Shield 9mm to 45acp, did you or would you?

awmp

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
172
Reaction score
66
Thinking about a Shield 45 again.

I have had the Shield in 9mm for years and love it.

I like 45acp but not sure its worth getting a 45acp shield.

Thoughts?

Did you or would you switch to 45acp?

Pics? Holsters? How you carry?
 
Register to hide this ad
I've never had any cravings for .45, but if I ever did get the itch, I'd definitely find a way to try one first.
Then... If I did get one in .45, I would add it to the group, rather than trade my Shield9 for it.
 
I have the 9 and don't plan to switch to 45. Nothing against 45 but I'd prefer the extra capacity of the 9 and I don't think that the 45 offers the advantages in terminal ballistics that some ascribe to, particularly in short barreled pistols.

Even though I'm fine with the function of my 9 Shield, ultratec00 makes some good points specifically about the 45 Shield that seem worth considering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kwh
I have a M&P 9c and a 45c. I shoot the 9c very well and really had no "need" for the 45. Just wanted one. I shoot the 45 quite well also. Can't say I have a preference in which I carry; I know I'm well armed with either. If you can afford it , get a 45; If you have to sell or trade the 9, you probably should shoot a 45 first to see if its is all you think it is.
 
Go 9mm

With many law enforcement agencies positively re-thinking the 9mm, including the FBI, my thought is that in a short-barreled handgun, the 9mm would have an advantage, simply because a larger, heavier bullet needs more barrel to really get going.
 
With many law enforcement agencies positively re-thinking the 9mm, including the FBI, my thought is that in a short-barreled handgun, the 9mm would have an advantage, simply because a larger, heavier bullet needs more barrel to really get going.

Groo here
' The 9 mm lives on FPS , needed to open the HP.
The shorter the barrel, the harder it gets to get the magic 1000 fps needed.
The 45 , being larger, need not expand at all.
Also the larger bore looses less FPS by % than the smaller one.
This is why ,on my short barrel guns, I tend to use Flat point
or fpfmj bullets and I don't expect them to open.......
 
Groo here
' The 9 mm lives on FPS , needed to open the HP.
The shorter the barrel, the harder it gets to get the magic 1000 fps needed.
The 45 , being larger, need not expand at all.
Also the larger bore looses less FPS by % than the smaller one.
This is why ,on my short barrel guns, I tend to use Flat point
or fpfmj bullets and I don't expect them to open.......

Having one tenth of an inch more diameter than a 9mm unexpanded is no advantage. Having an extra round is.

I'm not aware of any 9mm defensive bullets that will not expand from a compact pistol barrel. Even if they only expand partially, say to 50 caliber, they will usually exceed the damage done by an unexpanded .45.
 
shield 45

have mine about 3 months love it! been carrying 45 since 68 and this is my new carry piece. Have about 700 rds thru mine all reloads lead and ball kind of finicky with lswc have to experiment with COL.
 
My brother has a 9mm that I have shot on a number of occasions. It is stock mechanically. Do not like the trigger pull, mushy feel. Grip feels small and slippery to me. It gives me a funky recoil impulse, like I could feel the slide moving back and forth in slow-motion. Now I know that the .45 is just marginally larger but it fits my hand better. Like a g36 compared to a g19. Like the new grip texture too. The rental gun's trigger was much cleaner and crisper than his 9mm's. It also grouped better than my RO compact I had with me that day. I liked it enough that I am waiting on a no safety model to transfer in and go pick it up.
 
shot one, loved it, recoil is very manageable, the grip is fantastic, 45acp is dead on. awesome little pistol.



This ^^ :)

I started with a FS 9 (still love it), tried 45 on a dare from friend who's been shooting 45 for 30+ years and fell in love with the round.

Picked up a Shield 45 and 45c and haven't looked back. My M&P 9 FS is still a great range gun and I would trust it in carry, but I carry the other two now and think they're fantastic.

For me, recoil feels more controllable in my hands with a push instead of a snap (more linear slide motion and lower slide velocity), plus it has a good grip and amazing accuracy for its size, and the round is like a little freight train even at the velocities that you get from the shorter barrel. Choo choo! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: CB3
I have no problem with either caliber with appropriate ammo. I have owned a 9MM Shield and carried every day since 2013. Until the ammo changed in a good way, I had no use for the caliber. When the .45 Shield was announced, my curiosity was piqued. I found no fault with the 9, but had a hard time vizualizing how the .45 could be a really good thing in the Shield platform. Never thought they couldn't do it, but after getting one to satisfy my curiosity, I became an immediate believer. I've always liked the .45ACP regardless of the projectile, but with premium ammo, it's even better.

