"Would-be robber killed in fight with store clerk"

Register to hide this ad
Originally posted by norad45:
Police say they believe the clerk was justified in shooting the suspect.
Ya' think!

Brian~
 
One for the good guys. The piece of crap won't be doing that anymore
icon_biggrin.gif
 
I always like it when the victim holds court and a guilty verdict is rendered.

Much cheaper and more efficient in these hard times.
 
Originally posted by Joni_Lynn: I hope the clerks don't lose their jobs for doing the right thing.
At least the employer can't use the "...it's against Company Policy for you to be carrying a gun on the job..." since the employee didn't bring in the gun.
icon_cool.gif
icon_cool.gif
icon_cool.gif
 
No, but some employer's policy is to do what the robber asks, do not risk your life, and do not take matter into your own hands.

yeah, sure, get right on that...
 
I hope that if this girl gets the axe the shoppers in that area will vote with their feet and put the store out of business.
 
The report said the guy died from a single gunshot wound to the head from a .22 rifle. I guess it rattled around in there a bit. Good for her!
 
Sheriff: "There was no way of knowing what was going through his mind"

I would say that question was cleared up pretty definitively. 22LR.
 
I much prefer this outcome to the far more common ending.



Climb Mt. Niitaka
 
Originally posted by Amici:
I much prefer this outcome to the far more common ending.
I know that's the conventional wisdom but there have been studies that show guns are used far more often to prevent crimes than to commit them.

Here are some analysis I try to keep on the tip of my brain for antigunners willing to listen.

FBI Uniform Crime Report

Defensive Gun Uses studies by the Government and by credentialed scholars, were summarized by Tom W. Smith in a piece under joint copyright by him and Northwestern University School of Law in 1997. What is of significance here is that the estimates for Defensive Gun Usage range from a low of .76 million to a high of 3.61 million base on one to five year's recall. Based on the range of these studies, guns are used anywhere from about over two an one half to almost twelve times more often to defend against crimes than to commit them. The years may not match but the idea is obvious.

Smith's Range of Defensive Gun Uses

Do DGUs help? Here's what Statistician, John Lott has to say:

Defensive Gun Uses (DGU)per year:

Low DGU: 764,036/Yr, 2.54 times more frequent than firearms used criminally nationwide for the offenses listed.
High DGU: 3,609,682/Yr, 11.99 times more frequent than firearms used criminally nationwide for the offenses listed. (Note: he high figure was from an L.A. Times Study.)

Percent Injured after Self Protection Action
(SP = Self Protection Action. O = Offender)

ACTION_____________________ROBBERY____ASSAULT
Any SP with gun______________ 7.7%_______3.6%
Chased, tried to catch O______9.6%_______9.0%
Ran/drove away; tried to______4.9%_______5.4%
Screamed from pain, fear_____22.0%______12.6%
Threatened O without weapon__15.8%______13.6%
No SP measures at all________23.6%______55.2%

Lott's table

Next to running away, having a gun is the most successful means of self defense during a robbery but having a gun is most effective during an assault.

Fewer than one percent of DGUs result in killing or wounding anyone.

Kleck's commentary

(How does one change fonts, say to Courier or another monospace font to make the table spacing come out visually correct?)
 
Originally posted by Glitch:
Sheriff: "There was no way of knowing what was going through his mind"

I would say that question was cleared up pretty definitively. 22LR.
LOL
icon_biggrin.gif
icon_biggrin.gif
icon_biggrin.gif
 
Originally posted by 5Wire:
Originally posted by Amici:
I much prefer this outcome to the far more common ending.
I know that's the conventional wisdom but there have been studies that show guns are used far more often to prevent crimes than to commit them.
How would this one be counted statistically? The gun was both used in a crime and used to stop a crime. Is it a wash?
icon_wink.gif
 
"Would-be robber killed in fight with store clerk"

There's no "would-be" about it. He was a robber, plain and simple (and now plainly and simply no longer a threat to humanity).
 
Back
Top