|
|
|
12-18-2020, 01:36 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,225
Likes: 34,869
Liked 10,791 Times in 3,677 Posts
|
|
Yes Arlen it's safe to shoot 455. You might even can shoot 45 Colt if you had any. The Colts probably a better man stopper than the Webley.
Guy
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-18-2020, 02:02 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake Martin, Alabama
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2,196
Liked 3,245 Times in 830 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
lamarw & mrcvs,
Thank you both for the additions to the research study!
Congrats!! Those are both extremely nice examples at a very fair price!
The Triple Lock has the wrong stocks, it's true. But they are much more scarce, worth more than the correct stocks, and are from the 1930s with flat silver medallions. The correct stocks with recessed gold plated medallions are not hard to find since there were ~90,000 produced.
It's misrepresented in the auction description as being in the 44 HE 1st model serial range of 15,000. But it's actually #2934 British Svc Revolver serial range of the 2nd version:
“.455 Mark II HE - 1st Model TL” in the new .455 British serial # range 1 to over 5800* shipped 1914-15. Thus creating 67 duplicate serial #s with the 666 1st version in #1. above in the “.44 HE 1st Model TL” .455 factory conversion serial number range.
*Previously reported as 1 to 5461. After this shipment there were some of this model sold commercially all in the 5502 - 5857 range, but including a few military issues in that range as well.
The revolver #30825 BSR of the 3rd version:
3. “.455 Mark II HE - 2nd Model” (sans extractor barrel shroud and 3rd lock), and the cylinder ctr pin hole in the extractor star is reduced .020” with the associated Ext Rod rear tip reduced .020” in diameter from the TL versions, the ".44 HE 1st Model Triple Lock" factory converted to .455, and the ".455 HE 1st Model Triple Lock" produced in .455 (documented in Neal & Jinks Pg. 215-16.) This version was referred to as the MK II revolver by the British and stamped ‘II’ by them, upper left rear side of frame. The 2nd Model continued in the .455 1st Model TL Brit serial range and beginning ~ after #5857 (previously thought to be 5462) to #74755, shipped 1915-17.
The grips don't fit properly and may be off the TL; check penciled serial # on the back of the right grip to verify if it matches the TL #2934.
It's interesting that both are stamped "Simpson LTD" on the butt.
|
Thank you Jim for both your kind and informative comments. I too, wondered about the Simpson LTD stampings. They could of been the consignor or someone purchased both revolvers from them and later was the consignor. I do not know whether Simpson LTD is an importer or not.
The auction price shown in above attachment included the buyer's premium.
|
12-18-2020, 03:16 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,225
Likes: 34,869
Liked 10,791 Times in 3,677 Posts
|
|
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
12-18-2020, 03:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 4
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
You men are great people. Thank you.
Arlan
|
12-18-2020, 04:42 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Arlan,
Yes, it's perfectly safe to shoot the 455 in your gun! Shoot as many as you want.
It would still be interesting to know if a 45 Colt fit in the chambers, those are perfectly safe too if they fit.
Either one would ruin the meth head's day!
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 12-18-2020 at 04:43 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-18-2020, 04:52 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake Martin, Alabama
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2,196
Liked 3,245 Times in 830 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
|
Thanks Guy, I did research this a little bit earlier.
I got your PM and attempted to respond. I am getting a message my PM box is over filled. I have attempted to empty it with little apparent if any apparent results.
|
12-18-2020, 05:32 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,225
Likes: 34,869
Liked 10,791 Times in 3,677 Posts
|
|
Lamar,
You have to empty both the Inbox and Sent messages folders. There is a drop down menu above the folder controls color bar to let you select which box. Just click on the down caret to select Inbox or Sent folders.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-31-2020, 12:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 317
Likes: 2,695
Liked 1,170 Times in 223 Posts
|
|
Here is my 2nd Model. Serial #65,305.
On left side of barrel: Smith & Wesson .455.
British Army broad arrow and Enfield proofed.
On right side marked E149.
It wears a 1917 cylinder for chambering .45 AR/ACP. The original cylinder was milled for .45 ACP.
