Perhaps we should have a thread or two about "bad provenance" or perhaps "the lengths some will go to make a profit." I'll give one humorous, or sorry depending on your perspective, example and perhaps others will have stories too.
As most here know, RK Mesa is quite the engraved gun enthusiast and I've asked him more than a few times for advice and counsel and he's always willing to oblige. I came across a very nicely engraved gun a couple years ago supposedly completed by a master engraver in the 1960s. It was for sale for the princely sum of $25k as I remember and was signed by the master engraver.
RK Mesa warned me away from it and linked me to an auction ad from some years before where the gun was shown as attributed to the engraver but there was no signature or engraver's mark. The engraver died in 1970 but amazingly had managed to sign his name to the piece 45 years or so after he died. I surely liked the work but knowing the signature on it was faked would have bothered me every time I looked at it. . . .not that I would have paid $25k for it anyway.
Jeff
SWCA #1457
As most here know, RK Mesa is quite the engraved gun enthusiast and I've asked him more than a few times for advice and counsel and he's always willing to oblige. I came across a very nicely engraved gun a couple years ago supposedly completed by a master engraver in the 1960s. It was for sale for the princely sum of $25k as I remember and was signed by the master engraver.
RK Mesa warned me away from it and linked me to an auction ad from some years before where the gun was shown as attributed to the engraver but there was no signature or engraver's mark. The engraver died in 1970 but amazingly had managed to sign his name to the piece 45 years or so after he died. I surely liked the work but knowing the signature on it was faked would have bothered me every time I looked at it. . . .not that I would have paid $25k for it anyway.
Jeff
SWCA #1457
Last edited: