The CZ-75 B, .40 S&W

[OLDNAVYMCPO]

I like the .40 S&W cartridge and handguns made for it. I mostly just punch holes in paper ( no more combat or handgun hunting) and the .40 S&W does everything I want it to do. I could use a .22 or a 9mm but I enjoy the felt recoil and the accuracy of the .40 S&W.

My first .40 S&W was the fullsize MP40 that I bought for my wife to use since she was a novice shooter and feared the recoil of my 1911's. She was handy with my Beretta 92fs but didn't like the way it fit her hand. She could shoot the MP40f just fine. That led me to acquiring a MP40c which I shot more accurately than the MP40f.

I prefer metal guns over polymer because I'm old and a traditionalist. I wanted a S&W 4006 police turn-in that was for sale on an internet discount gun site. Before I could wrap my mind around buying it, it was out of stock. As a consolation I bought a used but LNIB SIG 226 DAK in .40 S&W. I really like that gun but prefer a single-action trigger and an exposed hammer spur.

Next, my thoughts turned to an all metal construction, SA/DA trigger with exposed hammer spur. The CZ-75B in .40 S&W caught my eye, so I bought one.

Most of you are familiar with the CZ-75 design, the B designation just indicates a hammer block. The CZ-75 seems to me to be the next logical step in the evolution of Browning's designs from the 1911, thru the Browning HP to the CZ75. Before you purist get your skivvies in a knot, I'm just stating my opinion.

Below are photos of my 40's.

 

[OLDNAVYMCPO]

Range Report

Took my CZ-75 to the range to compare its performance with my other .40 S&W's.

The CZ-75B has a thumb safety, not a hammer drop like the 92fs, but a simple on-off that also locks the slide similar to that on the 1911 or the HP. Unlike the 1911 but like the Browning HP, it has no grip safety.

The magazine release functions with ease and positively drops even an empty mag. It is a thumb operated button at the rear of the trigger guard as on a 1911. The gun will fire with the magazine removed.

The factory 3 dot sights are satisfactory for my use and are drift adjusted. the gun shot close to point of aim with my reloads.

The slide on the CZ rides on rails inside the frame body rather than outside as on the 1911 and HP. The barrel is held tight at the muzzle by the slide as is the HP, unlike the removable barrel bushing of the 1911.

The grip frame is ergonomically designed and makes for point-ability which aids in a rapid first shot.

Field stripping is slightly different than either the HP or the 1911, just follow the instructions.

Two things that I find negative to say about the CZ is that the single action trigger has excessive creep which may or may not improve with use and the hammer spur is more narrow than I prefer.

The photos below are probably more indicative of my poor shooting skills rather than the gun's inherent accuracy. I usually do better with the MP40c. All target were shot at 15 yards.

 

[Arik]

Nice gun hope you like it. For me it is one of those guns I like on paper but not in actual use

 

[growr]

I have 5-6 Cz's and they are fabulous in every regard to me. The ergonomics are such that almost anyone of any size can pick one up and comment how well it feels to them.

Accuracy and reliability are superb as well.....I think that the more you shoot yours the more your accuracy will improve.

Whats not to love about an all steel gun that fits, is accurate, reliable and fun to shoot?

Randy

PS. I like being able to carry mine cocked & locked....just like my 1911's!

 

[dawggunner]

I have a CZ75B in 9MM that I never plan to part with. It shoots as good as any other 'nail driver'.

 

[galena]

I like my CZs, have three, all in 9mm: a CZ 85, a CZ75BD full size and a compact CZ75BD. I like the de-cocker better than the 1911 style safety.

If you like shooting .40SW, I am having a great time with two RIA 1911A1s in .40. One is the Mid-size (Commander) and the other a full size. They both have ramped barrels and I have had no feeding problems with either. Fun shooters and won't break the bank when you buy one.

 

[BigBill]

I have a CZ85BD in 9mm luger it's one of the finest pistols in 9mm I love the double action first shot. My cz 83 & 82's are just as good.

I have 1911/45acp. I been wanting a 10mm but not sure is there a big difference between the 40cal & 45acp?

 

[Marshwheeling]

CZ were my first guns, so I came to my CZ75BD favorably disposed. It has not disappointed me. With somewhere in the neighborhood of 1000 rounds through it, performance has been flawless. In feels good in the hand, points naturally and shoots much better than I do.

It is not a carry gun for me, but I would not hesitate to carry it decocked with a round in the chamber.

There is now a gap in my lineup of CZs, however. I do hope that I will have the money to spare if I ever come across a CZ82, or enough someday just to bite the bullet and order one.

 

[Double-O-Dave]

I'm quite a fan of CZ handguns. I have two Model 75s, one in 9mm and the other in .40 S&W (pictured). I also own a Model 82 in 9mm Makarov (pictured) and a Model 70 in .32ACP. Unfortunately, I cannot get photos of my other CZs to load. I acquired the Model 75 in .40 S&W in a trade for a S&W Model 6906 that I couldn't hit a barn door with. Unfortunately for me, the compact 3rd Generation S&W semiautos just don't shoot well for me despite a lot of practice and desire.

Regards,

Dave

 

[growr]

Isn't the Model 82/83 an under-rated gun for the money?

I have one in the herd and am thrilled with it alongside my CZ 75, my 75b's, my CZ40B's, and my EAA Witness's.....

Randy

 

[Marshwheeling]

Isn't the Model 82/83 an under-rated gun for the money?

I have one in the herd and am thrilled with it alongside my CZ 75, my 75b's, my CZ40B's, and my EAA Witness's.....

Randy

No, they are over-priced, over-rated east European commie junk, and I wish you would refer to them that way until I find one at a good price.

 

[growr]

I see them here in Montana for $200-250 on a semi frequent basis...ammo is spotty however.

 

[bigmatt17073]

I'm a huge CZ fan and currently own 5 of them plus a Swiss "Clone" all in 9mm except the CZ82 in 9mm Mak. Here is my Czechnology family photo.

 

[JayPee]

I too am a CZ fan, having bought my first one in 1992, a CZ 85. Since then I have owned a CZ 75B .40, a CZ 83, a CZ 40B, and my present carry gun, a CZ 85B. My wife also carries the '85B. The single action trigger pull on the full size CZ's is indeed a little creepy for target work, but these are combat guns intended for hard service in which a little trigger creep would go totally unnoticed. IMO the superior ergonomics more than make up for the creepy SA pull.

I hate to bring up the opposition, but I have now tried two of the TriStar C100 clones, and they too are first rate guns. After all, look at what they copied - hard to go wrong.