Ruger LC9S or Glock 43?

Ruger LC9s for me - I had a Glock 43 but sold it. Personally, I like the magazine safety and thumb safety combo. Sometimes, it is good to be able to disable the Ruger depending on time and circumstances – removing the magazine is a quick and easy way to do that. But, most importantly – my Ruger was $330 versus $495 for the Glock. Just be sure to get MecGar magazines for it…
 
There are some differences

Will soon be looking for a slim 9 as my next CCW piece. I like the looks and feel of the Ruger LC9S. I did a side-by-side comparison with a Remington R51 and a Glock 42 (which I know is similar in size to the Glock 43). I would give a little bit of an edge to the Glock 43 for feel, but the Ruger did not have the extended mag, which may have made a difference. l am ruling out the R51 just because it is a new model and reliability hasn't yet been established. I do like that the R51 has an aluminum frame. I owned an M&P Shield briefly, but still liked the feel of the LC9S better. If there is a huge difference in price, the edge may go to Ruger. Reliablilty is a big factor. Which would you choose? Ruger LC9S or Glock 43?

As a side note, I am just now warming up to the idea of a polymer pistol. As I start to accept the idea of "Tupperware" in a firearm, I am starting to notice choices that I have never before considered.
I have both, the G-43 and the Ruger LC9s Pro. As for grip a grip sleeve as one poster showed is a simple solution for both pistols is more "grab" is preferred. Now, one plus for the G-43 is you can install a LaserMax Guide Rod laser on the G-43. ($$) They install in a few minutes.
Both pistols have been reliable with 500 rounds through both of mine. Accuracy? Both are fine for personal self defense as both are intended.
The one negative i have with the Ruger is the take down PIN. Pushing it out is no problem. Replacing it I've found the best way is to push the muzzle straight down on my table top while pushing the pin back in. Why? Holding the slide back just to the perfect
"spot" I've found troubling. So, I've the before mentioned procedure better.
For some reason and this has no research, I feel the Glock's design __very similar to all blocks___gives me more assurance several thousand rounds down.
I have the G-26 also and prefer this newer G43 hands down better for me. Even the erratic ejection of the G-26 is bothersome.
My two EDC packers___Either of my 9mm Shieds or my___for trips on the road or into Tucson, my Sig P320 compact.
My G-43 with guide rod laser is close to my recliner. Don't really
use it as a EDC. I would if I didn't have a Shield.
End opinion? Toss up!
P.S.
For the Glocks one round shortage> Pearce Grip PG-43+1
 
I've owned the LC9, LC9s and the LC9s Pro. For my own uses, I prefer the Glock 43 for a 9mm. I sold all the 9mm Rugers, but kept a LCP which I carry almost daily.
 
Have the old model LC9 and like it. Carries well, easy to hide. G43 is nice but unobtainable here in the Pacific Northwest. Was able to get one from an FFL friend in NJ but the hassle of shipping, etc. made it not worth getting another one since I already had the Ruger. Hope this helps.
 
I do have a Hogue grip sleeve ordered. I also ordered the Eclipse IWB conversion kit for my Blade Tech holster that came with the pistol.
 
Back
Top