Rental car review: 2021 Nissan Sentra SV

LVSteve

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
22,473
Reaction score
34,011
Location
Lost Wages, NV
Thanks to COVID I've not done one these for a while. So...

Model: 2021 Nissan Sentra SV, 4-door, FWD sedan
Engine: 2.0 liter 4-cylinder, 149 hp, 146 lb ft.
Transmission: CVT
Weight: ~3100 lbs (like most cars far too much, IMHO)

Performance

Well, 149 hp against all that weight means you will never go drag racing. That said the step off and acceleration around town is perfectly adequate. The CVT doesn't let the motor moo too much unless you are in the habit of matting it at every light and stop sign, but I don't consider that driving. The CVT is even set up to provide stepped gear changes under heavy throttle.

The motor is mostly quiet except when you get on it some or the cruise control gets frisky. More on that later. 70 mph on the freeway has the motor running at about 1850 rpm. Mind you, this trip involved much less altitude and fewer grades than my Nevada trips. Performance will certainly be blunted in Denver. Three cheers for no auto start/stop system. I guess they don't work with CVT transmissions.

Ride and Handling

Large caveat here. ALL FOUR TIRES WERE OVER INFLATED BY 10 PSI. Bloody criminal on the part of the rental company IMHO, and I told them so when i returned the car. This assumes the TPMS system reads about right. I didn't find the TPMS menu until the last but one day of my trip, and I decided not to mess with the pressures without one of my hand gauges.

Ride on the freeway was punctuated at every minor seam by the over inflated tires. Still, I'm sure the 16" wheels give it a better ride and acceleration than the upscale model tested by C&D that rode on 18" rubber. 2020 Nissan Sentra Sedan Joins the Family Odd thing is that larger bumps gave the impression of a well tuned suspension with plenty of travel.

Handling is also hard to judge. Steering was light, feel-less but accurate. Roll is well controlled. Straightline stability could have been better, possibly compromised by the overinflated tires.

I never had to hammer the brakes so I can't comment on their ultimate performance. I would say that pedal pressure, feel and response were such that I didn't really notice the brakes, and that's how it should be.

Interior

Sorry, forgot to take pictures. Yes, there is hard plastic in many places, but it all seemed to be well screwed together. There were no squeaks or rattles and all the panels lined up. Seats feel a little narrow compared with a comparable Corolla, but they proved very comfortable. I could arrange a good driving position, which isn't always the case with my long legs and T-Rex arms. Headroom was fine, probably because this car wasn't cursed with a sunroof. I forgot to climb in the back behind my driver's seat position, but by eye there plenty of room. "Small" cars aren't small anymore, at least by the standards with which I was raised.

Interior is very quiet (NVH has come a long way in most cars) and I was impressed at the lack of road noise despite the tire issue. The radio worked well and synced up with my phone immediately. Apple Carplay was 100% for navigation.

Like many cars, the steering wheel is packed with controls. I felt that some were too close together. When operating the cruise control I hit the voice command, phone answer and cruise disable buttons quite a few times, and I have slim hands and fingers.

HVAC worked well and wasn't overly noisy even when the fan needed to really push. To my surprise the HVAC is a dual zone system, split left and right. One thing I didn't like was the rear and over the shoulder visibility. It's better than some modern cars, but it's a continual beef I have. The center high mounted brake light aslo blocks the view.

Highs

Adequate performance and space for $20k. Quiet, and mostly good on gas. I saw 34 mpg with a lot of city driving.

Lows

That darned cruise control. It is an adaptive system with no means to disable the radar system to make it a regular cruise. That's a no sale item for me. Also, the cruise was hyperactive in resuming speed, using way more revs and acceleration than necessary. Looks like Nissan are overcompensating for the glacial resume function on older models, like my old Xterra. Rear visibility.

attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 2021Sentra01s.jpg
    2021Sentra01s.jpg
    284 KB · Views: 188
  • 2021Sentra02s.jpg
    2021Sentra02s.jpg
    248.9 KB · Views: 189
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Steve, re power to weight ratio, you drive any Mazdas? I've read they focus on trying to keep their cars light for that reason.
 
Steve, re power to weight ratio, you drive any Mazdas? I've read they focus on trying to keep their cars light for that reason.

I've never had a Mazda as a rental, so no joy on that front. From what I read in the motoring media, Mazda's quest for lightness often results in inferior NVH compared to other vehicles in the same class. To be honest, and maybe showing my age, I'll take a heavier car with blunted performance and better NVH for long journeys over a lighter car. Recall theses comments when I got stuck with a Versa about seven years ago.

Then there is the lack of directional stability. Yes, I checked and the tyre pressures were perfect, a first on a rental I think. First of all, the narrow tyres track the ruts left in the highway by the trucks. Worse, it has little or no resistance to crosswinds. With the slightly roly-poly ride you feel like you are driving a badly loaded tramp steamer in a hurricane. It takes way too much concentration to keep in your lane under certain wind conditions. My travel buddy told the customer it was a bit like riding in a washing machine due to the combination of noise and motion.
 
I rented a Nissan Altima a couple years ago in Denver which is the next size up from the Sentra and it was very comfortable with 4 of us in it and it got absolutely amazing gas mileage. It had a pretty decent power at altitude and I was quite impressed with the car. I also rented a Hyundai Elantra which is direct competition to the Sentra, in Georgia a year ago and we drove it to Florida. I was very impressed with how smooth and quiet that little car was and it looked good inside and out and had an overall feeling comfort and quality.
 
CVT transmissions have always been a sale breaker for me. Modern tarnsmissions with lots of gears have a very smooth shift pattern these days unless you are horsing it. Plus, anecdotal and hearsay evidence from people I have talked to does not give me a good feeling about the reliablility of CVT's.
 
I suspect that a lot of the weight comes from the efforts to address crash protection. I could be wrong.

I have had a couple of Nissan rentals over the years and and as result would not buy one.
 
CVT transmissions have always been a sale breaker for me. Modern tarnsmissions with lots of gears have a very smooth shift pattern these days unless you are horsing it. Plus, anecdotal and hearsay evidence from people I have talked to does not give me a good feeling about the reliablility of CVT's.

I bought a 2013 Nissan Altima coupe in 2014 with the 4 cyl and CVT transmission.

I loved it in great multitudes for the CVT trans. Every car I've drove from Florida to Cincinnati on I-75 thru north GA, Tenn, and KY you couldn't use the cruise control in the mountains. The trans would be shifting back and forth like crazy going up and down the hills. I've made the trip in a lot of different cars and trucks, and experienced the same in all of them.

While driving my Nissan the only way I could tell there was any shifting going on was by looking at the tach.

Little car had plenty of power too. I sold it when I bought my Tacoma, because I'm single and one of them was sitting most of the time. I miss it now thou.

I don't use the cruise control on my Tacoma even in flat Florida. The slightest grade and the thing will start shifting funky.

KFP_8781_1-L.jpg


KFP_8785_1-L.jpg
 
CVT transmissions have always been a sale breaker for me. Modern tarnsmissions with lots of gears have a very smooth shift pattern these days unless you are horsing it. Plus, anecdotal and hearsay evidence from people I have talked to does not give me a good feeling about the reliablility of CVT's.

The programming of CVTs has advanced greatly in recent years to reduce the complaints about the "rubber band" sensation. It's true that 10-12 years ago Nissan went through a bad patch with their CVTs. I would hope that's been engineered out by now. I must say I noticed no issues with a 95k mile loaner from Carmax.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top