For most recreational shooter they can get away with it, but being used in Afghan. Or Iraq then I can see needing it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I've never seen dust and/or sand like in the Middle East. It gets into EVERYTHING, no matter how sealed it is. That is one instance where a dust cover helps but the rifle needs to be run dry too.
Me too..don't force it if it won't go.Actually the forward assist was one of those things the military insisted on "because soldiers want something to push on like they're used to". They were referring to the M-14 (and M-1) operating rod.
Eugene Stoner didn't want one; he felt if pushing on the thumb divot on the bolt didn't seat the round, the best thing was to get that round outa there. I personally agree with him.
While both features are admittedly "nice", and look real cool, they are largely un-necessary.
The scallop on the bolt already allows the user to seat a slightly out-of-battery round, so the forward assist often just serves to make a genuine jam, worse. It's redundant, if not counter productive.
But, the military boys got them, so every tubby,basement-dwelling Doofus With A Debit Card (DWADC) just gots to have them too.(this pretty much describes the entire AR/AK upgrade/accessory market).
The dust cover is actually a beneficial feature, but as stated already, in severely dusty environments, it's still nearly useless.
And these severely dusty environments don't exist in the vast majority of this country.
And, of course, in the middle of one of these popularly imagined, domestic, 1000-rd firefights, the dust cover will still be wide open the entire time. Whatcha gonna do THEN ??
As I said, they're nice to have (sorta), and they surely look cool, but their value in the real world is not nearly is high as is generally assumed.
(I never felt even remotely under-gunned with a humble Sport I).
That is all.
The bullet isn't always the problemActually the forward assist was one of those things the military insisted on "because soldiers want something to push on like they're used to". They were referring to the M-14 (and M-1) operating rod.
Eugene Stoner didn't want one; he felt if pushing on the thumb divot on the bolt didn't seat the round, the best thing was to get that round outa there. I personally agree with him.
I followed in range. The guy is on par with Gabe SuarezIf you guys don't follow In Range take the time and watch some of their videos. Generally good stuff like shooting 2 gun matches with one using a Garand and a 1911, the other a K98k and a P-38.
They kept getting asked to do mud tests and gave in doing a few. They did a AK-47 and it kinda failed. The AK fan boys lost their ever love'n minds! They did a AR and it had no problems like this one. The AK fan boys lost their ever love'n minds again. They explained how the AK with lots of openings wouldn't do well and the AR with very little ways to let mud is just a different design, not better. The AK fan boys lost their minds again and accused them of all sorts of things. Pretty funny.
The guy with the goatee is Ian McCollum. He has a web site/video channel on his own, Forgotten Weapons. Great if your interested in the history of firearms.