Slow & Heavy Or Fast & Light?

Erich, Bro., I know what straw man is.

strawman.jpg


My argument is based on paradox, not sophism. Either way, thanks for a good response.

And BTW, if you worked on even one coroner case -- it was one more than I've ever seen (or want to see).

icon_smile.gif
 
It is refreshing to see such civil, paradoxical, and deeply philosophical sophistry to get ready to go to work by. Thanks guys!

Maybe I did over-rate the shot placement thing. A deer slug would be optimimal to ensure rapid and virtually complete termination of hostile performance on the part of an agressor, so I guess slow and heavy wins.
 
Originally posted by thomashoward:
Elmer Keith said the best load would be the camp stove traveling at 1000 FPS.
That would make it heavy and fast

Sir, are we talking Coleman-type white gas stove, or old-school sheet iron? The famous (in some circles) Pepsi can stove hadn't been invented yet when Mr. Keith was writing, but that would probably be the ultimate in "fast and light."
icon_biggrin.gif


Regarding the original poster's question, see my sig line.

Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.

Ron H.
 
Originally posted by S/W - Lifer:

"I do not trust any expanding handgun bullet to actually expand on a human target."

Many shooters don't. They didn't used to expand reliably until you got into magnum loadings from 6 inch barrels, and then only sometimes. We used to figure that 1,000 fps was the bare minimum to see expansion of handgun bullets in people.

I don't believe that anymore.

In December, 2001, I was involved in a shooting with a couple of bank robbers leaving the branch with a teller for a hostage. I fired four rounds of Federal's 230 grain .45 ACP-Plus-P "Tactical Bonded" loading (their catalog number LE45TI) from a Colt Commander with a 4-1/4 inch barrel.

Two rounds penetrated fully, one a front-to-back torso shot that hit no bones, the other a shot very high in one thigh that missed the femoral artery. I spotted both those bullets laying on the ground before they hauled me away. I also got to examine them closely in person later. They could have come from an ammo maker's magazine advertisement, classically mushroomed to well over .75", and held onto pretty well all of their original weight.

A third shot hit the side of a skull, just above and behind the ear, caused a depressed skull fracture and then DEFLECTED (!!!!!) down into his shoulder, where it penetrated several inches and was removed by a trauma surgeon. The hollowpoint's opening was stuffed with several layers of clothing material. The bullet expanded just like the other two above.

Shot number four angled down through the torso, from under the arm, through a lung, and ended up down in the fellow's lower abdomen. It is still there. The X-rays make it appear that it expanded fully, as well. It travelled about 18-22 inches after entering the skin.

Those bullets expanded and performed very well, from a cartridge that isn't considered to be a high-pressure/high velocity round, fired from a shorter-than-standard length barrel.

My department issues the bonded Federal in 9mm, .40 S&W and .45 ACP. We used to issue it in 10mm Auto before discontinuing the carry of guns so chambered.

I worked my department's robbery-homicide unit from 1998-2003. We are my state's oldest and largest law enforcement agency, although only medium-sized by "big city" standards. I was the unit's "gun guy" and got to weigh and measure a lot of bullets during that time. I then supervised our crime lab for a few years and got to weigh, measure and photograph a lot of other bullets.

The Federals we issue seem to work well, performing as designed. One officer-involved shooting involved two deputies putting four 9mm and three 10mm rounds into a large, cocaine- and alcohol-fueled fellow with a couple of large knives. All were recovered either from the deceased or the wall behind him. All expanded classically and retained about all of their original weight. All were torso shots; about half, I recall, exitted. The 9mm was, I believe, the 129 grainer Plus-P while the 10 was the 180 grain "FBI Lite" load.

Handgun bullet expansion is generally a good thing, as most FMJ loadings from .38 Spl. on up will usually exit the torso. Some expansion limits this but doesn't eliminate it. It also punches a bigger hole and, because it makes the frontal area of the bullet larger, more likely to rupture a major aorta or sumsuch vital part, leading to more rapid ceasation of hostilities.

Hangun bullet development has come a very long ways in the past 25 years. It is more effective. But, keep in mind, compared to most rifles and shotguns, handguns are still pretty weak sisters when it comes to stopping the action.

