The Tragedy of Op. Tiger, prior to D-Day

Texas Star

US Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2005
Messages
20,360
Reaction score
16,164
Location
Texas
The following account was posted on another board by a friend of mine, a British Professor Emeritus of History. She often has fascinating bits of history to impart, and this is surely one. What a disaster! The lack of coordinated communications alone was a serious error, and also hindered British paratroop operations at Arnhem. This is the first I've read about this incident. It cost more US lives than were lost at Utah Beach on D-Day!




Operation Tiger
‘Operation Tiger’, or ‘Exercise Tiger’, was part of a series of landing exercises carried out on the beaches of south Devon prior to the D-Day landings in June 1944. However, ‘Operation Tiger’ is most famous for the disaster that occurred at Slapton Sands that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of men – some at sea and some on the beaches of Slapton Sands. Ten times more Americans died in Lyme Bay and on Slapton Sands than at Utah Beach on June 6th.

The beaches off south Devon had been selected for ‘Operation Tiger’ because of their similarity to the beach at ‘Utah’ where the Americans would be landing on June 6th. The population who lived near Slapton were moved out in late 1943 so that any manoeuvres and exercise that were carried out in the area were done so under the strictest of secrecy. The first of the training exercises was carried out in December 1943. The whole idea behind the series of exercises was to give the American forces training there as much of a likeness of what to expect as was possible. Therefore the exercises were tiered up as time progressed to make them as realistic as was possible. ‘Operation Tiger’ was to be one of the larger ones and was scheduled to last from April 22nd to April 30th.

The whole of ‘Operation Tiger’ was planned to be on a big scale – thousands of troops were meant to land under live fire – ordered by Eisenhower to make it as realistic as possible – and their landing ships were escorted by a small flotilla of naval ships headed by two destroyers. The first actual landings took place on April 27th. These were successful. However, a major disaster occurred in the early hours of April 28th that resulted in hundreded of deaths.

The Kriegsmarine kept a flotilla of S-boats in north France, mainly in Bologne and Cherbourg. Another flotilla was based in Guernsey. These were very fast, highly manoeuvrable small ships that carried torpedoes and two 20mm guns. Those involved in the Slapton Sands tragedy were equipped with supercharged engines that gave them a top speed of 40 knots if the conditions were good. They patrolled the English Channel and attacked any ship they came across working on the theory that the speed and manoeuvrability of the S-boats would get them out of trouble. In Britain, the S-boats were known as E-boats; ‘e’ for enemy.

The convoy left Plymouth on April 27th. Its destination was ‘Red Beach’ at Slapton Sands in Lyme Bay.

In the early hours of April 28th, nine S-boats spotted the eight landing ships in Lyme Bay that were sailing in a line and therefore made for an inviting target. The S-boats had been spotted by a Royal Navy corvette, HMS Azalea, but the captain assumed that the landing craft had also spotted them and did not directly inform them of the presence of S-boats.

The attack started at 01.33. Ships in the convoy were ordered not to return fire as this would have given away their positions. Darkness offered the convoy some protection as the logs of the S-boats later showed as they were convinved that they had hit “tankers”.

Three landing ships were hit. One (LST-507) caught fire and was abandoned. LST-289 caught fire but made it to the shore. LST-531 was hit and quickly sank. At 02.18, the order was given for the convoy to break-up formation and for individual ships to make they way independently ahead. The attack lasted until about 04.00. In the chaos that ensued, the nine S-boats left Lyme Bay with no casualties even though HMS Azalea attacked them.

The tragedy highlighted a number of major issues that needed to be resolved by D-Day. First, British naval headquarters and the landing craft operated off different radio frequencies and thus could not contact each other. When HMS Azalea contacted its headquarters in Plymouth with regards to what was going on, naval headquarters could not contact the landing craft direct to find out what was happening to them.

