|
|
07-25-2011, 12:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,115
Likes: 1,691
Liked 16,325 Times in 4,241 Posts
|
|
9mm Defense Round
Purchase a 50 round box of Winchester 147gr JHP "Personal Defense" ammo at the ammo counter. This is the only defense round available.
Anyone use this ammo? Opinions?
Thanks,
Jimmy
|
07-25-2011, 12:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 1,902
Liked 5,630 Times in 1,544 Posts
|
|
By and large, 147 grain 9mm ammo is not terrible, but will be outperformed by 124 grain jacketed hollow points. I ONLY use 147 grain ammo in supressed guns, as the load I have in that weight is subsonic.
|
07-25-2011, 12:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Had the same question about a week or so ago, I put about 40 through my Sigma SW9VE to see how they fed and shot. First impressions are, they do pack a good bit more kick that the 115gr JHP but they are very controlable. This was a test at an indoor range with a distance of 30'. First shot was really low, next 14 were low and right, after a small adjustment, the rest were pretty much center mass and slightly low right. They seemed come in slightly lower than center, could be the heavier weight and some could have been me. Overall, what ever you aim and fire at, will go down.
John
|
07-25-2011, 01:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 982
Likes: 1
Liked 44 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
From all I read, the 124 JHP is the way to go.
__________________
Dom
|
07-25-2011, 01:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 107
Liked 456 Times in 205 Posts
|
|
In my opinion you lose too much velocity with the 147gr loads. I stuck with 124gr.
|
07-25-2011, 01:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
|
|
If the load shoots POA/POI, feeds well in your gun and you can shoot it well, I'd say you have a winner.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
|
07-25-2011, 01:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pittsburgh Pa.
Posts: 124
Likes: 11
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
115gr P+ is a popular self defense rnd. Although some still believe heaver bullet weights are better. I think modern bullet design has moved beyond that belief. But truth be told ANY modern hollow point is deadly.
__________________
The absence of pain is...death
|
07-25-2011, 01:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 267
Likes: 45
Liked 66 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
I prefer 124 grain FMJ NATO rounds.
__________________
I believe in the wadcutter.
|
07-25-2011, 02:33 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 467
Likes: 139
Liked 147 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
I believe that's a very old design. I'd get on the internet and buy some of the more modern designs like Federal HST/Tactical, Winchester Ranger-T, Speer Gold-Dot, etc. They're going to perform better over a wider range of variables.
|
07-26-2011, 05:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,629
Likes: 3,726
Liked 7,235 Times in 3,015 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pigirondan
I prefer 124 grain FMJ NATO rounds.
|
So do I, or a commercial equivalent like my older lot of Geco.
|
07-26-2011, 06:04 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Near Chi-town
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 215
Liked 194 Times in 100 Posts
|
|
I'm partial to Federal Hydra-Shok and winchester Ranger ammo in 115 grain.
|
07-26-2011, 12:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 267
Likes: 45
Liked 66 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwslate
So do I, or a commercial equivalent like my older lot of Geco.
|
I try to buy as much as I can, when I can. Those rounds coupled with the Mozambique drill, get it done.
__________________
I believe in the wadcutter.
|
07-26-2011, 12:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: McCall, ID
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babalooie
I'm partial to Federal Hydra-Shok and winchester Ranger ammo in 115 grain.
|
That's what I purchased with my 9mm, Federals.
|
07-26-2011, 01:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wood Co., Texas
Posts: 394
Likes: 244
Liked 212 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Trade it for a .45......
|
07-26-2011, 11:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
|
|
9BPLE is $18 a box of 50 at Cheaper Than Dirt and that load has been proven time and time again on the street.
CorBon DPX is always a good choice if you're Daddy Warbucks.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
|
07-27-2011, 05:22 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,062
Likes: 1,112
Liked 1,865 Times in 440 Posts
|
|
When I chronographed this round, the Winchester White Box 147 gr JHP, it averaged 1,092 fps from my Glock 34.
