Testing 38spl p+ loads (2400 & power pistol)

Forrest r

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
1,910
Location
Ohio
Both these loads were on the mild side for the bullets being used, 11.0gr of 2400 and 6.2gr of power pistol. The lighter bullets (145gr/150gr) could of used 11.5gr of 2400 and 6.6gr of power pistol. But Both the 11.0gr & 6.2gr loads were easy to control with all the bullets tested.

2400

h&g #51 146gr swchp 867fps
Cramer #25 (hunter) 158gr rnfphp 879fps
Cramer #26 150gr swchp 868fps
358439 156gr swchp 879fps
358156 148gr gc swchp 888fps
Mihec 640 158gr rnfphp 891fps
Mihec 148gr hbwc loaded backwards/crimped in top lube groove 850fps
150gr jacketed hp made from 380acp cases 916fps
358431 145gr hbswchp 882fps
Raphine 145gr hbrnfphp 902fps

2400 had a 882fps average for the 100-shot 10 different bullet string.

Power pistol

h&g #51 146gr swchp 878fps
Cramer #25 (hunter) 158gr rnfphp 895fps
Cramer #26 150gr swchp 905fps
358439 156gr swchp 873fps
358156 148gr gc swchp 900fps
Mihec 640 158gr rnfphp 889fps
Mihec 148gr hbwc loaded backwards/crimped in top lube groove 884fps
150gr jacketed hp made from 380acp cases 910fps
358431 145gr hbswchp 859fps
Raphine 145gr hbrnfphp 880fps

The 100-shot 10 different bullet string for power pistol was 887fps.

Of the 5 powders used in the testing, bullseye and unique were on the heavy/max side compared to the other 3 powders tested. None of the loads I tested were excessive, the cases fell out of the cylinders (no sticky extraction). And most importantly, none of them had excessive recoil. Any of them could easily have follow-up shots. I shot tested all 500 rounds in 1 day and the last 200 shots tested were the 2400 and then the power pistol. While 500 rounds in 1 day with a snub nosed revolver and p+ loads isn't ideal, it was not excessive to me by any means.

Most of these loads can be tweaked for more performance.
My 2" bbl'd snubnose 38spl does run a little on the slow side compared to other 1 7/8"/2" bbl'd revolvers
The test results for a 100-shot string with 10 different bullets were:

bullseye 801fps
unique 833fps
be-86 845fps
2400 882fps
power pistol 887fps

Of the 10 bullets tested the lyman (thompson) 358156 150gr hp, the cramer #26 hp (same as the lyman 358477 swc) & the home swaged jacketed 150gr hp preformed the best with every powder tested.

I will not say what the loads were but I've taken all 3 of those bullets up to the 950fps/975fps range with 2400 and power pistol.

Myself I prefer a 150gr/158gr bullet in a snub nosed 38spl compared to the 125gr bullets. Same velocity and more thump.

Anyway just more 39spl testing in snubnosed revolvers.
 
Register to hide this ad
In my 6" 686 with 38 cases with a lead 158gr LSWC, I Got;

Unique ................... max 1014
2400 .................... 11gr 972
Blue ..................... max 1020
4227 ...........Compressed 922
HS-6 ..................... max 939

Trail Boss, Red Dot and Bullseye at 755 fps gave the best accuracy
for a light target load in my revolver.
 
Forrest
Do you know why Power Pistol is showing velocities similar to 2400?
PP is known to be a fast, high performance, high energy powder for semiauto's at 33 on the burn rate chart and 2400 is known to be a slower magnum powder at 55 on the burn rate chart.
On Alliant safety sheet, they both have the same NG and NC % range
PP's energy is very close to Bullseye at 5158 kj/kg, with 2400's energy at 4220 kj/kg

Just curious!

I gotta get one of those 39 specials....Rule 3 has one too...:D

Forest
 
Last edited:
A few years back a buddy o mine loaded up some Lee 158RNFP in 38Sp +P configuration. The loads were 5.4 and 6.0 Power Pistol, and 10 gr 2400. All lods were chrono'd at 10' from the muzzle. Firearms were Ruger SP 101 3"and S&W 686 4". Av velocities were as follows:
Ruger, PP #1 888fps 60es 22sd
Ruger, PP #2 970fps 56es 25sd
Ruger, 2400. 888fps 40es 14sd

Smith PP#1. 903fps 60es 22sd
Smith PP#2. 994fps 45es 17sd
Smith 2400. 912fps 55es 22sd

His thinking was, pffft save the 2400 for more potent loadings. Power Pistol is great for +P
YMMV
 
Forrest
Do you know why Power Pistol is showing velocities similar to 2400?
PP is known to be a fast, high performance, high energy powder for semiauto's at 33 on the burn rate chart and 2400 is known to be a slower magnum powder at 55 on the burn rate chart.
On Alliant safety sheet, they both have the same NG and NC % range
PP's energy is very close to Bullseye at 5158 kj/kg, with 2400's energy at 4220 kj/kg

Just curious!

I gotta get one of those 39 specials....Rule 3 has one too...:D

Forest

I have no idea why pp does as good as it does in the 38spl p+ reloads. Some powders just seem to do better than others in with different caliber/bullet combo's.

For some reason pp and 150/158gr bullets do very well in 38spl p+ loads. But pp does not do nearly as well with 125gr bullets in 38spl p+ loads.

38spl p+ loads for snubnosed revolvers:
pp for 158gr bullets.
unique for 125gr bullets.
 
Forrest r - little late reading this since I was out of pocket for a time. Great information regarding Power Pistol (be-84) - I've gotten great performance with this powder particularly with 158 gr cast bullets. I've linked your post and thank you again. You put much effort into your tests/post! Great job!

My load of 5.6 grs PP/158 gr SWC gets me approx. 975 -1,000 fps from 6 inch revolver. Approximates Remington 38 Spl +P 158 gr LHP velocities. Great plinking and woods load. Has just enough power for most stuff you may encounter outside of Bear country.
 
Back
Top