Ken
http://attachment.php?attachmentid=4...1&d=1609432445
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 06:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 1
Liked 169 Times in 23 Posts
|
|
I have a TL .455 Webley Bisley Target # 4054 without caliber, only barrel S&W address above, built around 1906
And a 2nd model .455 Webley # 21938 also without caliber
best regards
Christian
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 12:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 702
Likes: 1,360
Liked 122 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
455s
1709 Triple lock 455
19478 2nd 455
22425 2nd 455
27465 2nd 455
B33498 2nd 455
B59365 2nd 455
all converted AR or Colt
__________________
Tommy
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2021, 11:39 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Triple Lock, SN: 3240, All original finish, No caliber marking, tons of British proofs so definitely military, also has what looks to be "OFL" marked on the butt of the left grip panel. Any idea what that might mean?
S&W Triple Lock - Album on Imgur
.455 Mark II, SN: 53433, Caliber marked "SMITH & WESSON .455", Crown over C marked on the butt (or maybe it's an O) so I think that makes it Canadian, shows original duller blued finish.
S&W .455 Hand Ejector Mark II - Album on Imgur
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-07-2021, 05:51 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 3,428
Liked 4,120 Times in 1,462 Posts
|
|
Triple Lock 2940 no caliber roll mark still in original chambering not modified original finish.
__________________
Randy
|
04-08-2021, 07:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somwhere Deep in a Blue State
Posts: 11
Likes: 4
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
I have a 2nd model, 6 1/2 inch .455, serial 26161, the revolver was imported from Canada back in the 1970's. I do not think it has the caliber marked on the barrel.
|
04-08-2021, 10:24 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolf
I have a TL .455 Webley Bisley Target # 4054 without caliber, only barrel S&W address above, built around 1906
And a 2nd model .455 Webley # 21938 also without caliber
best regards
Christian
|
Thank you for those two!
I would letter #4054 to confirm factory sight installation and exact shipping date. A fairly rare gun that could have some interesting history.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
04-08-2021, 10:40 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,842
Likes: 3,260
Liked 7,111 Times in 1,896 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Thank you for those two!
I would letter #4054 to confirm factory sight installation and exact shipping date. A fairly rare gun that could have some interesting history.
|
There was a whole thread about this revolver: Need help identifying and old S&W Revolver
|
04-08-2021, 10:40 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy F
1709 Triple lock 455
19478 2nd 455
22425 2nd 455
27465 2nd 455
2nd 455
all converted AR or Colt
|
Thank you for those:
1709 is a 2nd version; ".455 MkII - 1st Model", not caliber marked.
The rest are 3rd versions; ".455 MkII - 2nd Model":
22425 not cal marked.
27465 Is this one caliber marked on barrel?
B33498 & B59365 - the B is for blue finish and not part of the serial #. These two should be caliber marked.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
04-08-2021, 10:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Second Mod. .455
Hondo, I have another .455 for your information. It's a second model, number 21273 shipped to the Canadian Government in Ottawa on October 14, 1915. It's in very good shape and unmessed with. A bit of blue missing but about 90 %. It is marked .455 on the left side of the barrel. It is in almost new shape! If you need pictures will see if I can get my son to help me send you some. Best regards, John.
|
04-08-2021, 11:05 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoldenCaulk
Triple Lock, SN: 3240, All original finish, No caliber marking, tons of British proofs so definitely military, also has what looks to be "OFL" marked on the butt of the left grip panel. Any idea what that might mean?
S&W Triple Lock - Album on Imgur
.455 Mark II, SN: 53433, Caliber marked "SMITH & WESSON .455", Crown over C marked on the butt (or maybe it's an O) so I think that makes it Canadian, shows original duller blued finish.
S&W .455 Hand Ejector Mark II - Album on Imgur
|
Thanks for those two.
3240 is a 2nd version BSR; ".455 MkII - 1st Model". The OFL is almost assuredly the user's initials.
53433 - is a 3rd version BSR; ".455 MkII - 2nd Model". Crown over poorly stamped O on the butt. The # is likely too low to be one of the 14,500 Canadian shipped guns, but only a letter would confirm for sure.
Also all of these Svc revolvers, British and Canadian shipped guns have a shiny finish, not dull.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 04-08-2021 at 12:04 PM.
|
04-08-2021, 11:09 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by merl67
Triple Lock 2940 no caliber roll mark still in original chambering not modified original finish.
|
Thank you.
A 2nd version, “455 Mark II Hand Ejector-1st Model” Triple Lock.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 04-08-2021 at 12:03 PM.
|
04-08-2021, 12:02 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjruple
I have a 2nd model, 6 1/2 inch .455, serial 26161, the revolver was imported from Canada back in the 1970's. I do not think it has the caliber marked on the barrel.
|
It's a ".455 MkII - 2nd Model" 3rd version British Svc Revolver shipped from the USA in 1915.
