What years did the FBI issue the Model 13?

[aterry33]

Anyone know the range?

 

[1 old 0311]

I just saw this recently the weapons, and dates, of the FBI. Let me think where I saw it..........Glocktalk maybe?

 

[st regis]

hang on...there are some current and former agents on here who have talked about these guns before...I always like to see their responses

 

[sigp220.45]

I went through new agent training in 1991, and the issue at that time was the Sig P226, purchased off the DEA contract. The 1076 had just been recalled - I believe it was adopted in 1990.

The Model 13 was the issue prior to the 1076, so the end of its run would have been sometime in 1990.

That leaves the question of starting date. SCSW3 says 1984, which could be correct. Most of the guys in my first office were still carrying revolvers and the vast majority of them were Model 13s. A couple of guys in the middle of their careers were carrying 2 1/2 inch Model 10s. The old timers were carrying four inch standard barrel Model 10s. The guys with maximum cool points were carrying Colt Pythons and Detective Specials that were grandfathered in.

I hope someone who has actually researched this chimes in, but I think 1984 - 1990 would be a pretty fair guess.

 

[rburg]

My brother is a retired FBI agent (retired in 1999). He became an agent back in the 60s (1960s, smart asses). I remember a discussion in the 1970s that indicated there were still a number of agents carrying the old standby M27s (or earlier ). Those too were grandfathered in, apparently.

 

[LSP 972]

I went through new agent training in 1991...

Question for you.

What was the rationale given (if one ever was) for dis-allowing snubby .38 revolvers as back-ups?

I know of at least two incidents where an FBI agent suffered a malfunction of his semi-auto during a contact struggle with a bad guy; no fault of the agents, just an easily-induced problem with ANY semi-auto. The revolver does not have this problem, generally.

I was a panel member and presenter at the '93 Wound Ballistics Seminar at Quantico, so I know how anal the Bureau is about keeping records of such things. Those of us in the non-federal training community were flabbergasted when we heard of the edict... what in the world were they thinking?????

.

 

[sigp220.45]

I think it was strictly a budgetary thing. Even though a revolver is personally owned, the gun vault at Quantico has to maintain it. They have to keep a supply of parts on hand, and have to keep gunsmiths trained up on it.

There was also a training issue. Guys were coming out of Quantico with no revolver training, buying a Model 60, stumbling through a single qualification course, and sallying forth with their new snubby in an ankle holster and their issued semi-auto in the trunk.

And finally, by doing away with revolvers they also did away with the need to buy .38 Special wadcutters and duty ammo.

Personally, I think the appropriate answer to the above problems would be to buy parts, train gunsmiths, train agents on revolvers, and buy .38 ammo. In this case, beancounters won out.

I bought a Glock 27 to replace my beloved Chief's Special ("five-shot" in Bureau parlance) and its been a good gun.

 

[dmc8163]

I entered on duty with the FBI in February 1980 and at that time I was issued a Model 10-8 2 1/2". Beautiful piece. By September 1980 Model 13s were being issued. If I recall correctly.

 

[dmc8163]

As for snubbies, I first carried an FBI issue Colt Detective Special as a backup gun. When the Colts were recalled by the Gun Vault and destroyed I turned to a personally owned S&W Model 36. The neat thing about snubbies was that the qualification course included the 50 yard line. We only had to qualify once a year with these revolvers. So let's see, basically shoot it once a year and you have to hit the target repeatedly at 50 yds with it. I can't describe how much fun that was. That Model 36 was my backup gun for over 20 years and I still own it.

 

[BUFF]

"Guys were coming out of Quantico with no revolver training, buying a Model 60, stumbling through a single qualification course, and sallying forth with their new snubby in an ankle holster and their issued semi-auto in the trunk."

Apparently, sometimes carrying even a "five shooter" was too much trouble for a few agents. Years back, we had an agent stop in a bank during his lunch hour to cash a check or something. It got robbed while he was there. Somehow, the press discovered he had no gun with him at the time. Rude comments were made.

It amazes me how often cops from all kinds of agencies see their sidearm as merely a requirement or accessory. I can remember some of the detectives in my agency carrying only a 2 inch .38 on duty, and even that was under the seat of their car most of the time.

 

[Federalis]

I entered on duty in June '85 and the M13 had been issued for awhile. Had to finally turn it back into the vault in Dec. 2001. Was a great little revolver, bet I could'nt hit anything with it now at 50 yards!