I would also like to extend a friendly invitation to any of our forums members, who plan on being gunshot or otherwise seriously injuured traumatically any time soon, to plase come to any part of the unincorporated Salt Lake (UT) County or any of the fine cities we contract with, to be shot. The emergency medical services provided by the former Salt Lake County Fire Department (now named the Unified Fire Authority) is superb. Our highly trained, state-of-the-art paramedics and firemen will do the utmost possible to keep the blood inside and you breathing, convey you to one of several fine state-of-the-art trauma centers in a timely fashion, to give you the greatest possible odds of surviving.

The shooting of mine related above occurred on about 9:00 a.m. of a Friday morning, about 150 yards from a fire stationed manned by these great folks. Both of the shootees survived their wounds (!!!!), albeit at taxpayer expense, due to the efforts of both the fire folks and the hospital surgical staffs.

We in the unit, having witnessed the medical care provided by other, lessor fire departments in the valley, then made a pact that, if any of us were shot or otherwise damaged in another, non U.F.A.-grid municipality, that our buddies would throw us in a car and transport us to an area U.F.A. serves, and call them from there!
 
I've cast and used many tens of thousands of semi wadcutter bullets in various handgun rounds over the years and so one would have to bend the truth by a country mile to say that I dislike cast bullets of the SWC persuasion.

Having said that,I believe that the semi wadcutter solid is only marginally better than other bullet nose profiles.It acts as a solid because it is a solid.I have not seen any evidence that it damages more tissue than another nose profile.The theory (starting with Elmer Keith)was that it CUTS a hole in paper and so it must do the same in flesh.It was a good theory until high speed photo observation dispelled it.

Ross Seyfreid even admitted it and Keith was his mentor.High speed photo observation showed that the shock wave that spreads around the penetrating bullet spreads the flesh beyond the bullet itself.The sharp shoulder of the SWC doesn't even make contact with the flesh.So much for assumptive reasoning.


For 7 years,I had an occupation that had me deliver dead bodies to the medical examiners office on many occasions.I have witnessed many post mortem exams and the only thing I feel sure enough to relate is that the "solid"bullet wound paths look very much the same when fired from a handgun.(regardless of caliber or bullet shape).

I've used jacketed soft and hollow points more than solids in the hunting field because I and many others observed much greater tissue destruction.I'm sure that someone will point out some exceptions but it's my belief that the majority of expanding bullet failures occur when driven at mediocre velocities.When a well designed hollow point is driven with enough steam to do it's job,the outcome is normally more desirable.
 
About 100 years ago Thompson and LaGarde did extensive testing on handgun cartridges, from .30 Luger to .476. They concluded that bigger is better. I may not carry a .476, but I do carry a .44 Special. If I carried a autoloader as my primary handgun, it would be my .45 Auto Government Model. I'm willing to bet my life that either one will get the job done.
 
Originally posted by jag312: About 100 years ago...
I hate to break this News to you but Many, Many things have changed in the last 100 Years and while their "Testing" was excellent for the time it isn't particularly relevant to today because many of the things that can be done with Heavy AND Fast bullets simply could NOT be done when they did there Study.
 
I have read the Thompson LaGarde tests(not just excerpts).Livestock were shot in a Chicago stockyard and dead cadavers were shot(apparently to see how much the body would move when hit).The conclusions were "non conclusions".They had a very VAGUE impression and if you read the reports,(you will see just how vague the impression was)that the larger bullets SEEMED to hit a bit harder.Livestock was shot repeatedly with various calibers and they noted how long it took before the animal would finally fall.On several tests,the smaller calibers won in the comparison.

For anyone to even suggest that there was something conclusive about the Thompson LaGarde tests is pretty comical.After reading the reports,my impression was that they were trying to avoid the embarrasment of not reaching a conclusion at all.

I do not have an axe to grind and I don't have a horse in this race.I am pointing out that a lot of what are considered TRUISMS in the gun world are actually little more than myths.

I can remember when Jeff Cooper was writing that 45 hardball dropped a man 95% of the time when hit ANYWHERE in the torso.That's 19 times out of twenty.REALLY???...He got away with saying it for a long time until he discovered that some people were keeping records.

I actually agree with these men on many things.I consider the 38 special to be abysmal.So,yes,I agree with Keith,Cooper,etc on a number of things but NOT when their ideas prove to be fallacies when under scrutiny.
 
It's occured to me since my post that someone may get the idea that I'm trying to preach about what to carry and use for protection.Such is not the case at all.

Carry and use what you want.If someone makes it necessary for you to shoot them,most of the ballistic minutiae will drop down the pole of priorities pretty quick.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top