Are there any British import, military or proof marks on it? It likely came from England to Canada earlier.
It's not likely caliber marked but to add to the study, it would have to be confirmed.
Thank you!
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
04-08-2021, 01:02 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMtoolman
Hondo, I have another .455 for your information. It's a second model, number 21273 It is in almost new shape! If you need pictures will see if I can get my son to help me send you some. Best regards, John.
|
Thank you.
Interesting, #'d amidst and shipped same time as a bunch with no caliber marking.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
05-24-2021, 12:22 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
Jim,
Just received a New Century, 455, serial 31. Photos of both sides of the barrel and top. Also butt frame.
Wrong stocks and missing lanyard stud and ring but it is still a Triple Lock
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-24-2021, 02:16 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Cool! It's the lowest # TL .455 I now have in my database!
It's a 2nd variation - “.455 Mark II HE - 1st Model TL” in the new .455 British serial # range 1 to over 5800* shipped 1914-15. Thus creating 67** duplicate serial #s with the 666 1st version in the “.44 HE 1st Model TL” .455 factory conversion serial number range.
Go to post #223, page 5 where I added it to my database, in this thread (updated 5/24/21).
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 05-24-2021 at 03:18 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-25-2021, 10:29 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
...It's a 2nd variation - “.455 Mark II HE - 1st Model TL” in the new .455 British serial # range 1 to over 5800* shipped 1914-15. Thus creating 67** duplicate serial #s with the 666 1st version in the “.44 HE 1st Model TL” .455 factory conversion serial number range.
Go to post #223, page 5 where I added it to my database, in this thread (updated 5/24/21)...
|
So, guessing it may have been in the October 1914 shipment to Remington UMC? Why R UMC, where they agents for the British procurement process?
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
05-25-2021, 10:39 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawHat
So, guessing it may have been in the October 1914 shipment to Remington UMC? Why R UMC, where they agents for the British procurement process?
Kevin
|
Yes, highly likely. Rem-UMC was their agent.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
05-26-2021, 12:33 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 316
Likes: 4
Liked 1,257 Times in 131 Posts
|
|
Jim, Can't remember if I sent my info to you on my .455 TL.
6 1/2" blue Sn.355 shipped Oct.1914. Has roll mark .455 on right side of barrel. Has been converted by factory to 45Colt, by recessing back of cyl/extractor. Lots of British proofs.
Richard
|
05-26-2021, 05:18 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hibbs
Jim, Can't remember if I sent my info to you on my .455 TL.
6 1/2" blue Sn.355 shipped Oct.1914. Has roll mark .455 on right side of barrel. Has been converted by factory to 45Colt, by recessing back of cyl/extractor. Lots of British proofs.
Richard
|
Richard,
It shows up in the updated data base on page 5, post 223.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
05-26-2021, 11:53 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: STL
Posts: 887
Likes: 1,100
Liked 4,189 Times in 547 Posts
|
|
66078 shipped July 1916 and marked:
__________________
SWCA: 3154
SWHF: 552
Last edited by LLOYD17; 05-26-2021 at 11:54 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-26-2021, 01:30 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Thank you.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
05-26-2021, 08:36 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 4
Liked 28 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
I used to own #43067
which was rollmarked
Just recently picked up #71989
which is also rollmarked
edit: not sure if this is the right place to ask this, but would anyone be able to tell me what the meaning of this stamp is?
full resolution here: https://i.imgur.com/aCeynd1.jpg
Above the grips on the left rear side of the frame, it appears to be a small 4 over a small E over roman numeral II
Last edited by flightlessgreeb; 05-26-2021 at 08:51 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-27-2021, 11:08 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Thank you. Those are unit markings for which unit it was issued to and the British crown stamp. The II stands for the British designation for the 2nd model, Mark II.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 05-27-2021 at 02:41 PM.
Reason: Thank you Wiregrassguy and Absalom, I stand corrected.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-27-2021, 11:20 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,547
Likes: 89,899
Liked 24,943 Times in 8,538 Posts
|
|
Y'all shouldn't let the dawg use a S&W as a chew toy.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-27-2021, 11:43 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,225
Likes: 34,869
Liked 10,791 Times in 3,677 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Thank you. Those are unit markings for which unit it was issued to and the British crown stamp. The II stands for the British designation for the 2nd model, Mark II.
|
The way I understand those markings from Pate's US Handguns of WWII is the top arrow stamp is called the "broad arrow" and signifies government ownership of the weapon. Below that is the military inspector's mark that usually consists of a crown over a number/letter combination signifying the inspector and his/her location. In the case above, E is for the Royal Small Arms Factory at Enfield. And finally, the II, as Jim states, is for the 2nd model S&W .455 hand ejector.
