|
 |

01-10-2017, 03:24 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: South Of The North Pole
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 491
Liked 710 Times in 424 Posts
|
|
Hydra-Shok VS JHP
I have both of these in 9mm. My Hydra-Shok are Federal 124 gr and my JHP are Hornady XTP 124 gr. The Hydra-Shok are in my G17 and the Hornady are in my 5906.
Do you prefer one over the other, or, would use both of them for home defense? Below is a ballistics gel video comparing the (2), that I find very interesting.
Hydra-Shock vs Hollow Point in HD 720p 60FPS - YouTube
|

01-10-2017, 11:35 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 1,883
Liked 8,232 Times in 2,112 Posts
|
|
Agreed, both are older designs.
Speer Gold Dot, Winchester Ranger SXT, and Hornady Critical Duty all seem to consistently do well in tests.
|

01-11-2017, 07:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 665
Likes: 171
Liked 665 Times in 281 Posts
|
|
Buy some federal hst and don't look back
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

01-25-2017, 02:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 51
Likes: 139
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
I know it's kinda generic, but whatever shoots best. Are there better defensive rounds out there? Yes. If you're buying new, stick with Speer Gold Dots, Federal HST, or Hornady Critical Duty (or Critial Defense in a pinch). Are the Hydra-Shoks and XTP still lethal? If you do your part, yes. Find out whichever shoots best out of your guns, that you can afford and easily find, and keep them loaded with that. Check out SGAmmo.com for some good deals on defensive rounds. Good luck!!
|

01-25-2017, 02:58 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 465
Liked 1,579 Times in 701 Posts
|
|
Since I shoot a .45, I carry 165 gr. Hydra Shoks. I feel quite comfortable that they will punch a large enough hole to get the job done.
|

01-25-2017, 03:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,325
Likes: 20,437
Liked 13,273 Times in 4,232 Posts
|
|
The most important issues are reliability and your ability to hit what you are aiming at.
Your ammo should always work in YOUR gun, not my gun or anyone else's gun. That means running at least 100
Rounds through YOUR gun with no issues.
Your ability to reliably hit what you are aiming at quickly is of paramount importance.
If you can do that and your ammo works every time in YOUR
Gun, there is no practical difference between the various ammo.
A
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

01-26-2017, 11:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 375
Likes: 1
Liked 531 Times in 173 Posts
|
|
RPG is right. It doesn't make a tinkers d--m what's in your gun if it doesn't hit what you are aiming at. 1 hit with a 22 dead center is much better than an arm hit with a 357 at 1500 fps. I've seen a fair number of people shot. The quickest kill I saw in 25 years with the exception of a 12ga was with a 22 rifle. Girl friend shot him with a 22 rifle at 28ft. Had just "tuned her up". Had a cigarette in one hand, matches in the other and a smile on his face. DOF. ( dead on floor) Never knew what hit him. Accuracy beats big.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

01-28-2017, 08:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
Liked 137 Times in 95 Posts
|
|
IMO either of the bullets you have chosen should work fine as a self defense load. Of the two I would feel better about using the Hydra-Shok. The Hydra-Shok is an older bullet design that has the advantage of having a good reputation as a man stopper both statistically and anecdotally which is why it is still sold for civilian self defense and police service ammunition.
Hornady XTP's are a later design than the Hydra-Shok. Because they haven't captured a large following from law enforcement there isn't any readily available statistical comparison of their effectiveness nor much anecdotal information as to how effective they are in real shootings. They are a quality bullet though and show good results in tests run by amateurs on YouTube that indicates they should do well in actual shootings.
There are several other "newer" ammunition choices available now but IMO it's unlikely they provide any significant advantage that would make it imperative to swap your ammunition out. You may want to go to one of these later when you need replacement ammo.
|

01-28-2017, 11:42 PM
|
 |
Moderator SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,845
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,096 Times in 2,672 Posts
|
|
IMO and only my opinion, there is way too much stock put into "the best bullet" and the FBI protocol. As citizens we are not the FBI and if you hit what you shoot at most any bullet will do it's job.
Go with ammo that is 100% reliable in your gun, is accurate in your gun and is available. All the rest will take care of itself.
Besides, hopefully you will never find out how well the bullet will stop the bad guy. Statistics say you won't.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|