Review new Shield 2.0 357 Sig.

Fatboy01

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
28
Reaction score
25
Location
Oro Valley AZ
Just purchased a new Shield 2.0 in 40 S&W and bought a Remsport .357 Sig threaded barrel to go with it. I wanted a single stack in .357 Sig and other options (Sig Sauer and H&K) did not appeal to me for various reasons.

I ran 60 rds of 165gr G-D's (40S&W) and 75 rds of Remington 125gr Golden Saber and 25 rds of Fed 125gr HST's (.357 Sig). Everything functioned fine right out of the box.

I've got a lot of experience with both calibers (Glock G33 with both factory barrels). My initial impression was the Shield was easier to shoot well than the G33 (that I have shot a lot). As always, the 40 twist more on recoil than the 357. Follow-up shots have always been easier for me with Sig round regardless of the firearm. Same holds true for the Shield. I'll do a side-by-side, Shield vs. G33 when it cools off a little Tucson.

When my 357 "range ammo" shows up from SG I'll put a lot more rds through the Shield just to make sure it runs well before I EDC it (current EDC is G43).

Random thoughts: I like the trigger (but it is light - OK), I like the
sights - easy to pick-up, the Shield points well, the grip texture was OK but I put some ranger bands on it to bulk the grip a bit. I'm very happy with my purchase. For someone who would like single stack in 357 Sig this is a viable option. Last thing; I got the threaded barrel for a slight gain in length (velocity).
 

Attachments

  • Smith 1.JPG
    Smith 1.JPG
    244.7 KB · Views: 172
  • Smith 2.JPG
    Smith 2.JPG
    273.2 KB · Views: 135
  • Barrel 1.jpg
    Barrel 1.jpg
    82 KB · Views: 143
Register to hide this ad
I've been thinking of converting a Shield 40 to 357sig. Thanks for the review.
 
For my education, why would someone make that conversion?
 
Any idea of what the velocity was out of the 3.1" barrel? I would take the 357 Sig over the 9mm any day.
I am anxiously awaiting someone to make a conversion barrel for the new 2.0 Compacts. I already purchased a new 40 compact 2.0 in anticipation of a 357 barrel becoming available......
 
Any idea of what the velocity was out of the 3.1" barrel? I would take the 357 Sig over the 9mm any day.
I am anxiously awaiting someone to make a conversion barrel for the new 2.0 Compacts. I already purchased a new 40 compact 2.0 in anticipation of a 357 barrel becoming available......
The M&P Compact has been offered from the factory chambered in 357SIG

MP%20357c%201s.jpg

Why not just buy the Factory barrel for it?
 
The M&P Compact has been offered from the factory chambered in 357SIG

MP%20357c%201s.jpg

Why not just buy the Factory barrel for it?


He's looking for a 2.0 Compact in .357Sig. Different barrel/animal than a 1.0 Compact.
 
Fatboy - Good review and good info - 'specially with pitchers. I only have a coupla .357 Sig's but I like the round. I also really like handguns that are capable of firing more than one round. I have the dies but haven't ever tackled loading it, I may have to give it a whirl ...
 
I know that the full size barrels are interchangeable between original and 2.0.

Are you sure that the compact barrels are not?

I never bothered to look at a compact since I have owned one for years


Well, the 1.0 Compact barrel is 3.5", shorter than either the 3.6" 2.0 Compact or the 4.0" 2.0 Compact. There's that to start.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top