S&W fights back

The “Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act” hasn’t protected gun manufacturers from being sued. The lawyers just changed their tactics.

They are now suing based on marketing or advertising. It has worked, we just lost Remington because they could no longer afford to defend themselves in these lawsuits. I assume that is why they want old Smith & Wesson advertising info.

Even if companies can stay in business we will carry the burden of these baseless lawsuits in increased gun prices.

Remington's demise was the result of far more than any lawsuit.
 
Since it has become popular to redefine the 1st Amendment in opposition to it’s intent by our Constitution and Bill of Rights, would it not make sense they would become emboldened and strike at our treasured 2nd? By merely introducing H.R.127, have they not made it clear their intent to usurp the 2nd Amendment and since the 2nd ensures our right, it also makes it clear (reference - The Federalist Papers : No. 46) it is incumbent that citizens are required to stand up against a tyranny. Calling H.R.127 an act of a tyrant would seem to be an understatement.
 
Since it has become popular to redefine the 1st Amendment in opposition to it’s intent by our Constitution and Bill of Rights, would it not make sense they would become emboldened and strike at our treasured 2nd? By merely introducing H.R.127, have they not made it clear their intent to usurp the 2nd Amendment and since the 2nd ensures our right, it also makes it clear (reference - The Federalist Papers : No. 46) it is incumbent that citizens are required to stand up against a tyranny. Calling H.R.127 an act of a tyrant would seem to be an understatement.

I agree 100%.
 
Do think America will fall like the other European countries and even Australia and accept a assault weapons or semi auto gun ban? What will you do when they say to turn them in or buy them back?
Taking down Remington Arms was there goal in the end. I think this sent a warning to all the other gun manufacturers. Fact faulty trigger or not we never point a loaded gun at anything we don’t want to shoot. Plus never trust any guns safety. Case closed.
 
Last edited:
Do think America will fall like the other European countries and even Australia and accept a assault weapons or semi auto gun ban? What will you do when they say to turn them in or buy them back?

A few years back I would have quickly said NO! to that question. BUT. After witnessing "things" over the last year or so...now I'm not so sure. I'm rapidly losing my faith in the American people as a whole...to do the right thing. As for part 2 of the question, I don't have the types of firearms they would say "turn em in"...as I am a nerdy revolver and lever gun fanatic...but if I did own them I wouldn't turn them in. I'd encourage others to not comply...as we all know that once you lose a freedom, a Right or a privilege...you never get it back. I plan on spending the rest of my life with the same amounts of rights I was born with.
 
Last edited:
SCOTUS will be of no help on this, just look at the decisions from the PA. elections.

Sad but true. The SCOTUS was always a source of comfort for me when facing intense pressure from the anti-gunners. Now, I have much diminished faith that they'd do the right thing and side with the 2A and The Constitution. More than likely, they'll just refuse to hear any gun related cases that get tossed their way.
 
Pro gun insurance companies should get in on insuring against frivolous lawsuits. Sell a hatchet. Someone gets killed with the hatchet. Do they act all crazy about that? Take a kid shooting. Take a kid fishing.
 
Who are the pro-gun insurance companies????

And if there are any, how long do you think they will remain pro-gun when the government threatens to put them out of business?
 
Back
Top