Last edited by LOBO; 07-27-2011 at 05:29 PM.
|
07-27-2011, 09:12 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Wrong side of Washington
Posts: 10,193
Likes: 13,017
Liked 17,135 Times in 5,146 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyj
Purchase a 50 round box of Winchester 147gr JHP "Personal Defense" ammo at the ammo counter. This is the only defense round available.
Anyone use this ammo? Opinions?
Thanks,
Jimmy
|
I prefer a faster round also. But you'll be fine Jimmy. I'm carrying the same now because I'm out of Win Ranger 127 +P+.
|
07-27-2011, 09:13 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Wrong side of Washington
Posts: 10,193
Likes: 13,017
Liked 17,135 Times in 5,146 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ol' geeser
Trade it for a .45......
|
Another from the 45 peanut gallery!
|
07-28-2011, 05:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
Liked 133 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
The 147gr JHP's are adequate for defense use. The premium self defense bullets like the SXT's, PDX1's, XTP's, HST's, Gold Dots and Golden Sabers are likely a bit better and have more reliable expansion but its a marginal improvement.
As mentioned just about any of the current JHP's will do well.
|
07-28-2011, 05:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 1
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pigirondan
I prefer 124 grain FMJ NATO rounds.
|
Why in the world would you prefer a FMJ? Unless you are in the military, there is no good reason to use the 124gr NATO round for self defense. Sure it will put people down for a dirt nap, but many times it will produce a through and through wound that does little damage to the internal organs. It punches a nice little hole straight through. Even when the bullet tumbles inside of tissue, it does not create nearly as much damage as a longer round (like the 7.62 or 5.56). Wounds like this will allow a person to continue fighting for a period of time even if the wound is a fatal one. The 1986 Miami shootout is a great example of bullets failing to stop a person.
Modern hollow point bullets are designed to produce the largest wound cavity possible. They are designed to dump massive amounts of energy into the body. They are designed to stop a person quickly and effectively.
You could make the argument that shot placement is everything, but with a FMJ round, you would have to hit the brain, spinal cord, or heart to stop the fight quickly. Thats a pretty tough shot to make is a stressful situation.
I don't know if you are a hunter or not, but I'll ask anyway...
Would you hunt deer with a FMJ round? I can't think of anyone that does. People want to drop a deer in their tracks, and that is often achieved with hollow points, ballistic tips, and soft points that are designed to expand on impact.
Just because it can be done, doesn't mean its always a good idea.
Last edited by Ghostofwar; 07-28-2011 at 06:00 PM.
|
07-28-2011, 11:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
|
The primary determinant of stopping power is BULLET PLACEMENT. A cool, deliberate marksman with a little .32 Walther PPK will beat a panicky, inaccurate man with a .357 Magnum or $1200 customized .45 auto every time
American ammunition is the best in the world. Stick to Federal, Cor-Bon, Hornady, Remington, Winchester or CCI ammunition. Some foreign stuff is pretty good (PMC, IMI-Samson, Fiocci), some foreign stuff is great (Dynamit-Nobel, Norma, GECO), some foreign stuff is practice-only junk (e.g. Wolf, CDM - Mexico, military surplus), but no foreign stuff is anywhere near as good as domestic ammunition when it comes to vanquishing hostile attackers. Buy American
|
07-31-2011, 12:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 267
Likes: 45
Liked 66 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostofwar
Why in the world would you prefer a FMJ? Unless you are in the military, there is no good reason to use the 124gr NATO round for self defense. Sure it will put people down for a dirt nap, but many times it will produce a through and through wound that does little damage to the internal organs. It punches a nice little hole straight through. Even when the bullet tumbles inside of tissue, it does not create nearly as much damage as a longer round (like the 7.62 or 5.56). Wounds like this will allow a person to continue fighting for a period of time even if the wound is a fatal one. The 1986 Miami shootout is a great example of bullets failing to stop a person.
