads through my P3AT, after which I cleaned it thoroughly. Then I ran fifty Speer Gold Dots through the gun, relubricating it after every couple of magazines or so. Whenever I have run carry ammo through the gun it is when the gun is clean. Since it passed the carry ammo test I've run several dozen Gold Dots through the gun, even limpwristing it and had no problems. When I take it shooting, after four magazines or so of range ammo that gun will get stoppages, but it never will when clean and lubed, or dirty and kept relubed. Part of the process can be learning the animal you're dealing with and how to make it tick. Since I keep my K-T meticulously clean and lubricated I know it will get me through the seven rounds I keep in it. After that it doesn't matter. I New York reload.
icon_wink.gif
Larger autos tend not to be so finicky.

Getting an auto running is a lot of horse crap. That's one more reason I like revolvers.
 
My personal standard is a minimum of 500 rounds "without any failure" that can't be directly traced to the ammo being used. It seems to have worked well for me. Not real cheap but then I like ME the "Best" of all the guys I have to stare at in the morning mirror!!!
 
For me, 500 rounds of ball ammo and at least 50 rounds of your carry load of choice. If possible 100 roudns of you carry load wouldn't be a bad idea.
 
Once again it comes down to what are you using the gun for. FBI required the 1911 contract gun to fire 5000 rounds - no failures. Springfield won the contract. The list goes on. Most of us can not afford to shoot so many rounds, but if I have even one failure at the range; I have to figure out why. 500 rounds is my absolute minimum in a semi-auto. I carry a L-frame 357, so I don't have to think about failures.
 
I carry a L-frame 357, so I don't have to think about failures.

Sir, revolvers can and do fail. I've had it happen several times with Smith and Colt sixguns, as well as lesser makes. If you're not thinking about revolver failures, you might want to start.

Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.

Ron H.
 
Ron H. is most definitely correct. I had a Diamondback break a firing pin twice. I had a near-new 547 pierce a primer and the firing pin wouldn't come back. It took a lengthened decapping tool to fix that enough just to open the cylinder.

Revolver malfunctions may be MUCH rarer than those of bottomfeeders, but they do occur.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top