I haven't ever shot a 45 LC and I was wondering how does it compare to shooting a 45 ACP? Which one is the hotter more powerful round? Are they basically in the same fruit basket?
I figured I could get the answer here quicker than checking Google for the answer.
As with ALL things ballistic, the answer is: It depends.
The original .45 Colt load was a 255 grain hollow-base lead slug over 40 grains of 3F black powder delivering around 900 fps from original 7.5" barrelled U.S. Army 1873 revolvers. This equated to approximately 460 lb-ft of kinetic energy which for 1873 was a VERY potent round...as it is today. Using modern, solid-head cases, about 32-35 grains is the most black powder one can cram into a case which still results in loads spectacularly more potent than most OTC .45 Colt ammo.
Shortly thereafter, the U.S. Army introduced the .45 Schofield revolver and cartridge. The more lightly constructed Schofield cartridge was a 230 grain RN lead slug at 750 fps, for around 287 lb-ft of kinetic energy...not even close to the orginal .45 Colt, but close enough "for government work!"
When the U.S. Army introduced the .45 Auto, it too used a 230 grain bullet in full metal jacket trim, loaded to around 840 fps, which, in the early 1900's was quite a potent round and is still to this day considered so by many.
The reason it's hard to push the .45 slug to higher speeds is because it's a massive slug, with huge bore and rapidly builds stress and strain on whatever gun it is shot from...not to mention recoil.
The "modern" .45 Auto can easily be loaded 10K psi above original spec, but few end-users find the recoil acceptable...this is basically the genesis of the modern .45 Super.
The .460 Rowland is basically nothing more exotic than a .45 Auto loaded to 40K psi which normally produces unacceptable recoil and strain on a semiautomatic handgun, yet by using a properly designed muzzle brake (recoil compensator), such a powerful load is practical.