Modern hollow point bullets are designed to produce the largest wound cavity possible. They are designed to dump massive amounts of energy into the body. They are designed to stop a person quickly and effectively.
You could make the argument that shot placement is everything, but with a FMJ round, you would have to hit the brain, spinal cord, or heart to stop the fight quickly. Thats a pretty tough shot to make is a stressful situation.
I don't know if you are a hunter or not, but I'll ask anyway...
Would you hunt deer with a FMJ round? I can't think of anyone that does. People want to drop a deer in their tracks, and that is often achieved with hollow points, ballistic tips, and soft points that are designed to expand on impact.
Just because it can be done, doesn't mean its always a good idea.
|
That's like you're opinion man. I prefer it (NATO 124 grain FMJ)because I've seen more people killed with FMJ than hollowpoints. I practice the two-shot hammer and I shoot center mass.
However, that is just my opinion about the 9mm. My actual (meaning what I plan to use/practice with most) preference is using a .45 ACP revolver loaded with 225 grain wadcutters. That's right, wadcutters.
__________________
I believe in the wadcutter.
|
08-01-2011, 08:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 1
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pigirondan
That's like you're opinion man. I prefer it (NATO 124 grain FMJ)because I've seen more people killed with FMJ than hollowpoints. I practice the two-shot hammer and I shoot center mass.
However, that is just my opinion about the 9mm. My actual (meaning what I plan to use/practice with most) preference is using a .45 ACP revolver loaded with 225 grain wadcutters. That's right, wadcutters.
|
Ok. Go for it.
|
08-02-2011, 12:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I use any quality 115gr. or 124gr. JHP that functions and groups adequately in the particular pistol. My current HD pistol is loaded with the discontinued Remington 124gr. JHP. When this ammo is expended I will probably buy a bunch of federal 115gr. JHP (9BP), Winchester 115gr. JHP (White Box, SXZ or Silvertip) or Federal 124 gr. HST if I can find a good deal on it.
If I was LE then, I might want to consider choosing ammo that has had some kind of jacket-core bonding since the possibility of needing to shoot though auto glass or car doors. However since I am not, then all I really car about is reasonably reliable expansion with decent velocity.
|
08-02-2011, 01:00 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sebago Lake, Maine, USA
Posts: 5,434
Likes: 6,726
Liked 6,725 Times in 1,862 Posts
|
|
Speer 124 Grn JHP +P
Ammoman has it for $27.50 a box, delivered in case quantity.
This ammo's performance is nothing short of spectacular. I know .40 carriers that are going back to 9's simply because of this load.
I don't trust the 147 grn 9P loads. Recently a largish feral cur was shot while in the act of destroying live stock. The officer is a member here, a fantastic shot and like a son to me. He used a WW 147 and hit the pooch right in the breadbasket. It ran off and howled miserably until being chased down, found and finally got two in the hat.
|
08-02-2011, 03:57 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 193
Likes: 2
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
147gr Federal HST std. pressure for me. 12 to 14 inches penetration, reliable expansion to @ .65 caliber, sharp and nasty expanded bullet. Shoots soft, accurate and cycles perfectly in the Walther PPQ.
I would feel good with the 124gr HST as well but prefer the 147.
|
08-06-2011, 10:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MC EWEN, TN.
Posts: 99
Likes: 6
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Ranger SXT
For HD I use the Win Ranger SXT. In the distance it is used it is very accurate. And the 147 gr. Will do its job if you do your Job. Shot Placement is what counts.
Safe Shooting Always
|
08-07-2011, 01:57 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 620
Likes: 79
Liked 282 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyj
Purchase a 50 round box of Winchester 147gr JHP "Personal Defense" ammo at the ammo counter. This is the only defense round available.
Anyone use this ammo? Opinions?