But my needs centered around an EDC gun that was easy to carry, easy to shoot and use, was reliable to my standards (very high!), and accurate for the purpose. The platform had to fit my hands and allow me to shoot it as easily and as well as I am capable of at this time in my life. I had already determined that the 9MM would meet those standards with a reasonable amount of ammo and could be reloaded more easily and spare loads could be carried more easily than my beloved revolvers with which I had over 40 years experience. The platform also operates (draw and shoot with nothing to fumble with just like the revolvers I am so programmed to shoot.

With all this, I bought a .45 Shield. Didn't need it, but my curiosity needed massaging. It was. I was absolutely positively astounded by it. I don't say it's better than the 9, at least not for it's purpose, but it is absolutely as good. And for me, there was nothing not to like about the .45 if I could stand to shoot it in the Shield platform. I could ... in fact, I loved it! The trigger was better than my 9, the recoil was not noticeably more than the 9, shot recovery time was plenty good for predator control, and accuracy was as good or better than the 9. In fact, I shoot it a bit better than the 9. And ammo capacity? I'm used to 6 (or 5) rounds before reloading, remember? Depended on it most of my adult life! And I carry extra ammo too!

So now, I'm carrying the .45 every day, all day. But I still would not hesitate to go out and about with the 9. But it's kinda my back up EDC now. If you now own a 9MM Shield and get along with it just fine, I see no need for you to spend any more money for anything but ammo for practice. If you are curious like me, or if you just like the .45 like me, and you can afford to scratch your itch, I can give you no reason not to proceed to scratch. Not many things feel much better than scratching an itch! I predict if you are itching, scratching will bring a great big ole smile to your face! But remember, 9MM ammo is cheaper than .45, you do get an extra round or so with the 9, and you only have to stock one caliber. Me, I already had a pretty good selection of .45ACP as well as the 9MM, so I wasn't adding a new caliber to my ammo shopping list.

My wife has a 9MM Shield. We have a FS M&P 9MM with 17 +1 rounds ready to go at the head of our bed. That same gun goes on trips with us as a car gun. But I'm now carrying the .45, so we carry both calibers in loaded mags for backup ammo in the car bag. A bit more "trouble", I guess, but I am very happily carrying the Shield .45 while keeping my 9MM on standby and ready to go. So my advice is to keep your 9 and scratch your itch. If that is satisfying, then you've got two great personal protection guns. Somebody said, "Two is one, one is none." A spare ready to go is never a bad idea if you can afford it. The truth is, neither one of these fine Shields cost much in the overall scheme of things.

Sorry for the long winded post. Hope you find something here to help you make up your mind. But in the end, you are the only one who can make up your mind for yourself. Different things work for each of us. The challenge is to find out what's best for you. If you can't get good hits with it, it ain't for you!!
 
Had Shield in 9mm. Liked it just fine. Carried it for about two years every day. Nice pistol for EDC.

I tried a Shield .45 and liked that one even mo bedda. I spend each morning riding my mosickle alone out in the southwestern deserts. I like the .45 more for several obvious reasons and that one that has been left unmentioned which is that the .45 is a GREAT shotshell load for snakes and putting various small game in one's belly if having to walk out of the desert. Not a NEED usually, but a nice feature compared with the somewhat puny 9mm shotshells which have functioned well many times for me in the past.

I just like the .45 better. Sold the 9mm . Folks can discuss various ballistics stuff all day, but in general a big heavy bullet at slightly lower velocity from a short barrel will impart more lethal energy into one's target in a defensive engagement while limiting long range unintended penetration. Besides, the 45 just feels " right " when ya shoot it....

Why do I choose the .45 ?? CUZ THEY DON'T MAKE A .46 .....


YMMV
 
I have the shield 9mm 40 and 45. The 45 is prob my fav EDC gun, Its more accurate than either the 9 or 40 (just slightly more). Its only slightly larger, in fact the 45 fits in my Shield 9 Leather holsters as they do strech a little.
Lucky Gunnner did some pretty extensive ballistics test on a lot of defensive ammo in 380,9mm,40 and 45acp all out of short barrel guns. The 45 had some very impressive results out of the Khar barrel, Real good penetration, better expansion espically with a +P round. The winchester SXT 230 +P the Federal HST 230 grain +P and speer (same weight) seemed to do the best. The Hornandy 220 +P Critical duty had some great penetration but less than average expansion
1SG
Out
 
Last edited:
Back
Top