Sam Colt or John Browning?

JohnHL

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2013
Messages
3,672
Reaction score
5,896
Location
Foothills of the Ozarks
Whose hands do YOU have?

Arguably the two most iconic American handguns, the Single Action Army and the model 1911.

The SAA has always felt awkward in my hands.

With a low grip, my pinky curls underneath.

With a high grip, my thumb crowds the hammer.

Either way, my trigger finger bends at a contorted angle.

OTOH, the 1911 fits perfectly in my hand.

All fingers securely grasp the grip and my index finger falls naturally on the trigger.

I know there are grips available to make anyone's hand fit any gun.

But I am talking here about the standard SAA grip and the original 1911 grip. (NOT the Army redesigned "A1".)

So let's hear your opinions.

Do you share Sam Colt's manual dimensions?

Or are your paws more like John Browning's?

John?
 
Register to hide this ad
I'm not sure that the 1911 is the best gun for me, but it is very good. The SAA suffers from the difficulties which you describe, but it does recoil in an acceptable fashion.

BTW, the 1911 fits my hand well for target shooting, forced into my right hand by my left hand, but draw from a holster works best with a 1911A1. The front of the grip should be stippled or checkered, and the grip safety works fine with no additions.

Other folks will quite properly report differently.
 
I prefer a 1911A1 frame and 1911 flat mainspring housing. I had several Colt Walker clones and those grip frames fit me fine, but the SAA frame is to effeminate for my hands.

Bill Ruger comes in ahead of Sam Colt's number of designs, and I prefer his Standard and Bisley grip frames' fit to my hand.

Ivan
 
This M1911A1 has been my "go to" pistol since 1961. It's a WWII Ithica that I had accurized when I was in the Army, and further customized when I was in the Army National Guard after active duty.

When I pick it up (or any other 1911) it's like shaking hands with an old friend. I carried it on active duty and afterwards in the Guard.

Although I have several single action revolvers s and shoot them easily, none can compare with this 1911A1 for a natural grip or ease of use and firepower.

John


(Click for larger image)
 
Last edited:
My opinions are derived from extensively shooting a pair of 1911s for over 30 years, and handling perhaps half a dozen max SAAs over the same 30 years.

Guess which way I'm voting??

I'm sure if I tried, through custom stocks or some such thing I could feel the same way about the SAA. Just never really traveled that road.
 
Last edited:
Man, I don't know what you are talking about. My old SAA fits my hand quite nicely (perfected at colt in 1920):

attachment.php


But then again, so does my old 1911 (from 1915):

attachment.php



In all seriousness however.

The plowhandle grip is excellent for it's original intended purpose. The rolling action helps the shooter when shooting a hand cannon from horseback with your off hand because your main hand is filled with a sword.

Some people like the rolling action so much they would even grind off (as a writer in American Rifleman touting this set of modifications) the "much cussed hump":

attachment.php


Personally, I love shooting an SAA with my pinky wrapped underneath the grip. If find it provides a great deal of stability, and while it initially feels odd, after a bit of practice it became my preferred way of shooting anything with a plow handle (unless its flinging .44 mag down range).

The 1911 is a wonderful size in my hands, and I quite enjoy shooting a good 1911. The single stack is also nice because it means you can still play around with the stocks you put on it to better fit your hand if you like.

But really, there's no comparison between the two. It's apples to oranges and the correct answer, as always, with fine old guns is; Own and enjoy both.
 

Attachments

  • lb4imXSh.jpg
    lb4imXSh.jpg
    78 KB · Views: 303
  • tslbiI3h.jpg
    tslbiI3h.jpg
    111.6 KB · Views: 301
  • 6R7acOh.jpg
    6R7acOh.jpg
    115.1 KB · Views: 302
Neither one ever worked that well for me.
I’ve shot way more Ruger Single Actions than I have Colts.
So if I go with JMB design that fits my hand the best, it’s the HiPower.
 
I'm not too crazy about the feel of a SAA Colt but its almost a 40 year older design than the 1911 and it was introduced when repeating handguns were in the infant stage. Compared to the competition in 1873, it did quite well at the time and still doing pretty good 150 years later.
 
Combat Commander, with the arched housing. But “best fits my hand” overall would go to the 1934 Beretta.

“Col. Colt made all men equal, but John Browning gave them two more rounds.”
 
Last edited:
While I’m not inexperienced with the SAA…the 1911 platform fits my hand like it was born part of my arm and hand.

While Sam Colt was a smart man he was first a promoter. John Browning was a true mechanical design genius.
 
My first centerfire handgun was a .45 Colt Old Model Ruger. My second was a Essex frame .45 1911 with the long trigger & flat mainspring housing.

I've also owned a Colt New Frontier and a USFA .44 Special single action.

I like 'em all.
 
No question the 1911 fits my hand better than the cowboy revolvers. It fits my hand better than most other guns, but the Browning high-power and the Smith & Wesson M&P 10 mm are tied for number one with the Smith & Wesson having the better trigger and more ergonomical thumb safety.
 
John Browning was an absolute genius, a visionary who was so far ahead of his time that well over a century later, firearms are still using modified versions of his designs, and despite all the attempts to make handguns more ergonomic, the original 1911 is still widely considered to be one of the most comfortable feeling guns in the hand to this very day.

'Nuff said.

attachment.php
 
Last edited:
sorry Colt fans... Mr Browning for the win... for me at least.
Much prefer a 1911 grip to a SAA... but to be honest... Browning Hipower for the win
 
Back
Top