Thanks,
Jimmy
|
The Winchester USA economy brand 147JHP is one of the worst U.S. manufactured rounds available for SD use. The bullet/load (originally designated as the Type-L Olin Super Match) was designed/developed in the early-mid 80s for use in suppressed subguns for the SEALs. it was never designed for use in pistols for LE use let alone for civilian SD purposes. The Win 147JHP bullet construction hasn't changed since it was first developed. Any of the more modern designed 147JHPs would be a better choice (Golden Saber, Hydra-Shok, Gold Dot, HST etc.).
|
08-07-2011, 07:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,629
Likes: 3,726
Liked 7,235 Times in 3,015 Posts
|
|
When I carry one of my several 9mm autos it is loaded with 124 gr fmj
ammo that I have chronographed and know is warm and consistant.
What's the difference between a HP bullet that fails to expand beyond
bullet diameter for whatever reason and a 124 gr fmj bullet? Bullet
placement and penetration are what counts. No high tech super bullet
is going to compensate for poor shot placement. I suspect that many
people who choose expensive HP ammo for carry will not want to
spend the money required to run a few hundred rounds through their
guns to test reliability.
|
08-07-2011, 08:22 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: FL Panhandle these days
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 941
Liked 526 Times in 270 Posts
|
|
i have the 147 in my x-d 9 sub compact. works great for me. cycles good and has decent accuracy for a factory load. i prefer to have golden saber in 125gr bonded for carry, but the 147 is good too.
|
08-07-2011, 09:00 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 467
Likes: 139
Liked 147 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwslate
When I carry one of my several 9mm autos it is loaded with 124 gr fmj
ammo that I have chronographed and know is warm and consistant.
What's the difference between a HP bullet that fails to expand beyond
bullet diameter for whatever reason and a 124 gr fmj bullet? Bullet
placement and penetration are what counts. No high tech super bullet
is going to compensate for poor shot placement. I suspect that many
people who choose expensive HP ammo for carry will not want to
spend the money required to run a few hundred rounds through their
guns to test reliability.
|
"Since there's a chance a bullet will fail to excel, and end up performing like the inferior design, I'm just picking the inferior design to ensure it." That's not a very good argument. But I see it all the time.
Of course high tech bullets don't compensate for poor shot placement, they try to compensate for bullets that fail even with good shot placement.
|
08-07-2011, 12:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 69
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I use Double Tap 115 grain JHP for self defense if I carry a 9mm, but that's not often. I usually carry a 10mm.
|
08-07-2011, 09:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 620
Likes: 79
Liked 282 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwslate
When I carry one of my several 9mm autos it is loaded with 124 gr fmj
ammo that I have chronographed and know is warm and consistant.
What's the difference between a HP bullet that fails to expand beyond bullet diameter for whatever reason and a 124 gr fmj bullet? Bullet placement and penetration are what counts. No high tech super bullet is going to compensate for poor shot placement. I suspect that many people who choose expensive HP ammo for carry will not want to spend the money required to run a few hundred rounds through their guns to test reliability.
|
Very simply, a JHP of modern design will always have a mechanical ability to expand past it's original diameter. A FMJ can deform if striking hard bone, but it will NEVER expand. Also, the JHP has a flat meplat at the beginning of the HP cavity. Even if the JHP fails to expand this allows slightly more ability to tear/crush tissue in it's path, as opposed to the round smooth and pointy meplat of the FMJ bullet that just slips through tissue forcing it aside and leaving very little tissue damage. And let's not forget about the FMJ's well known history of dangerous overpenetration which is borne out by viewing ballistic gel tests that show 9MM FMJ bullets penetrating 24+ inches.
With the vast wealth of information that is available to us today regarding the effectiveness of JHPs compared to FMJs, it is irresponsible and negligent to be using FMJ or solid bullets for personal SD in any service calibers.
|
08-07-2011, 11:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 255
Liked 307 Times in 140 Posts
|
|
Jimmy, it seems to me that the 147 grn hp wins two ways: 1) the higher SD means that it will likely pentrate better than a lighter bullet, and 2) its a hollow point, so if it does expand you benefit from the greater tissue damage along the path of the bullet.
