The S& W stamp does not look smudged to me. Looks pretty detailed to the eye..There is some slight cylinder drag, but othe than that, looks in beautiful condition, and the bore is excellent to say the least... As far as the grips, I am no expert, but I have seen and been told that S&W's grips varied and not always one style throughout the years, even with the same model...but again, you gents would know more about that than I...that's why I posted the gun to begin with here..
Thanks to all for your help in this..but I am wondering: since the finish is SO nice on this, does that mean guns of this period, aside of the grip issue, can't have a finish this nice??? must it always be suspect that this condition would indicate the possibilty of a refinish?? I recently bought another 1905 with a finish almost identical in condition that was this clean and lustrous...
I am not attempting to argue even a little bit... but I am absolutely seeking knowledge here on this part I've quoted.One other item. The shape of he extractor rod knob is typical of guns made from the late 1920s into the post-WWII period. In summary, what you have is likely to be a .38 M&P (NOT a 1905) from the early 1930s with period-incorrect grips and possibly refinished.
Stunning and gorgeous!This one from 1923 looks like it just left the factory. Probably spent most of the last 100 years in someone's drawer. . .in its original box.
I am not attempting to argue even a little bit... but I am absolutely seeking knowledge here on this part I've quoted.
What is the distinction between a .38 M&P and a 1905 as you've said?
The only S&W that I have ever lettered is the serial number 357xxx that was my Grandfather's, he gave it to me when I graduated high school. It dates to 1921 and in the letter I got from Roy Jinks in 1999, he calls it specifically:
"Your revolver is classified as the .38 Hand Ejector, Military & Police Model of 1905 Fourth Change."
What's the difference between a .38 M&P and a 1905, and when did this change occur?
. . . I cannot answer exactly why the historical letters continue to call those post-1915 revolvers as Models of 1905. Perhaps somebody reading this knows the reason . . .