Unisuued No4 MK2 Enfields.

I doubt that anyone cares much about an old guy's Ishapore in this trove of safe queens, but I like it and here it is anyway.
 

Attachments

  • wesson forum 339.jpg
    wesson forum 339.jpg
    72.9 KB · Views: 45
Last edited:
I like Ishapores and have one. It is one of my more accurate milsurps and it is a bonus that it fires 7.62 x 51 ammo.
 
I also have this interesting one...a 1957 dated "F", marked as FTR

JZu6RVT.jpg

trkhQic.jpg

SeH9K0h.jpg

4fRdkp8.jpg
 
Last edited:
I bought one very similar from a shop on Long Island in the mid 90s. They'd taken all of them out of the wrap and had them in a barrel in the middle of the store at $50 each.

I don't have that one anymore, but I do have 2 other No4 rifles.
 
Beautiful guns there. My #4 Mk1* appears to have "been there" during WWII and is a bit of a collector's item. It was made by Savage/Stevens here in the U.S. during WWII for the Brits. I also have an unopened box of .303 British ammo made by Winchester specifically for these rifles during the war. Very interesting and classic rifles.

John

ENFIELD_No.%204%20MK%20I%20STAR%20%20SAVAGE-STEVENS_zpssxgomoy3.jpg

(click for larger view)
 
The Enfield always played second fiddle to the Mauser, and for good reason.

The Mauser is a much stronger, much more accurate rifle. More reliable as the cases are rimless too.
 
My dad cut one down for a deer rifle in the 60's. Not sure what it was exactly but it came in the mail in the original wrapping.

He shot several deer with it and thought it was a pretty good rifle. Then again he was a ww2 vet who enlisted in 44 and did all of his time in the 3rd ID in Italy, France and Germany until the end of the war. He was partial to aperture sights.
 
The Enfield always played second fiddle to the Mauser, and for good reason.

The Mauser is a much stronger, much more accurate rifle. More reliable as the cases are rimless too.


ROFL!

I needed some good comedy.

Did you seriously revive a 4.5 year old thread just to post that "expert" assessment?
 
Last edited:
There were quite a few unissued #4's that were made at Fazakerley(sp?) Arsenal in the early to mid 1950's that showed up on the surplus market a few yrs ago.
Still in their 'Mummy Wrap' they were a great deal.

The earlier production was ser# prefixed 'PF' . Most all of those were for Export to Commonwealth and Colonial locations. Included in that were the Irish Contract.
Some searching will get you the specific ser# range of that contract and the others in the PF series.

Later on (1954?) the Ser# prefix was changed to 'UF A,,,,'.
Most all of those went right to storage in the UK and never left the Country AFAIK.
A collector told me that on paper, those UF ser#'d rifles were logged as built for the RAF, went right to storage and were then
surplused later on.

Busy work perhaps for the ROF/Fazakerley at the time maybe?. Keep the factory running and all that.

Should have bought one of those back then but was too interested in the No1 rifles and earlier. Still am.

For someone who knows and understands the British habit / obsession with adding marks every time the guns were reworked or shipped to other countries, these marks read like a book of the gun’s history.
 
The Enfield always played second fiddle to the Mauser, and for good reason.

The Mauser is a much stronger, much more accurate rifle. More reliable as the cases are rimless too.
Granted, I'm biased toward the Lee Enfields, but "always played second fiddle"? For the ranges involved in action, the Lee Enfield was actually a better rifle. You had a faster bolt action, 10 rnds. to the Mauser's 5, and better sights. In WWI, the "old contemptibles" laid down such heavy fire that the Germans thought they were up against machine gun battalions. The Lee Enfield sniper rifles were very highly regarded with most pundits stating that if they had a critique, it was the weight. I live not too far from the old Long Branch arsenal lands in Toronto and as a young guy, I cut my teeth on the Lee Enfields and nailed my first deer with one. Again, I admit my bias, but my favourite of them all was the 1950 Long Branch rifles that came on the market many years ago. If the story is true, they were discovered in a NATO warehouse in Belgium all crated in the grease. They were all stocked in black walnut and the metal was a lovely blued finish not the ugly suncorite or even the parkerized finish of the wartime production. I've sold all my collectibles, but that's still my personal most loved of them all.
 

Attachments

  • 41653634_1-1632684329.jpg
    41653634_1-1632684329.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 15
Back in the late 1970s I was looking for a nice SMLE to shoot, but couldn't find one. But I was able to buy an ANIB Enfield No. 4 Mk I from a local gun shop, complete with spike bayonet and scabbard for $150. The Long Branch rifle's wood stock was perfect, and it still had cosmoline grease in the barrel and action. I never did shoot that rifle, I guess because it was so nice, and ended up trading it years later. I wish I had kept it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top