Somewhere on the gun there should be a "sold out of service" stamp which is two broad arrows positioned tip to tip. If it is missing, then the gun likely made its way here by a different route than through normal surplus import.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-27-2021, 12:37 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
If we're talking about the second gun in post #330, it also has the "crown/30" Canadian acceptance mark on the butt.
Since transfer to Canadian service usually happened after acceptance at Enfield and British service, the gun may not have opposing broad arrows; the Canadians didn't usually stamp them when they were surplused.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-27-2021, 01:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 4
Liked 28 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
If we're talking about the second gun in post #330, it also has the "crown/30" Canadian acceptance mark on the butt.
Since transfer to Canadian service usually happened after acceptance at Enfield and British service, the gun may not have opposing broad arrows; the Canadians didn't usually stamp them when they were surplused.
|
Thats the exact kind of info I was interested in - thanks so much! I have a lot of family in Canada so that's a neat connection for sure.
|
05-27-2021, 05:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Moved to Oklahoma
Posts: 96
Likes: 125
Liked 111 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
455 Hand Ejector 2nd Model Serial # 33764 on butt Roll marked left side of barrel SMITH & WESSON .455. Cylinder shaved for .45 ACP w/ moon clips and barrel cut to 4" Only marks are crossed pendants and broad arrow in Canadian C. Side note: This revolver was given to my mother in late 1953 from a family friend named George Kilgore who carried it through the Korean Conflict as a personal sidearm.
__________________
Klaatu Barada Nikto
|
05-28-2021, 03:57 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucher33
455 Hand Ejector 2nd Model Serial # 33764 on butt Roll marked left side of barrel SMITH & WESSON .455. Cylinder shaved for .45 ACP w/ moon clips and barrel cut to 4" Only marks are crossed pendants and broad arrow in Canadian C. Side note: This revolver was given to my mother in late 1953 from a family friend named George Kilgore who carried it through the Korean Conflict as a personal sidearm.
|
As much as I personally like a 4”, 45 ACP, N frame, please be aware that the 45 ACP cartridge is comparable to a proof load in these non heat treated cylinders.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-28-2021, 01:40 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucher33
455 Hand Ejector 2nd Model Serial # 33764 on butt Roll marked left side of barrel SMITH & WESSON .455. Cylinder shaved for .45 ACP w/ moon clips and barrel cut to 4" Only marks are crossed pendants and broad arrow in Canadian C. Side note: This revolver was given to my mother in late 1953 from a family friend named George Kilgore who carried it through the Korean Conflict as a personal sidearm.
|
I would stick to 45 Auto Rim because they are loaded to 455 pressures (~15,000) and not the ACP pressures of 19-21,000 required to operate the slide of the 1911, it's intended handgun. The S&W Model 1917 that ACP was used in has a heat treated cyl. The 455 does not.
Or if AR doesn't fire reliable (the 455 chamber shoulder is too far down the chamber to headspace on), you can reload ACP brass to 45 AR pressures so you can use the moon clips.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-10-2021, 10:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 4
Liked 24 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Historical letter for TL sn 5755 - one of 67 .455 TL with SN that w
This was the Triple lock sn 5755 noted earlier to be in the duplicate number range. According to Hondo44 (page 6 post #259) “It is one of the rare 67 .455 Triple Lock #s that was used twice.”
Hondo44 lists 2 ways to tell which revolver category this one is in. On inspection, It is not drilled through the sn and has no military markings, so is likely a category 2.
Just received the Jinks Letter on this one, which talks about the 2 revolvers receiving this sn and agrees it is likely the one in the commercial .455 range.
Pics of the revolver are at post #279 and #280.
Did a search all the numbers 5756 to 5776 on this forum and did not find any of the other revolvers in this shipment documented here. As the letter does not have an address for Colonel E. M. Edwards, not sure if this was a shipment to Canada (where this revolver was recently purchased), the UK or somewhere in the USA. Any info welcome.