Second, a number of the fatalities had actually survived the torpedoing but when it came to abandoning their ship, had put on their life jackets incorrectly. Survivors later said that they saw men, who were in full combat gear, effectivly turned upside down because of the way they had put on their life jackets and they drowned. Clearly by June 6th, as tens of thousands of men would be carried across the Channel, this also had to be sorted out. Faith was put on the kapok life preserver jacket, which could only be put on in one particular manner. Similar to this another lifesaver was learned. Soldiers in landing craft at sea were advised to loosen their boots after an order to abandon ship had been given. It would make their removal in the sea a lot easier. Those in Lyme Bay would have little chance of removing soaked military boats in decent conditions, let alone at night with chaos all around them.

Third, the planning of D-Day had to be faultless and clearly the planning behind Operation Tiger had exposed a number of serious communication issues. The eight landing ships were meant to be escorted by two Royal Navy ships – HMS Azalea and HMS Scimitar. However, the escort had been reduced to one – Azalea – as Scimitar had returned to the dockyards at Plymouth for repairs. The Americans had not been told this. When the lack of full protection for the convoy was known, HMS Saladin was sent – at 01.37 on April 28th, four minutes after the attacks had started. British shore batteries had seen the S-boats but were ordered not to fire on them because that would give away to the Germans the fact that the shoreline was well defended.

The chaos continued on the beaches when men were killed by incoming friendly fire from HMS Hawkins. Eisenhower had ordered the use of live ammunition to make the exercise as lifelike as possible. However, a further 308 Americans were killed. In total, it is thought that 946 men died at sea and on land. However, some military historians believe that the figure is a lot higher and that this accounts for why there was no official recognition of the tragedy even after the success of D-Day. Keeping quiet about the tragedy prior to D-Day was understandable as any news of what happened would have undoubtedly undermined morale – especially for those on the landing crafts that were going to be used. The lack of any reporting of the tragedy after D-Day may simply be explained by the fact that those in charge had their eyes fixed firmly on what was happening in Normandy.

Ten of the fatalities were of great importance. When D-Day was planned, the men who had prior knowledge of the invasion were known as ‘bigots’. While the daqte was not yet known to the ‘bigots’, the landing sites were. Ten ‘bigots’ were unaccounted for in the immediate aftermath of Operation Tiger. No one knew if by chance any one of them had been captured by the S-boats. It was only after the ten bodies had been accounted for that the plans for D-Day continued.

Obviously nothing of what happened at Slapton Sands was made public. Medical staff at military hospitals who treated the wounded were sworn to secrecy under pain of court martial if they even asked the injured how they acquired their wounds. It was briefly referred to in a July 1944 copy of ‘Stars and Stripes’ but by this month, the interest was very much in what was happening in Normandy.

On May 5th, Rear Admiral John Hall reported on the still highly clasified incident. He apologised to the Americans but put the blame on the sheer intensity of the build-up to D-Day; Hall argued that with thousands of important communication signals being sent daily, some were bound not to get through or be acted on. What happened at Lyme Bay was seen as something that happened in wartime as tragic as it was.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I believe this gave rise......

I believe that rumors of dead and burned bodies washing up on shore went wild in England and made some people think that an invasion on the island was imminent. Since this was the only part of the operation that became known or that there was ever any 'operation' at all, without any follow up info the rumors just died out.

This almost became lost to history, partially because it was not only a tragedy, but a debacle and an embarrassment that no one wanted to remember.

That's a great account....Thanks.
 
Last edited:
According to some TV shows, this incident was classified "burn before reading" until the 1990s. Only problem with this claim is that I am certain I read about it in a war supplement volume to a set of encyclopedias given to my father in the late 1940s. For sure, I knew about it long before any of the shows about it on the Discovery Channel or Military Channel.

Lots of stuff in those books that has since been announced as "recently declassified" by the deep voiced voice-over guy.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Was there good that came of this--by "good" I am saying information that allowed planners some room for change.
This incident has never been covered up.
It is a sad fact of war that some die from friendly fire--botched plans--or just plain poor planning.
What about planning on the fly is not to be understood.
It happens all the time.
Some of you expect perfection from others but never consider your own "OS's".
Blessings
 
Whatever 'good' came of it.....