 

[sheriffoconee]

I entered on duty with the FBI in February 1980 and at that time I was issued a Model 10-8 2 1/2". Beautiful piece. By September 1980 Model 13s were being issued. If I recall correctly.

My dad was an agent from 64-84...he is pretty certain he got his M13 in 1980 as well...he had it a few years before he retired....but he still carried his personally owned M10 2 inch every day....

 

[LSP 972]

I think it was strictly a budgetary thing.

Well, all that DOES make sense... to a bean counter. Interesting...

Thanks.
.

 

[sheriffoconee]

I HATE being lumped in with the bean counters, but I had the same problem in 1992 when I took office....I had deputies carrying 38's, 9's, 357's, 40's, 44's, 10mm, 45's, and without a doubt I am missing something.
They had to buy their own ammo, so I budgeted money for ammo at first...quite frankly, even with a small office it was a logistical nightmare...
SOOOO, we bought 40 caliber Glocks (their overwhelming choice) 22's an 23's.....
Since 1992, we have authorized and inventoried various other calibers, such as 9mm and 45ACP....along with 12 gauge buckshot, 5.56 and 7.62.
NOW, we are going back to the future, and have rewritten our policy to include authorizing other weapons in other calibers, however, the deputy has to provide his or her own ammo....such as my M58...I have to buy my own 41 mag if I want to qualify with it (and I will this month)

 

[LSP 972]

I understand the problems; I ran the Louisiana State Police Firearms Training Unit for many years. Of course, back then GETTING ammunition was no big deal; it was a hassle dealing with the Purchasing weenies, but paperwork is paperwork. These days, just getting the stuff to your door is a major undertaking; a pal at the local sheriff's office has been told it will be after Thanksgiving before he will receive his ordered .45 ball for training. That's at the state contract price... naturally, they'll sell him all he can handle at retail. Profiteering bastards...

Personally-owned weapons had to be signed off on by me or one of my armorers, but upkeep was the trooper's responsibility. Yes, we had some headaches; there will always be some dipstick who thinks he knows better than his instructors (via reading gun magazines).

But the bottom line is, denying something useful to the troops because you, as an administrative type, would rather not be bothered with the minutiae involved, borders on criminal neglect in my book. (Not saying you were neglectful, sheriffoconee; just speaking in general terms).

I understand why the Bureau requires Gun Vault responsibility for all agent weapons; it provides a degree of control and continuity. And in today's litigous atmosphere, it is undoubtedly the best approach to avoid problems.

But it still sucketh for the line troops. J frames aren't that hard to work on, and rarely NEED working on; and with what funds the Bureau pisses away on frivilous stuff, keeping a parts inventory and a trained mechanic or three is a pittance.

But I was never one to totally agree with The Big Picture (as seen by those who had either never spent any time on the line, or had forgotten what it was like). That eventually cost me, but I survived to retire and be able to sit back and criticize from afar...

.

 

[Calfed]

This thread's getting a little moldy--but I'm not sure anyone has made the point clearly that even though the Bureau stopped approving new .38 revolvers back in the 90's, we moss-backed oldsters were allowed to carry our previously approved, personally owned revolvers until relatively recently. I think that my authority to carry my 2" Model 49 was revoked sometime in 2007.

I always found the justification for revoking the authority to carry revolvers--the gun vault's inability to afford spare parts and service -- laughable. I carried my Model 49 on my ankle, on my hip and in the pocket of my top coat for over 27 years and it never needed one whit of service.

 

[roaddog28]

Hi,
According to the Smith & Wesson book by Jim Supica & Richard Nahas the M13 evolved from the M10-6. The 10-6 was a prototype of the later model 13 chambered in 357. FBI issued the model 13 in 1974 and 1986 to 1987. The 13-1 was introduced for the N.Y.S.P in 1974. I have a model 13-2 4 inch made in the 1977 era. One of my favorite K frame magnums.
Howard

 

[Dpris]

I was reading all these later dates & scratching my head over distinctly recalling an FBI Model 13 I saw in 1976.
Thanks, Howard.
Denis

 

[akviper]

I went through an FBI taught firearms instructor class in 1979. Two of the Anchorage agents teaching the class had just returned from inservice training at Quantico and were packing newly issued three inch Model 13s. Those of us packing Model 19s and Model 66s looked down on the lowly fixed sight guns. Now I regularly carry a three inch Model 65. It is one of my favorite carry guns. I figure I still have a lot to learn.

 

[Dpris]

The one I recall was a 3-incher.
Brought to a local small-town PD training session by an outa-towner who said it was the new FBI gun.
Denis