Colonel E. M. Edwards does not show up in the “Library and Archives Canada - Personnel Records of the First World War”.
Thanks
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-11-2021, 07:01 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Congratulations!!
Thanks for showing the letter. It's a great letter and actually authenticates both revolvers with duplicated #5755. I waited a long time for one of a pair of the rare duplicates to finally show up and to also be lettered! Now I wait for the Category 1 gun #5755 to show up some day.
By the way, back in your post #280 you pictured the middle lock latch and asked why it's not blued? I don't think you got an answer. It's color case hardened like the hammer and trigger from the factory. And a great indication that it has original finish and has not been refinished!
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 08-02-2021 at 11:34 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-02-2021, 11:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
53433 - is a 3rd version BSR; ".455 MkII - 2nd Model". Crown over poorly stamped O on the butt. The # is likely too low to be one of the 14,500 Canadian shipped guns, but only a letter would confirm for sure.
|
I went ahead and got that letter, take a gander. Thanks to the post office, it already has that authentic crumpled look that many old letters have.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-02-2021, 11:55 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Thank you for sharing the letter! We never know for sure until verified by a letter; well worth it!
Ahh, thank you USPS! You can iron it on a flat surface with the iron set to the lowest heat setting!
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-13-2021, 02:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 205
Likes: 229
Liked 199 Times in 89 Posts
|
|
Hondo44
One more for your list .455, 12646, lettered as, shipped to Bigelow & Co December 6th 1916. British military marked and British commercial proofs.
You have 12996 listed the same as above but this serial number was a typo and the actual serial number we now know is 12496. (12996 may well have been one of the 300 guns in the shipment, but we do not know this for sure.)
Regards
Alan
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-13-2021, 09:46 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Thank you Alan,
Correct, I shouldn't have updated my database with that temporary listing. In this thread, page 5, post #223 has been updated today, 9/13/21.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
09-20-2021, 12:36 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 205
Likes: 229
Liked 199 Times in 89 Posts
|
|
Hand Ejector First Model caliber .455 12584 was shipped December 1916.Has British ordnance markings. Presumably one of the X300 to Bigelow & Co, London.
Regards
Alan
Last edited by AlanDavid; 09-23-2021 at 04:14 AM.
Reason: Forgot s/n
|
10-05-2021, 11:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 205
Likes: 229
Liked 199 Times in 89 Posts
|
|
For anyone that's interested I recently counted up the sales S&W 1st Model .455 HE revolvers made by the Army & Navy Co-operative Stores Society, in 1914 to 1915. I photographed the ledger pages which are held by Glasgow University in Scotland, some years ago.
It came to a much higher figure that I thought; 625 revolvers.
First sales were in December 1914 with most of the sales being in 1915 with the last sales being in August 1915. Only 8 2nd model .455's were sold sporadically in 1916 including at least one second hand one. Obviously after August 1915 The Army & Navy Co-op Stores could not longer get any more .455's to sell in quantity.
As I say I was surprised that the figure of 625 is so high.
regards
AlanD
.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-05-2021, 11:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 3
Liked 9 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
My 2nd model HE, ser. #49,346. Roll marked on left side of barrel for .455. It is stamped Crown/BP and Crown/BV on the barrel, Crown/BV on the frame and the cylinder, but does not have the Mark II stamp at the left rear of the hammer. The grips are not correct. I'd like to find a proper set for it.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 02:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 205
Likes: 229
Liked 199 Times in 89 Posts
|
|
Does it have a small crown mark with a number under it on the base of the grip?
|
10-06-2021, 04:48 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanDavid
For anyone that's interested I recently counted up the sales, [of] S&W 1st Model .455 HE revolvers, made by the Army & Navy Co-operative Stores Society, in 1914 to 1915. I photographed the ledger pages which are held by Glasgow University in Scotland, some years ago.
It came to a much higher figure that I thought; 625 revolvers.
regards AlanD.
|
Were these commercial sales to the general public?
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
10-06-2021, 04:52 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,934
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speeder3
My 2nd model HE, ser. #49,346. Roll marked on left side of barrel for .455. It is stamped Crown/BP and Crown/BV on the barrel, Crown/BV on the frame and the cylinder, but does not have the Mark II stamp at the left rear of the hammer. The grips are not correct. I'd like to find a proper set for it.
|
Thank you for the information for the database.
From the lack of the MK II stamp and associated stamps in the same location, that is likely a commercially sold example not sold to or used by the military.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|