Whatever 'good' came of it cost a heck of a lot. It seems they might as well have gone straight to the real invasion. More people would have been killed on UTAH but maybe not quite as many. Maybe it counts for little that you were killed in 'practice' rather than killed in 'the landing'.
 
The story was classified for around 40 years. It kade the news in the 1980s when Reagan was President. I remember watching it on the Today show as they interviewed survivors. There may have been previous references to it in some special interest literature, but the full report did not come out until 1983 or 1984 or there abouts.

Sgt. Rock was still published at the time, and the events were worked into a story.
 
I first learned of this incident NO LATER than the '80s, when I ran across a book about it in the [sadly missed] main Kroch's and Brentano's book store in downtown Chicago.

Every time some dope tells me "the government couldn't hide <insert crime>" I point out Slapton Sands. Needless to say, they invariably get a blanker look on their faces than Rosie O'Donnell after being asked, "If fire can't melt steel, how do they MAKE it?"
 
War is Hell. Over 900 men died when the USAT Dorchester-the Four Chaplains-was sunk, 370 men died when the USS Mount Hood blew up in Seeadler Harbor. And the Wehrmacht and Kriegsmarine were no pushovers.
 
Is that something like.....

Lots of stuff in those books that has since been announced as "recently declassified" by the deep voiced voice-over guy.:rolleyes:

Is that like the guy with the excited voice in K-Tel record deals that tell you that the CDs are 'actual recordings'? 'Actual recordings' of bogus artists, that is.
 
Last edited:
How hard would it of been to put an airplane with radar over this armada? By late 1943 the Americans and British were both expert at spotting a tiny U-boat conning tower at night and 10 miles distant. If they had wanted to they could of seen those S-boats leaving harbor on the French Coast. But those kinds of "eye in the sky" tactics hadn't been developed yet, though they possessed the basic equipment. Rudimentary, though it was. (The USN was introducing just such an airborne system in the Pacific, carrier based and amazingly sophisticated, right in this same time frame).
 
Last edited:
Jack Higgins' book Night of the Fox (copyright 1986) is based on the events Operation Tiger.

I also remember the Sgt. Rock story
 
This story reminds me of something my dad told me from his hospital bed in his last days. He was a WWII vet stationed in the Fiji Islands. He never talked about his war experience until his last few days. On the TV in his hospital room there was a news story about the 50th anniversary of the dropping of the bomb, and how some people were now calling it a racist act. I thought he was sleeping but he raised his head and said to the TV, "You *******. you don't know what you're talking about!!! I was stunned by his outburst in his weakened state. I said "well that sure woke you up." He then said "if it wasn't for that bomb, you wouldn't be here!" He then, for the first time ever, began to open up to me about the war.

Similar to the OP story, he told me the troops where he was stationed, spent many months practicing for the invasion of Japan and that many men died practicing landings, etc. He said the worst though, was the waiting -waiting for the order to invade the heavily fortified Japanese beach. They also knew that the Japanese would never surrender and would fight to the last breath. He said the waiting was hell, and some men literally lost their minds when they couldn't take it anymore. He said some even committed suicide. Everyone knew the invasion of Japan would cost many more American lives than D Day. Then after they heard about D Day and all the casualties, they knew their call would come soon. The practice intensified along with the practice casualties. He said the tension became unbearable. Then suddenly, they were told to stand down. We dropped a new kind of bomb called an "A Bomb" and the Japanese surrendered. He told me it took quite a while for the guys to believe. They thought it might be some kind of cruel joke.

Excuse the long post, but the OP story brought back to mind this conversation between an old vet (gone a long time now)on his death bed and his son. It still brings a tear, to think that he carried all of this inside for 50 years.
 
“Ships in the convoy were ordered not to return fire as this would have given away their positions.”

If the enemy is shooting at you, you can pretty much assume your position is “given away.”


“HMS Azalea”

Who would name a fighting ship after a pretty flower?


“British shore batteries had seen the S-boats but were ordered not to fire on them because that would give away to the Germans the fact that the shoreline was well defended.”

Better to let men die? What’s the point to having guns if you don’t intend to use them?
 
Back
Top