|
|
 |
03-19-2025, 01:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 1,092
Liked 7,490 Times in 2,073 Posts
|
|
Suppressors Lack 2A Protection?
It will be interesting to see how this one plays out. Seems like a elephant size contradiction, DOJ claiming suppressors lack 2A protection, but they are treated as worst of the worst NFA items. If the DOJ is correct, should they be delisted from NFA and treated as the tin cans that they are? But if they are treated that way, can they be banned at will because they are not protected by the 2A? Interesting dilemma.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opini...fe175677&ei=17
|
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-19-2025, 02:25 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Peoples Republic of Calif
Posts: 5,175
Likes: 1,591
Liked 7,035 Times in 2,505 Posts
|
|
Interesting conundrum.
|
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-19-2025, 02:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 1,092
Liked 7,490 Times in 2,073 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertrwalsh
Interesting conundrum.
|
I'm thinking this falls under the category Catch 22
|
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-10-2025, 01:23 AM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sadly, Seattle WA
Posts: 11,203
Likes: 25,376
Liked 11,519 Times in 4,721 Posts
|
|
Suppressors are a hearing protection device. Nothing more. But too many folks have watched too many TV shows, so there is a level of public opinion that follows no logic.
Lots of those folks feel like the US should be more like Europe. Countries over there require suppressors at shooting ranges. Go figure.
__________________
Even older, even crankier....
|
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.
Linear Mode