Seems like the issue most shooters dance around is whether or not the hp bullet will actually expand. Some go light and fast to make expansion happen - with some risk that the lighter bullet may not penetrate sufficiently. Others give up on the expectation of expansion and look for maximum penetration - and go fmj. The 147 grn hp is just another solution to the problem. I use them - Winchester Ranger T-Series and have found them to be accurate and reliable. I can't prove they are better than any other solution advocated here. I believe the San Diego PD is using them and have found them effective in a number of shoots.
Truthfully, I have quite a few Speer 124+P Gold Dots and fmj rounds socked away. I'd feel pretty good about using any one of the three loads.
Out
West
|
08-08-2011, 08:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,629
Likes: 3,726
Liked 7,235 Times in 3,015 Posts
|
|
With the vast wealth of information that is available to us today regarding the effectiveness of JHPs compared to FMJs, it is irresponsible and negligent to be using FMJ or solid bullets for personal SD in any service calibers.
Hmmm...... I thought it was irresponsible and negligent to perpetrate
criminal acts on law abiding citizens. Oh well. Solid bullets would
include lead RN,WC and SWCs I suppose? FMJ bullets often tumble in
soft tissue and create wounds larger than diameter. CTG COLLECTOR
I would think by now the issue of dangerous overpenetration would
have been laid to rest given the reality that the police miss their perps
with so many of their rounds fired. I think the dangerous deeply
penetrating FMJ 9mm bullet is what I want on my side. But hey, to
each his own. Carry what you have confidence in. Most of us will never
have to live or die testing our ammo choice.
|
08-08-2011, 08:25 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Republic of New Jersey
Posts: 82
Likes: 93
Liked 37 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
What if you are not allowed to use JHP (or any hollow points for that matter) as in the republic of New Jersey???
|
08-08-2011, 09:17 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 348
Likes: 37
Liked 93 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOUBLESHOT
What if you are not allowed to use JHP (or any hollow points for that matter) as in the republic of New Jersey???
|
In that case, I'd probably use Federal EFMJ.
|
08-08-2011, 11:46 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 3,223
Likes: 4,041
Liked 3,710 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
|
If you feel okay with a 38 Special +P 158 grain load at 950 fps you should be just fine with a 9mm 147 grain slug moving at 1000 fps. If anything, the 9mm should have a little edge over the 38.
|
08-08-2011, 12:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 232
Liked 688 Times in 252 Posts
|
|
Look at this thread for more info specifically on 147 grain ammo:
9mm 147 gr. ammo. Good or bad?
|
08-12-2011, 08:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I use 9mm 115 jhp in my carry gun for a couple of reasons. It is cheap, plentiful and shoots well in my small frame auto. I stay away from FMJ because I worry about collateral damage. I don't know what kind of energy is left after a FMJ bullet exits on a through and through wound but I don't want to risk hitting an innnocent down range.
Lets not kid ourselves into thinking, that because we may have real tight groupings at the range, that in a deadly force situation you will have the same results. Accuracy under that kind of situation is the exception not the rule. I feel more comfortable with a bullet that is going to expend most of it's energy on it's first contact, whether that is where I am aiming, a building wall, car, hotdog cart or anything else. If you have to shoot through something to hit your attacker, then you are probably going to have a hard time justifying the use of deadly force anyway.
I think what grain bullet you use in SD is less important than making sure you practice with what you carry and practice, practice, practice. That is what will save you.
Just my two cents for what it's worth
|
08-12-2011, 08:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Jimmy, Sorry that last post was a little off the topic of your question. Should have written -
No, I have never used that ammo but I did read somewhere that the lighter bullets actually hit harder than the heavier ones. Not sure I agree with the physics of that. But any bullets is better than no bullets.
|
|
Tags
|
357 magnum, commercial, glock, hornady, hydra-shok, military, ppk, remington, sigma, smith-wessonforum.com, subsonic, sw9ve, tactical, walther, winchester |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|