Just because you don't know what you're talking about doesn't mean I'm as clueless.
There's a difference between a dimple and a slam fire. If you understood how the bolt rotates on an AR15, you would know that it is very unlikely for a slam fire to happen. Zillions of non-magnum primers are used in reloads for AR's with nary a problem. The only real problem is pierced primers with hot loads as that will erode the firing pin.
Like I said earlier, there are a lot of myths about primers in ARs.
Well you sure put me in my place
That is why I specifically referenced info from the primer manufacturers. I figure they know more than I do. Unlike you I don't know it all, and I have no problem admitting it.
Forgive me for taking your inquiry about slam-fires as a serious question. I see now it was just a troll for an opportunity to start an argument so you could show us all how much smarter than everyone else you really are. Including the folks like CCI who manufacture primers and ammo. My bad, not a mistake I'll make again.
If a
factory loaded round with the proper thick-cupped primer exhibits a "dimple", it stands to reason that a primer with a thinner cup will show an even deeper dimple. Deep enough to fire? Maybe, maybe not. Most people don't want to find out the hard way. That whole "safety" thing.
The fact that you say it is "very unlikely" rather than "impossible" is a tacit admission that
it can happen. It is very unlikely that I will ever have to defend myself with a firearm, but I carry one every day anyway. I have fire extinguishers and a spare tire too - even though it is "very unlikely" that I will need them.
If the primer manufacturers caution against using regular primers for AR rounds, I am just ignorant enough to believe them and follow that recommendation. Just like following the other recommendations in all the other published reloading data I use.
I guess I'm kinda stoopid that way
